saveasteading Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Don't worry, I know you should never do this as it compromises the strength. No, I'll explain. I'm considering lintels as sole plates. I've specified it before and it was a success. BUT I didn't watch the fixing of the timber stud to it. The joiners didn't complain so it must have been OK. One fixing centrally so won't touch the steel. I'm assuming use of sds, and top quality bits (de Walt?) Has anyone done this? 1. How easily does the bit sail into the top of the very hard concrete lintel? 2.What's a good and easy fixing for a 47mm batten into it? I once saw a joiner using hit-fixings for sole plate to blockwork, that involved a metal cone as the expanding part, and was impressed with it. But I lost the details and can't find it in searches. I'll explain the purpose and benefits if we go ahead this way. It should be the industry norm I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell griffiths Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago These soleplate fixings are only really to locate it while building, you should have some form of hold down strap at locations specific to what you are building. why the lintels, does it span over a pipe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saveasteading Posted 16 hours ago Author Share Posted 16 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Russell griffiths said: why the lintels I'll explain later. They are sole plate snot structural. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe90 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago I have drilled into and fixed with rawlplugs into concrete lintels many times, just try to avoid the steel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceverge Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago It sounds like a thermal bridge which will redirect any condensation driven decay to the bottom of the studs. What is the issue with timber sole plates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamyTea Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 8 hours ago, saveasteading said: that involved a metal cone as the expanding part https://www.screwfix.com/p/fischer-fxa-throughbolts-m10-x-126mm-20-pack/48986 Used to use them on the large log cabin saunas. The smaller ones we used the plastic ones. https://www.screwfix.com/p/easyfix-nylon-hammer-fixings-8mm-x-120mm-10-pack/19157 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saveasteading Posted 7 hours ago Author Share Posted 7 hours ago Either of them would do but 1 is over the top and expensive for lots. 2 is ok but i rather liked the ones i was describing. For this process, i would be buying about 180m of lintel and fixing them down at 1m cc and then timber to them at 1m cc. Hence 20p fixings is the plan. And 8mm dia will ease the drilling. Threaded rod and squeezy epoxy is an unnecessary fiddle. I thought the ones I saw were Timco, but I can't find them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe90 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Frankly it’s only to stop sideways motion or uplift so need (IMO) to go overboard, screws and rawlplugs will suffice IMO. how are fixings the lintels in place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamyTea Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 25 minutes ago, saveasteading said: Either of them would do but 1 is over the top and expensive for lots. 2 is ok but i rather liked the ones i was describing. I did not look at actual bolt diameter, just picked the first search hits. You could use a combination of small bolts, DPC and PU adhesive. That way you would get a very strong bond, damp proofing and airtightness. Am I right in thinking you mentioned this idea a year or two back? Edited 7 hours ago by SteamyTea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saveasteading Posted 6 hours ago Author Share Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, SteamyTea said: mentioned this idea a year or two back? I mention most things several times, I'm told. Again: When building a 3 storey timber building i was surprised that the timber contractor insisted on a brick kerb above floor level.. That cost was a loss to us. I could see why they wanted it but thought bricks would displace. So used lintels. The price halves with big quantities and it doesn't need a bricklayer. It worked and the company said it was a great idea. Now we are building a timber building inside a steel building. I had intended to use tanalised timber as sole plate, but pc lintel is going to : Live for ever Be much more accurate Not distort or compress. Rest on continuous mortar, not occasional plastic packers. (Strength, precision, no gaps for air or beasties.) Not get kicked over. Hold the stud robustly during construction. Against? Cost 4 x timber May still need a timber sole plate above it...or can we fix stud panels direct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamyTea Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, saveasteading said: When building a 3 storey timber building i was surprised that the timber contractor insisted on a brick kerb above floor level.. That cost was a loss to us. I could see why they wanted it but thought bricks would displace. So used lintels. The price halves with big quantities and it doesn't need a bricklayer. It worked and the company said it was a great idea. That's roughly what I remembered. As it is going to be inside an existing building, it should be easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now