Jump to content

Critique my UFH plan


LiamJones

Recommended Posts

UFH will be installed in 100mm self compacting concrete slab tied to a142 mesh (hence 200mm pipe spacing to line up with mesh). 200mm PIR below.

 

ASHP, flow temp 31.1c, DT 3-5c, heat demand for whole house 2600W. 'm hoping to not have heating upstairs, so have aimed for 26W/m2 over the 100m2 ground floor.

 

ufh.01.PDF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The design of the pipe layout is OK.

 

Will it be zoned?

I presume with that flow temperature you are going to install a HP. If so, and you are going to be zoned likelihood is you will need a buffer tank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BotusBuild said:

The design of the pipe layout is OK.

 

Will it be zoned?

I presume with that flow temperature you are going to install a HP. If so, and you are going to be zoned likelihood is you will need a buffer tank

Hey, thanks for feedback. Yes, it's ASHP, no zones, fully open. Has about 50L volume, ASHP likely to be 5kW and i've read rule of thumb is 10-15L/kW, so should just about be okay, i think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nod said:

Warm up will do you a FREE design via one one there approved installers 

 

Not tried warmup, tried a couple others and they've been 💩, I trust this forum more than the wider world.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your bathroom, reduce spacing to 150mm, you never have enough heat.

I would be inclined to the kitchen area on 225 to 250mm centres.

 

Dump the hall loop, use the loops transiting through the hall and borrow that heat. I do similar, my kitchen loop does the shower room first, then zig zags by the front door, then does the kitchen diner. Works well, do hottest area first.

 

Operate as a single zone, electric towel rail in bathroom, that adds a second heating zone and keeps building regs happy as well.

 

Unlikely your dT will work, you will be nearer 4 to 7 in reality.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JohnMo said:

Your bathroom, reduce spacing to 150mm, you never have enough heat.

 

I would be inclined to the kitchen area on 225 to 250mm centres.

 

Dump the hall loop, use the loops transiting through the hall and borrow that heat. I do similar, my kitchen loop does the shower room first, then zig zags by the front door, then does the kitchen diner. Works well, do hottest area first.

 

Operate as a single zone, electric towel rail in bathroom, that adds a second heating zone and keeps building regs happy as well.

 

Unlikely your dT will work, you will be nearer 4 to 7 in reality.

 

 

Thanks you, am i getting to caught up on the 200mm spacing lining up with the a142 mesh size? any diversion from that and i'll have pipes running through the spaces in the mesh. I'm worried about the concrete pour and them standing on unsupported pipe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LiamJones said:

 

Not tried warmup, tried a couple others and they've been 💩, I trust this forum more than the wider world.

I’ve used warm up on the last two

Absolutely fine and FREE 

The all use the same software 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LiamJones said:

Thanks you, am i getting to caught up on the 200mm spacing lining up with the a142 mesh size? any diversion from that and i'll have pipes running through the spaces in the mesh. I'm worried about the concrete pour and them standing on unsupported pipe?

Could you consider fibre re inforced concrete and ditch the a142 mesh ?  be much cheaper.

So much easier to staple the UFH pipes direct to the insulation plus you are not driven by the mesh size, and the pipes are fully supported 

Edited by Chanmenie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Chanmenie said:

Could you consider fibre re inforced concrete and ditch the a142 mesh ?  be much cheaper.

So much easier to staple the UFH pipes direct to the insulation plus you are not driven by the mesh size, and the pipes are fully supported 

 

for bits i could ditch it, but the a142 is also providing structural properties over old foundations to help with differential movement.

 

I also like that on mesh (on chairs), it can sit half way up the slab. should be more efficient? by how much i dont know.

 

I think ill probably stick with the mesh, but thanks for the alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LiamJones said:

 

for bits i could ditch it, but the a142 is also providing structural properties over old foundations to help with differential movement.

 

I also like that on mesh (on chairs), it can sit half way up the slab. should be more efficient? by how much i dont know.

 

I think ill probably stick with the mesh, but thanks for the alternative.

Ah I did wonder if there were structural reasons. 
not convinced the rebar chairs do make it any more efficient as you still heat the whole slab 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...