Jump to content

Recessed cause a ‘ cone ‘ of light ?


Pocster

Recommended Posts

My other half is a little photophobic: she can't stand glare.

 

The light from surface-mounted LEDs  almost always cause her slight physical pain. So all our LEDS are recessed about 30mm. There is no more a 'cone' of light with those as with surface mounts: but there is absolutely no glare. In terms of lumen output, I'm not sure if there's a difference between recessed or surface mounted lights. We worked on 5000 lumen in the kitchen and office, a good deal less elsewhere. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ToughButterCup said:

My other half is a little photophobic: she can't stand glare.

 

The light from surface-mounted LEDs  almost always cause her slight physical pain. So all our LEDS are recessed about 30mm. There is no more a 'cone' of light with those as with surface mounts: but there is absolutely no glare. In terms of lumen output, I'm not sure if there's a difference between recessed or surface mounted lights. We worked on 5000 lumen in the kitchen and office, a good deal less elsewhere. 

Yeah we have the ‘normal ‘ recessed in the bedroom ; 1st photo . Without dimming it’s so blinding it actually hurts my eyes . Can’t see what I’m doing in bed .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ToughButterCup said:

My other half is a little photophobic: she can't stand glare.

 

Many GU10 LED bulbs and fittings come in a range of beam angles. The narrow beam bulbs (eg 28 degrees) create a "spot" effect, more shadows but less glare. The wider angle beams (90, 120+) create a more uniform light but more glare. 

 

With the old halogen bulbs the filament emits 360 degrees and the beam angle is controlled by the reflector and fitting.

 

If she really hates glare I probably wouldn't fit spots at all. Fit larger fittings with diffusers or uplighters that bounce light off the ceiling so you cant see the bulb directly.

Edited by Temp
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ToughButterCup said:

My other half is a little photophobic: she can't stand glare.

Has she got cataracts?

Was the first thing I noticed.

After they put in new, shiny bright, acrylic lenses, you only need 0.25W/m² to read by.

That is about 32 lux.

 

Have I ever mentioned how painful a white background on a screen can be.

So simple to just put the gentlest if grey tint on it.

Do it once on a website, it is done forever, for everyone.

Edited by SteamyTea
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, she always been photophobic from early childhood.

 

Never complains about it - only reason I noticed was when, even on fairly dull days, she consistently put the glare-shield down while driving - almost always while driving south ( roughly  towards the sun ). 

 

Thanks everyone for the concern and suggestions.

The most difference for her was made by thinking about where she needs  'task' light (narrow beam, cold temperature)  and where  'fill' (warmer, wider) lighting would be better.  In each case recessed light source cuts glare for her by 100 %.

 

Happy wife, happy life.

Edited by ToughButterCup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pocster said:

That’s a long trip 

 

Mmmmm, but when on the same trip,  the road leads (say) North, away from any potential glare, she still leaves it down. 

I point out that doing that makes obeying traffic lights a bit more difficult. 

 

And leave it at that. Knuckles just a little whiter than usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...