Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Would decent tile adhesive give a better bond?

 

When the bond fails with tiles, it tends to be on either the tile or the substrate, which is why they are often best primed / back buttered.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've used PU adhesives to stick hard to glue materials like plastic trim on cars. I've also struggled to get mortar to stick some non-porus stone. Never thought to use PU on the latter.

 

I'm thinking that the PU adhesive will probably stick very well if the brick and tile is dry, but perhaps not so good if they are damp? On the other hand mortar can usually cope with a bit of damp because its water based.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, steveoelliott said:

Hi,

 

Having now opted to go with porcelain copings for my parapet walls... I have the option of either using standard mortar with SBR bridge or a PU adhesive.

https://www.castlecomposites.co.uk/product/adhesive/

 

I'm guessing in theory this should be more watertight than cement, hold better and be less prone to cracking.

 

Any thoughts???

 

Flexible tile adhesive will allow you to bed them and will stick like sit to a shovel 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, steveoelliott said:

I am going to have a DPC under the copings as a secondary defense should water get through the joints.

 

I thought this may be the case.  A bit of a pain under thin tiles.  Not much sticks to DPC very well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...