DC5 Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 Hi folks our last query on our building warrants is they are unhappy with the fire protection on the steel frame. The designer has gone back and suggested 2x12.5mm gyproc encapsulation and they have said this isn’t allowable according to the white book. They are now talking painted intumescent layer! ive not used a steel frame before just wondered if this is fairly normal and easy to have painted ie is this something the supplier would normally do? Any comments appreciated. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Punter Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 If you can do the plasterboarding it is much easier. The intumescent paint is very expensive, messy and needs loads of coats to achieve the design thickness. Use Fireline plasterboard. It is much better value than Glasroc. Depending on the steel section, you may need 2 layers. There is a reference table in the White Book C03 Steel Encasements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nod Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 40 minutes ago, DC5 said: Hi folks our last query on our building warrants is they are unhappy with the fire protection on the steel frame. The designer has gone back and suggested 2x12.5mm gyproc encapsulation and they have said this isn’t allowable according to the white book. They are now talking painted intumescent layer! ive not used a steel frame before just wondered if this is fairly normal and easy to have painted ie is this something the supplier would normally do? Any comments appreciated. thanks I would check the design While the paint is quick and easy It’s incredibly expensive Most of the fireproofing that I do calls for a 25 mil void between the steel and PB Some are ok with multi board shoe fired directly to steel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_r_sole Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 whilst I would usually be of the same opinion about the expense of the intumescent paint, the last job I had this issue, the paint was actually cheaper than the pb solution (but that was due to the shape and intricacies of the install rather than material costs) The question is why your architects solution doesn't comply with the regs? Definitely get the relevant page out of the whitebook and prove your solution complies (but that should be the job of your architect) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now