Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Due to doors etc. there  is only one place for the position of stairs to our extended loft conversion.  All was going well with the design of the stairs until I realised the purlin, will create a head cracking problem, as it means the 2.0 m headroom cannot be met on the stairs.  
 

8C89C8F0-46D8-42CA-A3DD-59146FEF148C.thumb.jpeg.8e9dea26179cfe764731b12ead19f258.jpegCF4D218E-12F4-4F24-9265-EE9768AC3D11.thumb.jpeg.7a3fdc9e91715d69e01554568e22c889.jpeg
The green line on the diagram shows the 2.0m line.  The stairs are at a max. of 42 degs.
 

Any easy / simple ideas to get around the purlin?
 

Other half thought of replacing part of purlin with steel or cable, not sure how it would work or if practical.  

 

Otherwise thinking of something like this

ADEFB722-B2AD-4CC0-848F-4D7C4CDCA6CD.jpeg.435f23aaea83ef8cbe7b7d0c71ebb060.jpeg

 

.But as we are removing normal stairs from elsewhere, not sure how building inspectors would view it.

 

Any ideas welcome.

 

Cheers Jenny.

 

Posted

Can you pitch the stairs at 52 degrees or get rid of one of the winders at the bottom?  I appreciate it will throw the top landing forward 240mm.

Posted
  On 18/06/2020 at 12:21, Mr Punter said:

Can you pitch the stairs at 52 degrees or get rid of one of the winders at the bottom?  I appreciate it will throw the top landing forward 240mm.

Expand  


Max. pitch per Part K building regs.  is 42 degrees unfortunately,  unless use ladder or alternative tread stairs for loft conversions. 

Posted
  On 18/06/2020 at 12:59, Jml said:


Max. pitch per Part K building regs.  is 42 degrees unfortunately,  unless use ladder or alternative tread stairs for loft conversions. 

Expand  

 

Doh! I meant 32 degrees - the same as the roof

Posted (edited)

38 degrees would match the roof.

 

But I would say the same, shallower stairs or could you fit a supporting wall either side of the stairs under the purlin and then chop the purlin out, probably cost more in structural engineers calcs than its worth

Edited by JFDIY
Posted (edited)
  On 18/06/2020 at 12:21, Mr Punter said:

get rid of one of the winders at the bottom?  I appreciate it will throw the top landing forward 240mm.

Expand  


 

 

  On 18/06/2020 at 13:17, JFDIY said:

 

But I would say the same, shallower stairs or could you fit a supporting wall either side of the stairs under the purlin and then chop the purlin out, probably cost more in structural engineers calcs than its worth

Expand  


Have tried to work on shallower stairs, but top landing position is fixed due to doors etc. 
 

Wall probably not suitable  but could you have a supporting beam or steel?  

Edited by Jml
Posted

by the time you have properly insulated the ceiling to current regs it's going to sitting somewhere in line with the purlin anyway?

Do a quick uvalue calc to see how much insulation you're going to need, and then revise the stair layout

Posted

On your line drawing (black background) what's that at floor level below the purlins? Are they going to be steel beams? If so it might be possible to support the purlin either side of the stairs on that beam and remove a section of purlin. However it's not quite that simple. The rafters without a purlin may need doubling up for example.

 

You could also consider a dormer or velux in that area which would also require a section of purlin to be removed and possibly a rafter or two.

 

You will need to discuss with an SE if you want to go down any route that cuts or removes the purlin.

 

And as @the_r_sole says the purlin might not be the limiting issue.

Posted
  On 18/06/2020 at 14:28, the_r_sole said:

by the time you have properly insulated the ceiling to current regs it's going to sitting somewhere in line with the purlin anyway?

Do a quick uvalue calc to see how much insulation you're going to need, and then revise the stair layout

Expand  


 

 

  On 18/06/2020 at 15:44, Temp said:

On your line drawing (black background) what's that at floor level below the purlins? Are they going to be steel beams? If so it might be possible to support the purlin either side of the stairs on that beam and remove a section of purlin. However it's not quite that simple. The rafters without a purlin may need doubling up for example.

 

You could also consider a dormer or velux in that area which would also require a section of purlin to be removed and possibly a rafter or two.

 

You will need to discuss with an SE if you want to go down any route that cuts or removes the purlin.

 

And as @the_r_sole says the purlin might not be the limiting issue.

Expand  

 

Many thanks.  Will look at it from an insulation thickness viewpoint, I think we will have to resort to stepped stairs.

Posted

I still cannot see without the upper floor.  Can you take out a tread from the winders at the bottom and add a step at the top?

 

Also, veering off, you seem to be demolishing a lot of what was there and building a very large footprint of over 200m2. Could you demolish and rebuild to gain exactly what you want, saving 20% VAT in the process?

Posted
  On 20/06/2020 at 14:02, Mr Punter said:

I still cannot see without the upper floor.  Can you take out a tread from the winders at the bottom and add a step at the top?

 

Also, veering off, you seem to be demolishing a lot of what was there and building a very large footprint of over 200m2. Could you demolish and rebuild to gain exactly what you want, saving 20% VAT in the process?

Expand  


Unfortunately don’t think it’s practical to add a step at the top, diagram attached.

 

The budget would not run to demolition even with the VAT saving.  We. are making as few alterations as possible and “reusing” lintels with a new floor area of approx. 60 m2 and a bit of demolition.

 

5EEFB2CA-5401-48BF-BFC4-D343357B7779.thumb.jpeg.a15d4ff768e22323af854dab1a138979.jpeg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Not sure if it helps, but the headroom can be reduced to 1.9m for a new loft stair.

 

Assuming a small dormer window to just achieve the required headroom is not possible, could you look to install a rooflight as that will provide you some additional height within the recess of the rooflight itself?

 

If you’re going down the route of upgrading the rafters to meet u-values, etc... you’d normally bolt the new rafters to the side of the existing and therefore probably eliminating the need for the purlin. But even without it, the increased rather sizes and insulation requirements may end up brining you back to square one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...