Alan Ambrose

I'm finding that even the ones that claim to be UV-resistant have fairly woolly specs. UV Resistance ? 'Long Term' it says for POWERLON® UV Façade. Yeah, what does that mean? Maybe someone who has gaps between their cladding has done the research?

There’s also Metal Gutta stainless e.g. https://www.roofingsuppliesuk.co.uk/products/stainless-steel-125mm-gutter-2-4m-length Anyone used that?

Anyone use these and have any recommendations? Our build is slowish and our LPA is properly difficult. Therefore I’m anticipating we’ll have the external roof and wall membranes on show for some time and therefore liable to UV. I can see stuff like Tyvek UV facade, but it still has only a 4-month UV life?

For budgeting and decision making purposes, does anyone have a rough idea of the cost of these? Any other competitors you considered? How did you provide for inevitable maintenance? Dropping them down from their slot or somehow extracting them from the front? Did you bury the side channels in the window surround or leave them proud?

Can I ask - does the recirc pump somehow not interfere with the mains pressure supply from the UVC?

Interesting take in NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/business/britain-wind-farms.html?unlocked_article_code=1.EVA.WLzl.GhDlPJD9mxzg At the bottom: Some analysts, though, say that the British system locks in high prices. “It is hard to escape the conclusion that when all the costs are factored in, the deals struck today will push bills up at a time they are already high,” wrote Sam Dumitriu, head of policy at Britain Remade, a research organization. I also learned that the thing being auctioned is the guaranteed min price. Not sure how long for or for what quantity of power.

BTW if you've bought electric Veluxes over the last few years, there's a free app control kit going: Get a Free VELUX App Control and Extended Guarantee

>>> old wooden lentils With gruel? People were a lot poorer in those days. Yeah it does look like it propagated from the window aperture and then died out doesn't it. You have steel lintels now? The fix looks a bit of a bodge. You could get someone up there on a ladder, clean it up and re-grout properly. Then see if it re-appears over the next few years.

>>> taking back control of its energy, and lowering bills for good Yeah, right. Until the big US tech firms double the load on the grid. Err, what is being auctioned here - the right to build off the coast?

Yeah, there won’t be much variation in price and they’ll probably be shipped direct from Velux (or to local merchants and then they’ll deliver locally). In our case a local merchant was equal price and delivery was free.

I'm having trouble facing up to the thought of vast quantities of access holes for blowing in insulation punched into the underside of my wonderfully (well maybe) airtight roof. Can anyone put my mind at rest?

I wonder whether they've relaxed that rule now? I've have had / have now direct comms between myself and the other side's solicitor. While there's a risk that you balls stuff up procedure-wise or law-wise, there are also advantages. Similarly, I always attempt and usually succeed in obtaining direct comms between myself and a property buyer or seller. Allows much more scope - e.g. you can put your heads together and figure which part of the client <-> solicitor <-> solicitor <-> client chain is holding up proceedings.

Following this up - anyone used the Velux 'smart' stuff - VIG 300 (for app control), VIX 300 (for smarter app control)? Does it work reliably?

>>> you can keep Koi in there. What a fantastic idea - maybe a fish tank in a niche in the wall? Or is that all a bit dentist’s surgery?

OK this is fairly easy, although please take care to give the key relevant info when asking a question, otherwise you're asking us to write very long mostly irrelevant if-then-else replies. The most obvious questions are what is your drainage situation / what soil-type do you have / where will this drain to?. So: Pay 'Freeflush' £100 for the SUDS calc. You need to supply the plan area of your roofs and non-permeable hard standing and your location. Hint: make your hard-standing permeable and draining (using say, MOT3) to vastly reduce that requirement. That gives you your tank volume. Figure out whether you (a) want to use crates, tank, pond, swale, lake or Versailles-like water feature and (b) where it eventually drains to - ditch, culvert, soakaway, drainage field. You will need a soakaway test for the last two. Draw a simple drawing showing the arrangement. Check the levels and drainage fall if you're not sure. Add a short narrative written in the language of a 5-year old for people who don't understand numbers or drawings. Example calc below and no, you can't use those numbers.

Buy a 2nd hand Armorgard box. (Yeah, I don’t know why the Americans can’t spell either.) Put your most valuable tools in that or in the house somewhere. All the rest of the xrap - nobody’s going to steal it, in fact you would have to pay someone to take it away - stick it under a tarp and then that’s an incentive to get your new shiny workshop up and running in less than a year.

Depends on the circumstances of course. Being given a bit of your parents land with pp. Go for it if you fancy. What could go wrong? Buying a brownfield plot for a bunch of cash with questionable access, drainage, utilities, newts, bats, rights of way, historic covenants, disputed boundaries etc? Don’t get any old conveyancer, get a land agent, commercial property specialist or someone (there are not many of them) with experience of buying that kind of land. This’ll cost more than minimum conveyancing fees too because of the amount of work required.

@Nickfromwales Re: clear CT1 I saw recently that the clear version is not intended for external use. Not sure why not - UV maybe or maybe a different formulation? See:

Just supposing you leave 5mm nominal gap around windows (this is a timber frame building). I get that you can install Compriband on the sides and top, but what about the bottom? Won't it just crush and leave a bigger gap at the top? 5mm temporary or permanent packers maybe?

I thought I would start this thread as I've recently started to grips with Non-Material and Minor-Material amendments. This is what I think I've learnt: + NMAs (section 96A) are called just that on the Planning Portal, MMAs (section 73) are dealt with by Variation of Condition - probably the condition that adopted your drawings. + Your LPA decides what is an NMA, and therefore they can refuse them pretty much as they want - there is no appeal. Similar for MMAs, but they can be appealed. BTW there's a government doc here: Annex A: summary comparison table - but it's seriously out of date. These are the questions that I have: + It's not clear to me whether with a MMA you need to re-apply for CIL exemption? + Is there any point to NMAs? It seems to me that if you're confident it will be accepted, then you might just as well make the amendment and then apply retrospectively if the changes are challenged. + Similarly, if you think there's any risk to an NMA, then you might just as well save yourself some time and go for an MMA - at least you can appeal that straight away.

>>> Not with a listed building on site. Interestingly, there is a neighbour between us and the farmhouse and they installed roof mounted PV panels recently. As PD hasn't been removed here and you don't have to specifically apply for permission to use PD (err permitted, duh), I wonder when and how the A2 PD conditions come into effect. Presumably not after you have installed the panels. >>> Ground mount them? I don't believe we have the space to ground mount them and then they would likely be subject to shading from tall trees. I've just submitted a MMA for the PV - at least I can take that to appeal.

We had an NMA refused just before Xmas which was largely concerned with PV panels. This was the relevant text: "The proposed alteration to the roof materials of part of the dwelling and the cart lodge would result in a markedly more contemporary appearance of the approved dwelling which is within the setting of a listed building which would amount to a material change in the design and its potential impact on the heritage asset." The proposal was to cover the roof of the barn furthest from the road with PV panels and change the look of the resulting ~300mm border from pantiles to trapezoidal metal - so it would blend in better. Sure, adding PV panels (which were described on the original application but not shown on the drawings) will make the look 'more contemporary' - but WTF, this isn't the 1950s. The 'heritage asset' btw is a farmhouse a 100m or so away - there are a couple of thousand of those in Suffolk. In my next application I will point out that we will be able to install PV under PD anyway but I notice this in the PD regs: A2 Development is permitted by Class A subject to the following conditions— (a)solar PV or solar thermal equipment is, so far as practicable, sited so as to minimise its effect on the external appearance of the building; (b)solar PV or solar thermal equipment is, so far as practicable, sited so as to minimise its effect on the amenity of the area; So, some wiggle room for the LPA. Thoughts?

I've been looking at these Geberit FlowFit Pre-Insulated pipes to use as supply pipes to the bathrooms running in a 50mm service cavity. Probably 20mm ID to bathroom and split locally to taps / bath / showers? (Kind of assuming there's nobody else in there when someone is taking a bath/shower). I've highlighted the ones that have max insulation but just fit in my service cavity. No need to insulate cold? Anyone have any thoughts? https://www.pipestock.com/geberit-flowfit-pre-insulated-system-pipe-blue-coils

Probably the item that failed is the driver and agree the easiest method might be to ask Siteco. What's the Merrytek bit though? Some kind of presence sensor or Dali thing? It's possible, but less likely, that that has failed rather than the driver. A remote possibility is finding a constant current driver of roughly the same spec that will fit physically.

>>> We had no problems insuring it Us neither on a barn conversion, entirely timber.