marmic
Members-
Posts
126 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by marmic
-
flashing over windows and doors - timber cladding
marmic replied to marmic's topic in Building Materials
many thanks - was thinking that as a possibility if I couldnt find a more purposeful trim and already have a roll here....... I did same on a garden office (posh shed!) few years ago at last place but wrapped it down over and stapled to the front edge of the reveal board (which were gravel boards!) - not sure how well it will withstand UV / full exposure etc. -
hello all, anyone know please if a preformed flashing like this/similar is available off the shelf from anywhere? so far not found.......... (25mm vertical battens + 21-25mm horizontal cladding/reval boards). ideally anthracite grey to match windows and roof. or if not best/easiest/recommded thing to use? be interested of course to know what others have used please................... many thanks
-
https://www.thehealthyhome.uk/
- 15 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- passivhaus
- technical
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
for planning stage design we followed passivhaus rules of thumb and submitted old school pencil drawings and statement (by me - cost was a huge amount of time!) and stated passivhaus, but didn't state certified. Once planning approved we then developed design further and paid consultant to run through phpp and we were bang on. We are hitting passivhaus high performance but not quite certified level however (wouldn't have paid for a plaque anyway!) which I had anticipated - simple reason form factor as we are only single storey app 100m2 - as JohnMo states form factor is important. yes the theory is use phpp at planning, but with some common sense and careful thought I didn't believe I needed to - which I didn't.
- 15 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- passivhaus
- technical
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
thank you - have just spoken with Tarkett - they have advised expansion gap is required...... shame, but as expected. back to glue down for me!
-
looking quickly (before I run out the door to catch a train at last minute to do what I'm meant to be doing!) can only see click and glue-down. Am I missing something? https://home.tarkett.co.uk/en_GB/collection-C002723-inspiration-classics
-
highly unlikley to be going anywhere imo - but that really doesn't help! Where does liability sit / calcs? Hopefully somebody on here can advise/suggest further. Assume no structural warranty? (they can be picky). Ours is very similar albeit with an addtional run straight down the middle under a structural spine wall in line with ridge. We used SE - design was almost the same as I had thought but very slightly deeper. Without SE calcs etc we wouldn't have got past our BCO / structural warranty provider
-
I don't know the answer but I would personally ask SE who designed the foundation - if they say yes (covered by their PI) and provide written confirmation BCO will I believe have to accept.
-
Sent them a polite and simple email (out of working hours) asking for a call** to discuss this particular product. So instead of calling they replied by email with no name (extract below in red - polite but astonishing - basically asking me to contact them again and do what I don't have time for) - to which I responded 'I shall look elewhere then.......' Nothing since - they don't care! Perhaps they think we're just browsing for fun and won't actually be spending money on floor finishes for a whole house? ** An approach I have taken quite often throughout the build process to save a lot of time and also narrow down companies that can be bothered. In some cases has also clearly been a good approach to provide some confidence they know what they are doing, or not! Particularly the larger packages / supply and install. Sometimes emails are of course more appropriate / preferable. I reckon on average when I've sent enquiries to a number of companies for the same thing: A third don't respond or want you run around after them A third respond but clearly haven't read the brief and/or don't know what they are doing often offering something we don't want/need With the final third being the narrowed down options - who we end up spending money with! Maybe it's just me, but I'm astonished so many businesses these days must lose out because they can't be ar#ed! I have to work for a living (construction industry) - if an email like this was sent out from the office of the company I am employed by I would not be happy! Rant over!! Thank you for listening!! 😆😃😁 Thank you for your message and your interest in our loose lay vinyl flooring. We don’t currently arrange outbound calls, but we’ll be very happy to help you by email with any questions you might have. Please let us know what you’d like to discuss, and we’ll provide all the details and guidance you need. Alternatively, you’re also welcome to give our customer service team a call directly if you prefer to speak with someone — you can find our contact number on our website. Kind regards, Your BRICOFLOR Team
-
sounds good, maybe too good - I shall dig deeper. Anybody had experience of this type of product please?
-
thank you. response from simply bamboo below - which is very much what I was expecting (but didn't answer about glue down section on website not showing anything. not sure how glued down product moves however - probably flexible adhesive, but imo can't then be bonded well). You’d need expansion gaps for any timber, no matter how its fitted. LVT may be best.
-
Architects have messed up. Next steps?
marmic replied to flanagaj's topic in General Self Build & DIY Discussion
Tpo map? -
Architects have messed up. Next steps?
marmic replied to flanagaj's topic in General Self Build & DIY Discussion
Fence doesn't always mean the boundary. You said originally hedge was neighbours. Assumption or has something changed? -
thank you Susie, have looked briefly online, few companies out there - may I ask who you've talked to please? found one with a glue down 'page' but no products listed!
-
😁 ah thank you, now i know another polite abbreviation! I thought maybe it was a brand or type!!! 😆 One floor company I called into did say this, but I wasn't convinced they knew what they were doing! others I have spoken with say you do - so who knows! also had contradictory info on suitability for bathroom etc
-
thank you - sounds interesting. what is the IIRC bit please? - nothing obvious appears on a google search.................
-
thanks John, tiles not right for us on this project as wanted to avoid grouted joints, & slippery for dogs, and cost too high for anything nice (which we had 2 houses ago - we cleared stock of a discontinued item and had a cracking deal!). Epoxy / micro cement - looks interesting, a very brief google search tells me market swamped with options! any pointers please? will have a proper look later...........
-
morning all, anything weird and wonderful I may have missed as an alternative to LVT but still affordable?! There are some cork based proucts out there for example but doubles the money! LVT seems at present to be the only option - and glue down to avoid expansion gaps at perimeters / doorways and keep watertight - currenty plan is keeping same everywhere. Limited to about 8-10mm thick. Don't want laminate flooring..... Any ideas beyond the obvious please would be very much appreciated I don't think there is anything, but may have missed something!?
-
Architects have messed up. Next steps?
marmic replied to flanagaj's topic in General Self Build & DIY Discussion
as i said previously: land registry plans don't always reflect accurately whats on the ground/history etc. Our previous house had a fenceline that was angled to the one side - but straight on land registry which would have given us a slightly larger garden - I asked solicitor and he said something along the lines of you've seen on the ground what you are buying, by disputing what the register indicates could open a can of worms, be expensive, and quite possibly not get you anywhere. boundaries can get messy - somebody I know bought a large plot, the vendor split the original title with a large hedgeline between fields being agreed as the boundary (I don't recall if there was a fence inside the hedge) - then proceeded to erect a fence on the side they had just sold (when the purchaser was away!). It went legal and the fence had to be taken down with all costs covered by vendor. They clearly wanted control of hedge as then applied for planning for multiple houses in the field they had retained, which was refused anyway. I've heard the term landcreep used......... correct or not I have no idea -
Architects have messed up. Next steps?
marmic replied to flanagaj's topic in General Self Build & DIY Discussion
good news it's not a ditch - is there not one on the other side? if there is potentially more good news! - curious as to where the raised bank to hedge is from - or does the ground level just step up where it's previously been levelled out perhaps? if the latter is the case you may need to think carefully about drainage here? regarding boundary and architect's responsibility they will probably throw this back over the net if they were working to details provided by you, or was establishing the boundary part of the brief? Agree talk to neighbour about boundary - but only once you are armed with the closest to facts/history/presumptions you can find. may also be worth looking for boundary markers - guessing extremely unlikely looking at photo but you never know. The land we bought was originally under one title with the vendors splitting it up. Wooden pegs were in the ground marking the split. We have replicated by digging a hole with post hole digger, ramming in deep a steel road pin and filled hole around pin with postmix. Now invisible but know where they are if we ever need. The stock fence we have erected is a fraction inside the legal boundary due to an error by fencing contractor. But in hindsight not a bad thing as to our advanatge should there ever be a future dispute with any new owners of adjacent land should our neightbours sell in the future - highly highly unlikely but it's covered for little effort and cost. -
Architects have messed up. Next steps?
marmic replied to flanagaj's topic in General Self Build & DIY Discussion
agree to be cautious before building. hopefully you have written evidence of where the boundary actually is? (and land registry plans don't always reflect accurately whats on the ground/history etc). if you don't have 100% evidence of boundary: Looks like a ditch in photo - or could be an optical illusion on photo where hedge banked up? In the event of a dispute the 'hedge and ditch presumption' could put the boundary on your side of ditch - if there is one? But hopfully you'll have something concrete to the contrary - talking of concrete, and if this is a ditch, hopefully your engineer has taken this into account + any water flow / roots. sorry to sound negative but all stuff to throw back at architect if not already covered - if applicable. Watercourses (even 'just ditches' are plotted on some maps) On a positive note however if there is a ditch on the other side (??) you might find the boundary is there. The way the hedge is banked up would indicate there is or was a ditch one side or the other. If blue on marked up image is a ditch the boundary could be the red - or the opposite if ditch is other side. -
merci - I may be wrong but i think EWI is commonplace in central europe too probably with not as many issues? new build and refurb? But the climate is drier, hotter, and colder than here in UK..........
-
ps - if all boxes ticked so far and it's dry ensure installation correct to ensure rain/moisture can't get in behind - particularly at eaves/verge/reveals. also consider detailing at dpc, especially at corners. I don't know but I'd personally dig deeper to establish if thermal bridging at ground floor - wall connection level becomes an issue???? google 'ewi problems' - AI overview interesting I really will now be quiet!!
-
I'm no expert in EWI and not planning to research as wouldn't use! But IMO: very careful consideration needs to be given to structures on an individual basis. There will I am sure be plenty of companies out there full of BS so probably advisable to ensure very careful due diligence There will I am sure be good ones too - and if eveything taken into account and building suitable it's probably ok? If buildings are built to 'breath' - which many with solid walls are - sealing things up on the outside may not be a great idea. Assume walls should be dry before applying to avoid trapping moisture in - which can then only go one way And if vapour internally needs to be prevented from getting into the structure and staying there causing rot and mould etc stopping it is easer said than done on an existing building Additional ventilation may be required? - passive or mechanical? Localised thermal bridging I'm guessing could also be an issue? (eg window reveals)? Only my opinions/thoughts..................... briefly back to the cavity conversation - I find most people seem to forget and/or don't know the original reason for them, and is also a mystery why many think bricks and stone etc are waterproof! They aren't - which is why wall ties have drips and cavity trays are necessary at abutments etc. Porosity will vary significantly. (obviously render/coatings a different conversation). Somebody I was talking to years ago was told by a so called 'expert cavity insulation installer' they would seal up the holes made in bricks to ensure water didn't get in! There are other issues IMO with pumping insulation into cavities but I'll leave it there as don't have all day! Full fill cavity insulation on new builds is I believe subject to location / exposure (regs) and needs to be very carefully specified and installed to avoid moisture tracking across. But I don't believe anything is stated with regard to the porosity of the outer leaf(?) - problem is who would define?! The difference between a relatively impervious brick or sealed render/coating etc and a handmade stock brick or limestone is huge. I shall now get back into my pram and say no more. 😀
