-
Posts
7139 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
jack last won the day on June 6
jack had the most liked content!
About jack
- Currently Using Personal Messenger
Personal Information
-
About Me
Considering a move to Octopus Energy and want to help BuildHub while getting a £50 credit for yourself? Please click here:
https://forum.buildhub.org.uk/topic/36891-considering-a-move-to-octopus-energy-and-want-to-split-a-%C2%A3100-bonus-with-buildhub -
Location
SE England
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
jack's Achievements

Advanced Member (5/5)
2.3k
Reputation
-
Most likely they're proposing this because that's how it's generally been done. Stuctural slab (no insulation underneath), insulation (and historically not much of it), then a screed on top. This works well in a poorly insulated house, because you probably can't afford to run the heating all the time given the energy losses. You therefore want to be able to heat the top surface of the floor quickly when the heating is on. This is the same paradigm as using radiators in poorly insulated houses - blast with heat for a couple of hours in the morning and the evening. You get fast heat-up of rooms, followed by fast cool-down as the heat escapes and is absorbed into the walls etc. With decent underslab insulation, the slab surface stays at similar temperature throughout the day, irrespective of whether the heating is on or off. In winter, our slab temp varies by a fraction of a degree over any 24 hour period. If I turned all the heating off in the middle of winter, we'd probably lose a degree a day. In short, with good insulation levels, using the structural slab as a heat buffer makes a lot of sense. I have polished concrete floors with this exact arrangement - UFH pipes in structural raft slab, and a ~65 mm screed over the original slab, with just a slip membrane (basically thick plastic sheet) between them. No issues at all. The extra concrete might even help with buffering.
- 10 replies
-
- ufh
- raft foundation
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
This won't work in a set-up that has separate terminals for cool and heat demand (which is how mine works). You could temporarily rewire the thermostat across the cool demand terminals summer and do what you say. I don't know that I'd risk having the thermostat wired across both demand terminals. While I'm sure there's probably some sort of priority involved, simultaneously calling for heat and cooling feels like a bad idea!
-
Yes, this. In addition to what @JohnMo says, I imagine your radiators won't do much for cooling, so should probably be turned off during summer (remember to turn them back on before the heating season!) You'll probably need a thermstat for cooling. Most thermostats for heating applications are configured to close (i.e., switch on) when the sensed temperature is below the set point. For cooling you'll want the opposite. I think (but am not 100% sure) that some thermostats can do both. If so, there'll be three electrical terminals: common, NO (normally open) and NC (normally closed). It's possible you can do something manual - i.e., no thermostatic control - by wiring a switch, or better yet a timer, across the cooling demand terminals. Either way, hopefully whatever wiring was used for your current thermostat has at least one spare core so you can use that rather than running another wire. I suggest you post answers to JohnMo's questions and go from there.
-
Engineering and service manuals are available here. See this page for setting cooling mode. Midea is correct that you want to be sure that your system is correctly set up for cooling.
-
Week 3 - Drains and other hidden things
jack commented on Benpointer's blog entry in Contemporary build in north Dorset
That's probably it. I think a lot of wild flowers very much dislike clay. -
Flat Roof with Parapet detail - correct fall
jack replied to Ay8452's topic in Roofing, Tiling & Slating
We actually have a reasonable fall on the side of the roof where we had the problems: But yes, better falls to and through the scuppers would certainly help. One thing that would still concern me is the amount of crap that would end up going down the downpipes and into the soakaway. I have some screens on the outlets to catch bigger stuff to reduce this, but over the years a lot of stuff still gets through. To an extent this is an issue for all roof types, but it feels like at least some of the leaves that fall onto a pitched roof get blown off eventually, or get shot over any anti-leaf measures in the gutters. -
Flat Roof with Parapet detail - correct fall
jack replied to Ay8452's topic in Roofing, Tiling & Slating
I've told the story before, but within weeks of moving in, we woke one morning to water coming through the ceiling in our bedroom. We found found another leak in the bathroom 6-8 metres away. The weld of the membrane on two of the scuppers through a parapet wall had failed (including the one on the left in the drawing above). We'd had words with the roofing contractor over the welds when they were originally done. I thought they looked terrible but he assured us they were fine. He ended up getting out the Resitrix rep to assure us that all was good. The rep wrote a "everything done to the contractor's usual high standard" email, despite a lot of the rest of it looking like a dog's breakfast. When they came back to fix the scuppers, we made them check and replace all the others. The welds on two of those had failed too, so 4 out of 7. He assured us (and I believe him) that they'd never had this issue before. I personally think they didn't clean the scuppers properly before installing them, and there was a film of dust or whatever from storage preventing decent adhesion. Touch wood the repairs have stood up for over 9 years so far. I'd never have a flat roof again, although the real weakness is the parapet wall. Keeping the outflows clear is a massive annoyance given how many big trees we have nearby, and the difficulty of getting onto the roof. -
Flat Roof with Parapet detail - correct fall
jack replied to Ay8452's topic in Roofing, Tiling & Slating
We had a lot of room to play with, and ours dealt with it like this: As built, we ended up with a parallel-sided channel rather than the complex things the architect drew. It's important to make sure that there are decent falls all the way to the exit of the outlet into the downpipe. In our case, some of the falls were a little marginal. As the underlying USB has sagged a little over time, there are now places in the gutters where water pools. -
I'm not sure whether they cover NI, but try Frontier Insurance.
-
No guarantees, but I had 3 or 4 (out of a couple of hundred) receipts that were in a tradesperson's name. I just made a note in the covering letter when submitting the VAT reclaim and they paid out. One was for exactly your scenario. In our case, our tiler could get insane discounts on certain stuff - way better prices than I could source the same things anywhere else, even after VAT reclaim. My thinking was that we'd either get the refund even though the invoice was in the wrong name (which is what happened), or the refund would be refused for that invoice, in which case we'd still be ahead compared to having paid for it ourselves at the higher rate. One other thing: a reason that some companies will refuse to give you the same discount as a business (such as a tradesperson) is that you are a consumer. A consumer sale comes with far more protections for the user (and hence potential hassle/risk/cost for the seller) than a B2B sale.
-
This has all changed over the last 2-3 years. Before that, there were a few years where HMRC regularly rejected VAT reclaim applications based on all sorts of odd definitions of "completion" (including some definitions that went against their own written instructions to applicants and internal employee guidance documents). Eventually, a few appeals went against them, and thankfully they appear to have become a lot more reasonable.
-
ASHP - our architect negative about them
jack replied to Wadrian's topic in Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHP)
Welcome. Is it his customers who have complained about noise and performance, or is he repeating the Daily Mail's opinion? Agreed GSHP is a lot more expensive. Even assuming you have the space for a GSHP, chances are it'll cost at least £10k more than an equivalent ASHP. They're also rarely specced in the UK so there isn't much knowledge about them in the industry. For that reason, from a performance perspective, I think installing a GSHP is as big a risk as installing an ASHP. Having too small a field (or bore), or burying loops at the wrong depth, or if you have ground that is sandy and often dry - any of these factors can lead to poor performance. We've had a 5 kW ASHP on our new build for nearly 10 years. It hardly makes any noise and has had no problem at all handling heating and hot water for our ~290 m2 house (admittedly PassivHaus-class insulation and airtightness, and we're in the South East, so not much energy required, but still). Until last winter, I'd been running ours with a base flow temp of 25°C, with a bit of weather compensation up to the high 20s in very cold weather. I now run the base temp a few degrees higher, and keep the heating period concentrated around the cheap period, so I use less energy in the expensive period.