Makeitstop Posted Thursday at 19:20 Posted Thursday at 19:20 (edited) Part of a job my daughter and son in law have underway is posing an either or type discussion..... This is..... The rear of the property is being extended and will be approx 70..ish sq metres once complete. The aspect is pretty much dead west facing, so plenty of sun. The glazed elements of this rear section are.... Slider of approx 4 metres by 2.4 metres Single pane t&t window of approx 1.8 metres high by a metre wide. Velux Rooflight of approx 2.5 metres long by 1 metre wide, split into two sections, one half fixed and other half electrically operated opener, fitted into small section of flatroof. Now, given the fact that this is west facing, which means a fair solar gain, would people choose 2g with solar glass, or 3g with standard glass? I ask, as the prices come in about the same for each. To me anyhow, this is how they stack up.... Benefits of 2g and solar glass 1) less solar gain. Thats about it from what I can come up with. Benefits of 3g std glass 1) Less noise during heavy rain 2) Better ability to trap in warm air that rises within the room during colder weather 3) Lower risk of condensation Given the fact that this rooflight has the ability to open during hot summer weather too, which allows warm air out, how much benefit does solar glass provide in reality? Both will have some affect on light transmission I know, but I've not looked into what the "actual" diff is. At the same cost, what would you pick and why? Am I missing anything obvious here? Edited Thursday at 19:21 by Makeitstop
Sparrowhawk Posted Thursday at 20:25 Posted Thursday at 20:25 My understanding of solar control glass is that up close you can see the coating on it. And that coating also reduces the light transmittance to around 70%, similar to triple glazing. So if the slider can take the weight then I'd go 3g
Jonny Posted Thursday at 20:39 Posted Thursday at 20:39 Also, with solar glazing, you are losing the benefit of “free” solar heating in the winter months. 1
Makeitstop Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago The question relates to the rooflight only guys.
Mr Punter Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Probably 3g as you may get better Ug value. External blind if solar gain needs eliminating.
Makeitstop Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago (edited) My view on any significant solar gain, is that it's going to be happening in the warmer months, when the external temp is elevated also. This is where the electrically operated opener comes into its own, as the warmer air is going to travel up into the ceiling void where the rooflight is positioned. If that is opened up, it allows that warmer air to escape. If it were a fixed rooflight, then the need for control of any gain is more crucial yes? Edited 9 hours ago by Makeitstop
Mr Blobby Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) All glass absorbs some solar gain so standard 3G is always going to have less solar gain than standard 2G. So 2g with solar glazing makes no sense to me as the solar gain% on 2G with solar glass is probably about the same as 3G but just colder in the winter. If you really want a roof light with low G then the velux passive has 5 panes (now mostly discontinued) of standard glass and so the G factor of just 35%. . For the slider, look at 3G with SKN 176 solar glass. This is what we have on our big kitchen slider and it is amazing. It looks exactly the same as standard glazing but is way cooler. Solar gain factor, as percentage of the heat that gets through is typically: Standard 2G = 65%, Standard 3G = 50% 3G + SKN176 = 35%. New velux with solar glass coating = 29%. 3G all the way, more panes the better, and SKN176/other solar coating where it is needed. Edited 5 hours ago by Mr Blobby
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now