Flat roof and solar

[LSB]

Our DIY new build has a flat roof (12 degrees).  This is huge at 24m * 9m and will be metal.  It's a barn conversion so we are limited to this design.

I'm being told that you can't have in-roof solar on flat roofs, is that really the case or have I just not found the right supplier.

Our planning does not allow us to go any higher than the top roof height, but also says we must have solar and we don't have space for ground mounted.

The roof is pointing south with nothing stopping the sun so is an idea location.

I don't want to cover the whole roof due to the size.

 

Thanks

 

[JohnMo]

1 hour ago, LSB said:

flat roof (12 degrees)

So not a flat roof (for insurance purposes).

 

You can have them on a 12 Deg roof, but winter performance will be utter rubbish. So I would tilt on stands to to a higher angle. Depending on width of roof the panel could go on the low side and still be below the ridge height and be tilted up.

[saveasteading]

12 degrees is far from flat. Not just for insurance but anything.

Most steel buildings I built were 6 degrees (10%). That required careful detailing and sealing.

12 degrees is fairly normal. steeper than that is very steep for metal.

 

So yes,  you have the wrong supplier. 

Do you really man 'in-roof'. It is easier, safer  and cheaper to have it mounted on the surface.

[LSB]

11 minutes ago, saveasteading said:

12 degrees is far from flat. Not just for insurance but anything.

Most steel buildings I built were 6 degrees (10%). That required careful detailing and sealing.

12 degrees is fairly normal. steeper than that is very steep for metal.

 

So yes,  you have the wrong supplier. 

Do you really man 'in-roof'. It is easier, safer  and cheaper to have it mounted on the surface.

I appreciate it's easier to mount, but I don't want to pay for a huge metal roof to promptly cover it up with panels.

We are very limited to our planning, the difference in height between low and high is 2 blocks high so 430mm.

Needless to say the planning and SE just specify solar without any details about mounting etc.

 

 

 

[JohnMo]

GSE trays can go on a 12 Deg roof I believe, they would displace the steel roof where installed. You may need to clean the panels regularly as the self clean function wouldn't work well at 12 degs.

[JohnMo]

Datasheet confirms 12 Deg is ok

gse-in-roof-datasheet.pdf

[saveasteading]

Whether mounted over or inset, you will see solar panels, not metal roof.

As you imply it is expensive I assume it is standing seam. I would never, ever put any opening into standing seam: it's sole purpose is appearance and its main problem is sealing at joints and interfaces. 

I avoid openings in any metal roof but SS is an issue.

 

Hang on... 12 degrees is about 20% isn't it, or one in 5. So a 9m span has a rise of 1.8m, not 430mm. Am I getting confused?

 

[-rick-]

31 minutes ago, saveasteading said:

As you imply it is expensive I assume it is standing seam.

 

It's never been the look for me (though I like the look). The whole appeal of standing seam for me is (assuming it's continuous on a single surface) nowhere that can leak. All the joins overlap and crimp in place. Therefore, once you add junctions and weird shapes the appeal fades.

[LSB]

53 minutes ago, saveasteading said:

Whether mounted over or inset, you will see solar panels, not metal roof.

As you imply it is expensive I assume it is standing seam. I would never, ever put any opening into standing seam: it's sole purpose is appearance and its main problem is sealing at joints and interfaces. 

I avoid openings in any metal roof but SS is an issue.

 

Hang on... 12 degrees is about 20% isn't it, or one in 5. So a 9m span has a rise of 1.8m, not 430mm. Am I getting confused?

 

It's probably me getting confused.   I took what I was told by roofing bod, but maybe I misunderstood.  Back to algebra to work it out properly.

[Mr Punter]

We put standing seam on a roof and the customer had solar added.  The were fixed by brackets that clamped onto the standing seams.  The roof actually had a slight fall to north but it still worked fine.  The standing seam was Kalzip type.

[saveasteading]

34 minutes ago, -rick- said:

All the joins overlap and crimp in place.

Except at the ridge. You know not to put anything through it, but lots of people don't, including Architects. I only have horror stories and dire warnings to go on , as I never did one. We had it in our portfolio of options, and no client ever chose it, based on cost and the warnings about function. We also offered it with sliding fixings to allow for movement as otherwise it can ping.

 

17 minutes ago, LSB said:

Back to algebra to work it out properly.

Yes do it yourself. Forget degrees and stick to the more useful horizontal length , height difference and slope distance.  you can do this yourself with a tape and a long stick.

 

430mm height difference over 9m ( 1 in 20 or so) would indeed be effectively  'flat' and not a great idea in metal cladding.

Come back when it's worked out.

[JohnMo]

5 minutes ago, saveasteading said:

1 in 20

Google says 2.86 degs, long way off 12 degs.