fatgus Posted yesterday at 14:19 Author Posted yesterday at 14:19 17 minutes ago, saveasteading said: admirable /scary. Or stupid I love the aesthetic and feel of earthen floors. Our site is predominantly clay and we'll be excavating a fair few tonnes. It will mostly be distributed around a field, but the possibility of actually using some in the house seems to good to miss There have certainly been a few raised eyebrows when it's been mentioned. Thankfully my wife is wonderfully understanding and will entertain these ideas. She also knows that unless we arrive at a robust solution it won't be going in the house. One of the downsides of a traditional earthen floor is the curing time, so we're essentially eliminating the linseed oil and replacing it with a much faster alternative. It's not rocket science, we design resin systems daily and have access to some useful test equipment (abrasion, tensile, impact, UV exposure). There's very little worth watching on telly, so it's a good way to spend an evening
fatgus Posted yesterday at 14:20 Author Posted yesterday at 14:20 11 minutes ago, JohnMo said: You may want ufh to help it set hard, have this picture of someone walking through wet sludge if it all goes wrong. Maybe ok for a mud hut, not sure I would bother for a house. At least you can dig your way out of it - literally That would make me popular I can see why that would make sense, but with the system we're using the heat would be problematic during the cure.
saveasteading Posted yesterday at 14:23 Posted yesterday at 14:23 As I didn't know that a traditional floor had linseed oil in it, you'll gather I know nothing. I had a house with clay paviors straight on earth, probably clay. There were worms.
fatgus Posted yesterday at 14:26 Author Posted yesterday at 14:26 3 hours ago, Square Feet said: I'm also planning to build a passive-level house and had the same questions re A2A. Last night I costed up the pipes, clips, manifold and connectors for UFH and if I've done it correctly it seems to be less than £1k all-in. So I will be putting it into mine I think as it seems worthwhile running the pipes at least. That doesn't help with your earth floor issue though. We did the same and you're absolutely right, it probably makes sense to put the pipes in regardless as a backup... we'll only get the one chance to do it. 1
fatgus Posted yesterday at 14:27 Author Posted yesterday at 14:27 3 minutes ago, saveasteading said: As I didn't know that a traditional floor had linseed oil in it, you'll gather I now nothing. I had a house with clay paviors straight on earth, probably clay. There were worms. I knew nothing about it until quite recently! Worms would be an interesting addition...
SteamyTea Posted yesterday at 14:39 Posted yesterday at 14:39 By putting in UFH pipework, you can always run it off a Willis heater for very low capital cost. That way you can bake the clay floor. (I put earth flooring in the same category as lime concretes, we have improved alternatives now)
fatgus Posted yesterday at 15:12 Author Posted yesterday at 15:12 31 minutes ago, SteamyTea said: you can always run it off a Willis heater for very low capital cost 👍👍👍
Indy Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago It's something I actively investigated and discussed with my builder, before chickening out. A few key points of difference though - ours is not a passive house, only built to BR standards. We had specified UFH on both GF and FF as the missus wanted it. I wanted active air con - and I actively looked into ditching the UFH on the FF and replacing it with a multi-split air con system that would cover all the rooms on the FF (not hallways and landing etc as that would be heated from the rising heat from the GF). It was definitely doable as the A2A units can do both heating and cooling though we were asked one key question by the builder which made us change our mind - would you buy a house with no source of heating on the FF? Most buyers wouldn't consider air con units to be source of heating so it does limit the resale potential quite a lot, and even though we aren't considering selling our place - it's something you have to consider as situations change very rapidly.
Gus Potter Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 9 hours ago, fatgus said: but where's the fun in that? I like your idea.. in principle.. is it a material consideration for you on how your idea may impact on the value of the house. If it's not then go ahead and have fun! It's your money after all. Edited 16 hours ago by Gus Potter
fatgus Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago 7 hours ago, Indy said: It's something I actively investigated and discussed with my builder, before chickening out. A few key points of difference though - ours is not a passive house, only built to BR standards. We had specified UFH on both GF and FF as the missus wanted it. I wanted active air con - and I actively looked into ditching the UFH on the FF and replacing it with a multi-split air con system that would cover all the rooms on the FF (not hallways and landing etc as that would be heated from the rising heat from the GF). It was definitely doable as the A2A units can do both heating and cooling though we were asked one key question by the builder which made us change our mind - would you buy a house with no source of heating on the FF? Most buyers wouldn't consider air con units to be source of heating so it does limit the resale potential quite a lot, and even though we aren't considering selling our place - it's something you have to consider as situations change very rapidly. That’s a very good point. Who knows what the future holds? 🤷🏻♂️
fatgus Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 6 hours ago, Gus Potter said: I like your idea.. in principle.. is it a material consideration for you on how your idea may impact on the value of the house. If it's not then go ahead and have fun! It's your money after all. It is a small consideration Gus (we’d be daft if it wasn’t), but we’re building for us and if I’m not confident in the floor, it won’t go in. The finish shouldn’t be too dissimilar to power floated concrete, but it will ‘feel’ nicer underfoot. Most people probably won’t notice.
JohnMo Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 6 minutes ago, fatgus said: Most people probably won’t notice. Most likely true, we have wood, tiles and carpet. Every day usage you don't even notice the transition between floor covering and am mostly in bare feet. Winter with UFH floor not not cold not even warm but not cold, summer with cooling nice and cool.
sgt_woulds Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 20 hours ago, fatgus said: It's not strictly an earthen floor. It's a kind of hybrid we're working on ourselves to allow us to use some of our excavated clay in the floor, which seems like a cool thing to do. First trial was great. Second was a shocker. We're now on six and it's getting there. What one might call a bit of a punt! Would certainly be easier and cheaper to go for the originally planned concrete, but where's the fun in that? 😁 More details, please! Maybe in a new thread. I personally would not put resin in any house I planned to breath in, but every day is a school day... I live on chalk rather than clay, but we do have wychert-built houses in the area which apear more durable than clay-based cob, so it is worth some experimentation. I'd like to try it in my workshop (with UFH) since earthen floors are less fatiguing to stand on for long periods. The cost of linseed oil is gives me pause though, as does the amount of time required to experiment and finish. I'm 12 years in on my build and really want to see an end date!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now