flanagaj Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago The image below shows the inspection chamber at the beginning of the run. As the first toilet comes in on the branch and the main leads off to the external SVP which is solely there for the sewage treatment plant, I’m concerned that I’m potentially going to get a blockage as there is no flow coming down the main run. if I remove the inspection chamber, I can then route the pipe into the main channel of the next chamber. This will enable the pipe to be rodded. I am then not sure how I’d then branch off for the external SVP?
Mike Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I'd move the IC & add a 45° bend so that the WC makes use of the main channel and connect the SVP run to the branch. But make sure your BCO is happy.
flanagaj Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Mike said: I'd move the IC & add a 45° bend so that the WC makes use of the main channel and connect the SVP run to the branch. But make sure your BCO is happy. Thanks Mike. That’s why this site is so helpful. I hadn’t considered doing it that way 👍
Nickfromwales Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, flanagaj said: I’m concerned that I’m potentially going to get a blockage as there is no flow coming down the main run. Based on what? That will work perfectly well, will not block, and is the normal way to do this. If you adjust as above then the BCO will demand that you provide a rodding access point to service the change in direction. Not a good idea at all, and it’s the side of the house so who cares about the extra IC? Stop micromanaging, and stop worrying, leave as is and get the house built!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now