Jump to content

Craziest green bling design


saveasteading

Recommended Posts

I have started a new thread rather than hijack one.

 

This was my proposal for the most misguided design, claiming (shouting out look at us) to be sustainable.

 

I have seen it perhaps 20 times without the rotors ever moving.

I read that if they all did rotate at optimum speed, then it could power 2 or 3 kettles in the flats below.

What would that have cost? Allowing for the fancy shapes, the loss of floor space, plus the kit itself, can I guess £30M at current costs? I am not going to analyse it but have considered the absence of snow load as a positive.

Of course it is crazy and somebody paid for it.

It probably got through planning by ticking the windmill box. At a similar time the London boroughs were insisting on alternative energy, so at least one new blocks was built with, and proudly boasted of,  pellet boilers. These required 2 lorry loads per day in Central London.  Never used of course and the 'backup' gas kicked in.

 

@SteamyTea suggests that a green roof would have been crazier. I have little time for them either, but don't think it us in the same league for cost or negative benefit.

A green roof would have added perhaps £2M, in direct cost plus strengthening the structure but add for annual maintenance.

But it might have had some marginal benefit if sensibly designed.

 

Any other suggestions of craziness  small or large?

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 31/05/2023 at 15:32, saveasteading said:

will be the next resource taken from Scotland to support England. A way of transporting wind energy to the big cities.

I believe they already have plans in place to sell hydrogen to the Netherlands.

 

I have heard of plans for wind turbines and within the same footprint hydrogen making facilities, and every so often a tanker comes in and takes the hydrogen away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnMo said:

have heard of plans for wind turbines and within the same footprint hydrogen making facilities, and every so often a tanker comes in and takes the hydrogen away

Then could fill the tower with gas, keep the pressure up and the towers can be made much lighter, saving steel.

 

I think think they need to sink a few nuclear subs.

Then run the generators and electrify the hull.

Get the polarity, and depth right, it will eventually float back up.

Then fill a huge balloon with hydrogen and wait till the wind is in right direction: free delivery to site 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteamyTea said:

Then could fill the tower with gas, keep the pressure up and the towers can be made much lighter, saving steel.

 

I think think they need to sink a few nuclear subs.

Then run the generators and electrify the hull.

Get the polarity, and depth right, it will eventually float back up.

Then fill a huge balloon with hydrogen and wait till the wind is in right direction: free delivery to site 

Think you may have had few to many coffee's or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...