Jump to content

Recommendations for single room heat recovery unit?


Recommended Posts

Hi, does  anybody have any recommendations for a single room heat recovery unit? 

My mum has a well insulated small house, there is a 125mm hole in the wall already at fairly low level so ideally would need to be reasonably low profile, and reasonably quiet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've thought about this approach as replacements for the bog-standard extractors in the bathrooms in our otherwise fairly efficient 2004 house so I'm watching with interest. I'm currently deterred by the limited choice to fit the existing holes in the walls and their high unit cost (we would need four). 

My contribution https://www.vent-axia.com/range/lo-carbon-tempraselv (not seen or tried). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No

Cost is simply how much something costs.

 

The cost benefit, is what it save you by installing product A compared to B.

 

A normal fan, on demand high flow rate when it's on, no flow when off.  dMEV more expensive than a normal fan, but can lead to better air quality as its on all the time, uses low energy motors low flow rate all the time.  Single room, MVHR, same flow rates as dMEV, but two fans to drive.  The saving come from heat recovery.  So if comparing dMEV with MVHR, the cost to install each will be £xxx or £xxxx, then you need to calculate the ventilation heat loss for the room and see if the payback time is worth the expense taking into account the heat recovery efficiency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Updating on outcome here. I ended up using an Europlast EER125 single room heat recovery which I got on eBay for £110. Fitted today. Easy fit, like an extractor fan. Works by reversing directions of air flow every 70 seconds. There's a ceramic heat exchanger inside which presumably collects the heat on the exhaust cycle and reuses it when it pulls the air back in. Two modes of operation fast and slow. Slow is not too noisy at all. You wouldn't want fast in a bedroom but fine in a bathroom/kitchen.   

 

Only issues I can see. You have to in theory wash the filters every three months so that means unclipping the grille and pulling out the heat exchanger. How many people will be bothered to do that in reality I don't know. 

Second issue, you definitely need a 127mm hole not a 125mm one, and you need the hole to be dead straight. I had a bit of a small bend on the hole when it crossed the cavity (was reusing an existing hole) and it caused the plastic tube to bend slightly which meant that the fan caught on the edge and made a noise. Needed to remove and expand the hole slightly. 

 

Will wait for real world performance in the winter but so far so good and certainly a step up from putting in an extractor fan. 

Hope this helps somebody considering a similar option.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only just seen this.

 

I'll add that I have been fitting the Lo Carbon Tempra P version (not the SELV one) for years in rentals (first in about 2013), paired with a PIV Loft Unit to give a throughput, and I have never had any complaints - except fitting a HRV in a bathroom. Because the air incoming is inevitably slightly cooler than the outgoing as efficiency is never 100% - so it is perceived as a cold draft by people just out of the shower.

 

So a PIV might be next step if you need a gentle throughput for the whole house.

 

Interestingly had a comment from a T today who pointed out that her unit has a Hi/Lo/Boost switch on the outside, which the early ones don't - and that her kids put it on boost, and that she notices the lower power used on her Smartmeter by turning it down. 


F

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

V helpful 

13 hours ago, Ferdinand said:

I've only just seen this.

 

I'll add that I have been fitting the Lo Carbon Tempra P version (not the SELV one) for years in rentals (first in about 2013), paired with a PIV Loft Unit to give a throughput, and I have never had any complaints - except fitting a HRV in a bathroom. Because the air incoming is inevitably slightly cooler than the outgoing as efficiency is never 100% - so it is perceived as a cold draft by people just out of the shower.

 

So a PIV might be next step if you need a gentle throughput for the whole house.

 

Interestingly had a comment from a T today who pointed out that her unit has a Hi/Lo/Boost switch on the outside, which the early ones don't - and that her kids put it on boost, and that she notices the lower power used on her Smartmeter by turning it down. 


F

 

 

V helpful. Does that model work the same way? I e. Alternate extract/supply cycles over a heat exchanger? Looks like there might be more gubbins in the wall unit on that one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, larry said:

V helpful 

V helpful. Does that model work the same way? I e. Alternate extract/supply cycles over a heat exchanger? Looks like there might be more gubbins in the wall unit on that one. 

 

It now has what it calls an intermittent mode (which is new to me), which sounds like that.

 

I bought them initially for the trickle mode, which only uses 3W on low trickle vs 15W on boost and 20W on 'intermittent', and their third-off the price "carbon reduction week" where there is an 80% efficiency heat exchanger and separated as far as possible inlets and outlets. There's also some burble about maintaining a slightly reduced air pressure relative to the rest of house for something something something reasons, which I think is probably half burble but also a minor effect.

 

https://www.vent-axia.com/range/lo-carbon-tempraselv

 

And having a PIV at the other end of the house helps resist eg towels on radiators or the "what? windows open?" tendency.

 

F

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lo Carbon Ventaxia ( which I have one of) has a counterflow heat exchanger ( straws in a pipe type) and two fans for balanced air flows. So not the same as the flow reversal type. IMO the flow reversal types have very inefficient heat exchangers despite their claims due to the way they work. They simply cannot recover much heat since they don't have a counterflow heat exchanger. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...