WWilts Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) How important is the BR 50mm gap all around the drain where it goes through a wall? Is anything less than 50mm seriously unsatisfactory for us to live in? BR approved doc H 2.24, diagram 7b Edited September 6, 2021 by WWilts diagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeGrahamT21 Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 If its in the Building Regs, then it must be adhered to as far as I can say. I wouldn't risk it for something so minor really. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWilts Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, MikeGrahamT21 said: I wouldn't risk it for something so minor really Trying to assess how hard to push the builder. Lintelled opening 120mm for 110mm drain. In other respects good builder, but is resistant to redoing the opening. No backfill around foundation masonry there, yet. Edited September 6, 2021 by WWilts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonshine Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 what rigid sheet material would be used? does it mean to fill void (min 50mm) around pipe with compressible sealant, what product would be used? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickfromwales Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) Illbruck foam for the 50mm void, check different types for suitability. The website is quite helpful. Use cement backer board eg 12.5mm Hardi / similar as the closure plate. Edited September 6, 2021 by Nickfromwales 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonshine Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 16 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said: Illbruck foam for the 50mm void, check different types for suitability. The website is quite helpful. Use cement backer board eg 12.5mm Hardi / similar as the closure plate. cheers, it looks like its the FM330 https://www.illbruck.com/en_GB/product/fm330-pro-foam-air-seal/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWilts Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 Thanks. To push or not to push the builder re enlarging the space around pipe. Main consideration is whether the drains will function properly despite the narrower gap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterW Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 Drains will work fine but the BCO may say no …! Not that difficult to sort now, pain in the bum to sort when there are 7 courses of masonry on top. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWilts Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 Probably best to send the builder the BR text and diagram and leave it to him to decide next steps. Done that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickfromwales Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 hour ago, WWilts said: Thanks. To push or not to push the builder re enlarging the space around pipe. Main consideration is whether the drains will function properly despite the narrower gap Do you understand why this gap is a requirement? It is so that ground settlement / movement ( heave ) etc never affect the pipe. Pipes set in without have sheered in half because this has not been observed. It has zero to do with the functionality of the pipe, this is to ENSURE its longevity. Tell the builder this, and tell him to rectify. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWilts Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) Thanks. 120mm width of opening where 110mm drain will pass under lintel from underslab to exterior, while resting on/just above concrete footing. Footing continues horizontally for 600mm external to wall. I suppose there will be a channel drilled into the concrete footing to form a haunch for the drain. Still a risk of movement/pipe breakage? If so, can make an issue of it Measured the openings under lintel, on either side of the partition wall. Left side 140mm, right side 170mm. 210mm would meet BR Edited September 6, 2021 by WWilts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickfromwales Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 hour ago, WWilts said: Still a risk of movement/pipe breakage? If so, can make an issue of it That’s not for us to say It’s your BCO who may fail it, so pass the onus on to the builder VIA EMAIL and state that “on his head be it should it not be passed”. Make sure he knows you will not be footing the bill for any such subsequent alterations to satisfy BCO. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWilts Posted September 6, 2021 Author Share Posted September 6, 2021 Thanks, sent email with para 2.24 and diagram 7b of BR, AND mentioned the logic plus advice from "people who know". Incl suggestions re Hardieback board & Illbruck foam. Upon his head it is now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now