Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After a slight cock up (not mine thankfully) we have one external wall that will have to be narrower than the rest (long story...)

Original proposal from outside was: render, 100mm block, 240mm EPS blown bead, 100mm block, plaster.

For this one wall it will have to be narrower, so builder is suggesting: render, 100mm block, 115mm Kingspan K106, 100mm light weight block, plaster.

 

From Kingspan brochure:

Image preview

 

Both are around about 0.13 W/mK. Just wondering if there are any clever ideas for alternatives that result in the same or better u value and no thicker? 

 

 

 

Posted

For me,that system requires such attention to detail & supervision during the install that you don’t actually achieve the u-value they claim. Think about a bricky on the scaffold cutting those sheets at a tray damp detail,or around a lintol,or even just up to a cavity closer on a reveal. Trust me,there’ll be gaps galore. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
Quote

For me,that system requires such attention to detail & supervision during the install that you don’t actually achieve the u-value they claim. Think about a bricky on the scaffold cutting those sheets at a tray damp detail,or around a lintol,or even just up to a cavity closer on a reveal. Trust me,there’ll be gaps galore. 

 

Yes indeed, that was a large factor in the decision to go with the blown bead.

 

 

Quote

You could upgrade to the silver/graphite? blown in beads to get a better u value

 

Already using silver...

Posted

What about insulated plasterboard? Basically another 50mm of PIR, and reduces any cold ridges through the cavity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...