epsilonGreedy Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 I am doing some room ceiling height fine tuning with my brickie team as the walls go up and can calculate wall-plate height very accurately. Above that the quote for the trusses gives the wall plate to peak height to the nearest mm. What I cannot judge is the thickness of the roof ridge tiling above the truss peak. Is there an industry standard or this? It will be a slate roof probably done in Nu-lok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeSharp01 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) You need to draw it out to scale so you know +/- a few mm or just go HERE, download the DWG file and measure off that. Edited March 3, 2020 by MikeSharp01 typos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe90 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) We had a problem with this as there was a height restriction to our build. As we had no gable walls it would be difficult to prove actual height but we did reduce the roof slope by a couple of degrees as the original bedroom ceilings proved a bit low. In practice (if I remember correctly) the height from top of truss to top of ridge tile was approx 100mm. But even if they got pedantic I believe you have a margin to the actual figure. As we used “angled” ridges rather than half round they fit more snuggly to the roof (and look better with slate IMO). I think it was @AnonymousBosch that used Nu-lock. Edited March 3, 2020 by joe90 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nod Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Add 150 mil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now