Ferdinand

The light in my front porch (stoop in Usonian) just went pop. It has a bayonet fitting, and has been a compact fluorescent om a smash-proof enclosure which has lasted about 5 or 6 years. Do I use a normal domestic compact flash or LED bulb, or is there a special version more resilient to either low/high temperatures, or moisture? Thanks Ferdinand

You may be able to have a conversation and a visit from the BCO just by ringing up and asking; they tend to be more approachable informally than Planning (in my experience), Just know exactly what your questions & ideas are ready for when you talk to them, and have any plans, Streetview Links etc ready to send by email whilst you are on the phone so you can have a good chance of resolving it in one hit.

Or you could get yourself a special fire brigade 😉:

IIRC the minimum reduced with is 2.75m so you are on the edge, and really need to make sure that your hedge is some way back form that. If if is' your hedge, one way is to replace it it with something better than conifers, and set it back further (which may mean make it thinner). If it is someone else's would they let you replace it. On the surface, I don't see why grass car park reinforcement would be a worse idea - it will be absorbed into the grass, and with little traffic would vanish into the earth / grass. Needs a careful reading of your PP wording, a conversation with the Fire Brigade or check of regs, and perhaps an application for a variation of the condition. Present it as something they did not consider? You could point out (or do if they say no) that you could consolidate the surface by legally driving up and down it 19645 times in a borrowed Fire Engine, so it would be better for all if they allowed it to be reinforced in an eco-friendly manner leaving it looking no different and less vulnerable to being turned into a mud-bath in the winter. A further option could be a sprinkler system, which mitigates risk of fires.

Further thoughts - make sure there is somewhere to put and keep sticks upright if there is a pausing place. That may be a rail to hook them over (notch or nipples to retain them in place) and use a trad walking stick like Winston Churchill with a hooked top, or a thing like one of those hold-back-the-curtains hooks we get beside a window. There should be a wrought iron something that is the right shape, or a blacksmith could make one, or a wrought iron gate fabricator will have a curly bit about the right shape. For the rails I put in by my wheelchair ramp and rear shallow steps I put in for mum, I used post and half round fences just knocked in with 2 rails, which cost almost nothing, look rustic, and can be adjusted by a handyman or neighbour in an hour or two, and would need replacement every 4/5 years with a soundness-check at half way. But possibly splinters risk, which on slow-healing hands or skin may be problematic (wear gloves like a Bond villain, or fingerless cycling mitts with padded palms). Also grab handles can be useful if well placed - again external spec. Vertical ones are good for balance (make them 18" not 6-12" so work for both sexes), not pulling up, as they need strong fingers - which is not you 🙃. Horizontal ones are better for that as they can be elbow leaned on. Or loops of rope with can be wrapped round an arm - which may be attached to a portable hook you carry in your manbag. There are infinite varieties of helpful devices, and many are external-grade specced, and some are even attractive. I'm currently interested in accessible surfaces, as I've been looking at our local rail trails. If you need one you call fall on with a soft landing there are non-bound things (hoggin, gravel) and types of things used in children's playgrounds or gyms that they bounce off - such as rubber crumb things, or soft finish tarmac type things. If you plan to be wheelchair-friendly whilst planning to fall over on it with a lower risk of broken bones these are more difficult to roll over, especially manually - of those you probably want the resilient tarmac for that. For hard surfaces Plan B is to wear pads like a skateboarder ! It's all about taking enough, but not excessive, time to think it through, and which risks you want to mitigate and potential costs and benefits eg that more expensive soft surface vs being off your feet with a broken leg if the worst happens, and the consequent long term impact. When I did the bathroom for mum, the main research was thinking a bit, then chatting in situ for an hour with her sitting on the toilet lid. But her career was as a physio in a special school, so she was quite aware herself. I'll stop there or I could go on forever. F

On costs, there are various Govt, LA or charity grants that may be available. But I expect most on BH are unlikely to be eligible for the means tested ones. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/care/housing-options/adapting-home/disabled-facilities-grants-to-adapt-your-home/

@ToughButterCup Your guidelines in the first post seem to be about right. I'd only make the following comments. These are based on my experience with the charity Wheels for Wellbeing for whom I campaign in the public realm, who promote accessible wheeling and cycling. A few links below if you want to rabbit hole. I'm not sure whether your path is "to the front door" or "round and round the garden like a teddy bear". This is a bit related to both, also for future readers. - for widths, the maximum size mobility aid you (or your friends) are likely to be using is a Class III mobility scooter, which has a maximum width of 0.85m (these are the ones with lights that can do 8mph on the roads). The biggest of these are usually Trampers (the SUV of mobility scooters), which are the ones you see for borrowing at larger NT properties and are specced for 1 in 4 slopes in steepness or crossfall. - pay attention to outer turning radius if your path has curves in it. Outer turning circle probably wants to be ~4.5m ideally if you have corners. - A 1:50 slope is great if you can do it. Or for 1:20 you would want a flat "take a rest" bit every 10m or so. Consider a seating area to the side in case anyone might want a rest (especially if you have a steeper part) or to sit with a cuppa to admire the newts. If you do, leave a space next to the bench for anyone to park their mobility aid. The recommended path width dimension 'minimum gap' is usually 1.5m between posts in the public realms. But 1.2m sounds fine in general - 1.5m is needed for more unusual things like side-by-side tandems. For the path to my front door (which is over a concrete path) I did a perfectly good wheelchair ramp by using Wallbarn Adjustable Support Pedestals and Pressed Council Slabs. Wallbarn do things like Megapads to take heavy weights, and optional Universal Joints at the top that let it self-adjust to whatever your needed slope is. I did the 10m run to my front door and platform outside, for around £400 including hiring 2 friends for half a day who have more muscles than me (2018). It wouldn't take someone doing a drag race start on a Tramper - the pavers might shift, but it has been great for what I need. I don't think I've done a blog about this. Make it hose washable to clear debris, and avoid features that will catch accumulations of leaves etc - provide a gap so you can wash or sweep then off the path. On surface, you could do something like scatter pebbles and wash it back, or just score the surface with a trowel when half set. Lots of options. But at 1:50 you should not have a problem. Finally, give a bit of thought on recovery if someone falls over, especially in the circs that they may be alone in the house - that might be having 2 handrails so they can pull themselves up, as well as things like always having a phone to hand or a rape alarm to call the neighbours. Links: Wheels for Wellbeing design guidelines for 'Inclusive Cycle Parking' Sounds off topic, but has a lot of relevant info in a small doc. https://wheelsforwellbeing.org.uk/14-features-of-inclusive-cycle-parking/ Index to their resource sheets: https://wheelsforwellbeing.org.uk/our-campaigns/resources/ Tramper Mobility Scooter with dimensions and specs: https://4zn.f0c.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/tramper_brochure.pdf Public realm recommendations: Guide to LTN 1/20 https://wheelsforwellbeing.org.uk/wheels-for-wellbeing-guide-to-ltn1-20/ Govt Inclusive Mobility standard: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61d32bb7d3bf7f1f72b5ffd2/inclusive-mobility-a-guide-to-best-practice-on-access-to-pedestrian-and-transport-infrastructure.pdf HTH Ferdinand

It's about who you would listen to when thinking about installing a heat pump eg with family, friends, neighbours, tradespeople, organisations, and it's mainly personal data before being invited to do an interview. He doesn't want to know about your erotic life, or whether a heat pump kills your marriage, causes your cats to go AWOL, or causes your date to go BRRRR and get dressed again half way through the increasingly social relationship. 🙂

Good comments, In extremis, or as belt and braces, you could put a porch or canopy on it.

The answer to that one is appropriate regulation, and policing. There are places in the UK this stuff is addressed by the police force whilst mine pretends they don't have the powers they need. And we have a completely open supply of e-mopeds bought under "for use on private land*. There was a case in Cardiff last year where an idiot parent gave their 16 year old iirc teenager a Sur-Ron, and he killed himself and a 15 year old friend on it running at 40mph or so with no training or safety gear. This is about intelligence lead policing, a properly regulated supply chain for e-mopeds sold as "e-bikes", and properly funded police on motorbikes and e-mopeds themselves, rather than numbers slashed and many of the experienced officers gone as happened in 2010-2017. It can be done.

(I'll give a fuller reply to @scottishjohn on the motorcycle thing.) On this, I'm quite uncompromising - 30-50 years of excuses for discrimination is too much, and cannot be tolerated. I'm interested if there are believed to be good reasons - basically, what are the fairy stories they have told themselves? On this one, in this situation kissing gates are not lawful. You may not discriminate against disabled or elderly people in provision of a service including eg a public park or nature reserve. That's the legal duty of the service provider, and the organisation discriminating can be sued under the Equality Act 2010. I'm not clear where the "dangerous" idea comes from. Do you mean dangerous to let a person on a mobility scooter or a wheelchair into a nature reserve, or if the cattle somehow escape, or are the cattle inherently dangerous? I don't see why it should be dangerous for a person using a wheelchair, but safe for a pensioner walking into the reserve, or a person walking their pooch. It's horribly backward thinking, left over perhaps from the 1970s.. The legal requirement is couched in terms of "making reasonable adjustments", and since here an appropriate cattle grid can be installed (as used in the meadows in Cambridge City Centre, for example) there is no lawful excuse for excluding pedestrians using mobility aids. A decision about entering the nature reserve is their decision to make, not anybody else's wanting to impose their opinions. If the cattle breeds chosen to be put in an area accessible to the public are a danger to the public, then they need to change their breed, or perhaps have sheep instead. A further question is whether the nature reserve should be required to provide accessible routes. If they are a charity it is likely to be part of their constitution to do so. If it is there to "benefit the public" or similar, it is no more legal than if they chose to exclude women, or men, or black people. They would not do that - why do they do this? F

Thanks, all.

No, but actually the NT are moving on some of these accessibility questions. Every time I've been to my local property for the last year, I've been explaining how many of their potential visitors don't have driving licenses, and how 200k people live within walking distance, and 400k within cycling or scootering distance. Different story though.

Yes. However we are dealing with emotions, and things like evidence tend not to register. From the point of view of the Council, putting a big stonking barrier "blocking off" a path is a cheap intervention that looks like something is being done. So it counts as a virtue signal. People shut in their own homes for want of nowhere to go don't count in that set of scales compared to a shouty voter. Videos don't make a difference. This is from when I first tumbled to these issues in a way, and then I got radicalised when I couldn't wheel my mum to the Doctor a few years later. One of the lessons I've learnt is to talk from the viewpoint of a disabled pedestrian.

If a Council Department said "yes" to me, it would be gone before the other one had a chance to read the memo 🙂 .