Ferdinand

A question which may get nerdy so I have put it here. It is common for a garden adjoining a road (ie a public highway) to have a minimum public fence height of 1m, unless planning permission exists for a higher fence - or eg a hedge is used. What is the position with respect to a Public Footpath, a Bridleway etc, which are also public highways in law? And what is the position in civil law wrt fence heights next to RoWs such as public footpaths? (There are wrinkles around the edge of this, such as new paths created on estates or otherwise by Councils not being initially dedicated as RoWs, and so being permissive paths of various types, but I'm interested in anything that anyone knows or thinks.) The piccie below is an example of a "squeeze" between housing and countryside. The underlying issue here imo is the rural landowner being an antisocial twunt - the width of these are not often specified, and he has taken for himself everything he thinks he can get away with, turning the experience of the public into a miserable one. This is the "success" to which it is compared. This is the source doc from the Open Spaces Society, the people who deal with Village Greens and Common Land, and PRoWs, which started my train of thought: https://www.oss.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Getting-decent-widths-in-path-diversion-orders.pdf Thanks Ferdinand

Yes. It's from wiki here: I agree with all of that. My point on the Govt would be that we have a very unstable environment, where there are a lot of potential black swans, so they need to be seen to deliver on those high profile commitments that they have made. Which include for two, reductions in NHS waiting lists, and £300 off energy bills (though I'm not clear whether that was in cash or real terms). I'd say that delivering on maybe 4 out of their main 5 targets is the starting point for getting a second term. But also, the antidote to the current grumpiness and tendency towards extrems especially on the right (cf eg the rhetoric of RObert Jenrick and Chris Philp), is the restoration of a society that works and benefits its members after 15+ years of eg Local Government being gutted financially. Regional pricing would play into that - for example for investment by energy intensive industries in northern regions, Scotland and Wales. On driving renewables, we also have the argument of self-sufficieny - that has changed my own view on onshore wind, for example.

Yes - it's from here on Wiki, and that is noted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity#:~:text=The levelized cost of electricity,levelized cost of thermal energy. But @SteamyTea's point that the generation cost drivers may be nuclear and gas may be valid. However two points: 1 - The UK will be having a chunk of our standby / baseload power as SMR Reactors (small modular reactors) where Rolls Royce is a leader, and where we do not know the cost equation yet. 2 - The Sky piece is making a big balloon out of a small story. The actual change is so small (~1% of an annual bill - £22), that they had to leave it out of the subheadline to make the story less small. And that is all they are getting in a FIVE YEAR period: A major component within household energy bills is set to rise sharply from next year to help pay for efforts to maintain energy security during the transition to green power. The industry regulator Ofgem's draft determination on how much it will allow network operators to charge energy suppliers from 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2031 would push up network costs within household bills by £24 a year. These charges currently account for 22% of the total bill. I'd call this a non-story on a media puff wagon to try and scare people. On renewables, the report from the Climate Change Committee 2 weeks ago confirmed that UK emissions are now down more than half since 1990 in consumption based numbers. Politically, I'd say the Govt is preparing to decouple the gas-linked striking price to go regional, which will encourage investment. They also promised energy bills down by £300 by the next Election, and they need to meet that. Nor am I convinced by the "political opponents" of Net Zero RefUK and Conservatives. RefUK are a wind sock not a sign post, and went into quite recent elections with a commitment to non-Zero (eg Welsh Elections 2021), and they have already lost about 28 wheels from their organisational clown car; they just lost their 2nd MP *. Farage will turn his coat like the Vicar of Bray when the wind changes direction. The Cons are still up a creak with no paddle, and no map of an escape route, and their leader is a performing seal trying to make populist noises to out-Reform, Reform - that won't work. I think Starmer can hold this line. Ferdinand * - There's an amusing but very enthusiastic Youtube channel called Political Custard which covers this subject.

A useful thread. I have 3 comments. 1 - For the benefit of future readers (apologies to OP formentioning) these are things that should really be considered before you get to planning permission stage. If it is something that has to be considered later then you end up spending more architect time, more planning consultant time and more planning fees for a second run round the block. 2 - For passive mitigations, I am a huge fan of pergolas of many sorts, including solar roofed. But consider access to upstairs walls and windows for cleaning / maintenance, whether you are going for a strong roof that can be walked on maybe with boards, a light roof so anybody will fall through it to make sure it *can't* be walked on. or indeed a balcony outside your bedrooms. For the latter remember all those Deep Southern houses / cowboy towns in the American Dream, with all round parapets and balconies to keep the sun away. And consider security wrt nimble scrotes or cat burglars (or cats) breaking in upstairs. 3 - As to active solutions, what about A2A heat pumps and solar? I will need to upgrade my gas fired underfloor central heating at some time in the next decade and A2A are the plan, despite having ufh downstairs and enlarged rads upstairs already in place. My ufh is not ideal (only 90mm of PIR insulation below the slab), and I have been running with a portable A2A heat pump unit on trial for a couple of years and my gas bills have plummeted.

On your original query, I think I might be inclined to accept it as what happens with different weather exposure near the coast. Do you know it won't just happen again with the next lot of blocks? I think I would possibly just leave it, and install a large entrance mat * or textured covering over the entire recessed area. It's a place to make sure no mud etc gets in, a place for outdooor pot plants etc, and can just be hosed down if necessary. I'd go for a domestic-looking commercial grade one and cut it to size. Were I redoing blocks, rather than go for pristine in a situation which might be naturally impossible to keep pristine, I might go for a contrast for the recess and eg make the whole thing dark blue (which imo should have been part of the design as they should understand how it will wear). So the block design and colour layout becomes more immune to the effect you have now seen. But then I'm the bloke who does not buy white cars because I don't want to have to wash the damn thing every month. * This sort of thing - an example not a recommendation. /

@wakewaterblue, On your "sand blown through under the patio window last point": My suggestion for the outside gap would be waterproof mortar - that is a specialised product, or use an additive. There may be merit in clearing out what is there already to get a thicker new section rather than just patching - the gap looks narrow. At a trivial level, that could be mix in a good amount of PVA (I have used this eg in small added slabs filling in old chimneys breasts), or something more specialised. Make sure that the surface slope leads moisture away from the house, but you know that I'm sure. To tidy it up you could colour the mortar if you clear it all out, or use a plastic L section over the top, which can be obtained coloured. That should give you imo a 10-25 year repair, done carefully.

Thanks. That helps.

I've seen the other thread on shatafs and Japanese electric superloos, and I'm wondering if anyone has experience with one or the other installed in a house where there is a wheelchair user particularly - but also any other disability? These are in most of Asia, so this happens. But does anyone have experience - I was reminded of a friend with cerebral palsy, who has less eg reduced control over hand movement? Ferdinand

Are there Planning Questions. I can see this issue being a Condition in some way, and being used as quiet leverage by a Council in some circumstances.

There are big flywheels, like this. It's a good thread. I am not sure on the overall picture, though. The Telegraph now being a lobotomised honorary tabloid * which mixes opinion in with invective, and largely ignores the concept known as "news", it's no wonder they jumped on the bandwagon. * I'll never forgive them their front page last year about killer cyclists doing 50mph in thousands of places all over London, using falsified data. The record short course time trial in the Tour de France is 35mph.

Bump.

I am looking at replacing a farm gate with two locking, fold down bollards to provide easy access for mobility aids. Can anyone recommend decent quality items? What will they cost me? The application is that I am trying to make a local public footpath accessible to mobility aids - I can use the Highways Act 1980 to make the Local Highways Authority remove an obstruction, but it will take time and they may fight to keep their illegal barrier. But one other option is to persuade the local allotments society to replace a gate I think they own with locking bollards, which would be better for them and keep them onside. I would happily pay for a couple of these locking bollards, as it may cost me to persuade the council. Photo below. The motor vehicle modal filter is also an anti-wheelchair barrier, and is made out of concrete lorry-blocks from a roundabout. It has been there since 1978 or so. The channel through is about 75cm wide. The policy requirement is for a route through to be 1.5m wide and flat. The allotment people (big site of 200 allotments on the same side as the litter bin) go through the channel with planks across wheelbarrows etc, so are not keen on bollards across the main Right of Way. Thanks Ferdinand

A clip that came my way with Judith Hann. predicting in 1989 what the house of 2020 would be like. They are correct on passive (Passive Haus was being coined at the time - first one built in 1990), energy reduction to reduce fossil fuels (we have not far off halved emissions in the UK), LCD windows, intelligent house and other things. They have a piece of aerogel. They overdo embedded technology always simplifying things, and are wrong on decor, and that Electicity Sockets would go away. But there is no visible cat in the 2020 house, so no passive cat flaps. https://www.bbc.co.uk/videos/cnk55nnnyxpo And the presenter is one Christine McNulty, who was I think visiting a conference at the Windows on the World Restaurant in the World Trade Centre on September 11th 2001. https://www.londonremembers.com/subjects/christine-mcnulty

(There are several lined up for 1 Jan 2027 as well, also unfinished, that you can put in your calendars.) (If you don't behave I'll bring them forward to 31/1/2026 to give you a surprise.)

This is another one :-). Having been on an extended quiet period, my blog has gone beserk. This is one of those "push it into the indeterminate future whilst I think about finishing it" posts from about 3 years ago :-). Ooops.