daunker

Lovely thanks team great news. Exactly what I was hoping to hear. Will look up fitting and manifold instructions in due course but for now will run the five pipes per bathroom, or four I guess if the basin/toilet unit splits the feed which it may do?

I'm converting a building, concrete slab. Then dpm then 150mm PIR in two layers then ufh pipes and 50mm liquid screed. The building is single storey has two bathrooms and kitchen. I'm doing as much as I can myself to save costs. I have read with interest about the hep2O on here and simplicity of it (sounds great). Easiest solution to me seems to run the water supply between insulation layers, probably channeling out the run, (or possibly as is 75mm insulation i could make the small portion of the top layer 25mm+50mm insulation, and run at least the cold supplies side by side. Is this the norm to run in the insulation layer below screed, seems v straightforward hopefully? I hope I wouldn't need it in conduit but maybe? Then leave long tails up in broadly in the location, but certainly where the stud soleplate will go. I have been inspired by here to have manifold and individual supplies for each so no intermediate joints/connections. Most on here are going round perimeters drilling timber studs but I have door ways and limited height so has to go underfloor or be incredibly circuitous and sharper angles?

852x2200mm 'element weight" 89kg Internally will be 150mm PIR then 50mm liquid screed with ufh pipes. So that's the sort of makeup I have hence the course of blocks height, although it's slightly above my ffl. What do you reckon would be best? Door has 25mm threshold so fairly flush with finished floor. Was planning to put a strip of 50mm PIR on the outer face of the course of blocks maybe 10cm high and fix in mortar join as well thought that would help and overlap with the height of internal screed. Ok it wouldnt be taped to the pir on timberframe but it would hopefully help as an additional thermal break to the 25mm upstand internally. Sorry I'm getting sidetracked here. Really appreciate getting feedback from my own project where I just deal with my own voice in head. Thank you. Really value any input

That's good to hear @Iceverge . Most fit the pir to the inside and it did make me worry a bit. All of a sudden the breather membrane isn't going to do much breathing with celotex fixed and taped to outside, but I liked not having it internally. So the timberframe soleplate is going to sit on the block and I've preconstructed it, because having to build back to front. Made panels bit big really should have done smaller for the lift. But be good when they're up. See photo. @Faz that's encouraging but the inner course of blocks is going to run whole way around I think? I just left those blocks off as wasn't sure what to do. I was thinking of maybe getting a couple of marmox to sit in the opening and for the door to be sat on. I think the door requires solid underneath. Was wondering about concrete. There will be 25mm PIR upstand internally to the blockwork for screedng up to. Around window openings I am just going to have timber closing cavity. Ive used the plastic ones with foam before, but I'm really not convinced in real world situation they are very good, very hard to seal. Will be dpc on the face of it and then screwed to frame. This is because velfac windows sit on finished render. I was probably thinking the same of the door opening. Windows will be on straps so back overlaps with the insulation and front is sealed against (but not fixed to) the block. Was kind of thinking doing same with the door? Nb a lot more fixings for pir now. I used a mix of zinc washers and plastic ones I had left over mostly used the plastic ones for joins as they are quite oversized. Wasn't really sure which was best so hopefully a mix will work. 2.4m high and 400m stud spacing 3/4 per stud

Ok so heres a photo. Single course of 140mm blocks timberframe to sit on top. Finished floor level is a little below block height, will be a 25mm celotex upstand internally and 150mm insulation then 50mm liquid screed with ufh pipes in it. Timber frame is 145mm with rockwool between studs then going out 11mm osb, breather membrane, 50mm PIR then 25mm ventilated cavity. I was going to also run a say 10m strip of 50mm PIR externally on inner course of blocks. Is returning blocks like this a normal design, feels a little cold Bridge-y?

This is the outlet yes it flows out fine! Thanks @nod

Just concreted in treatment plant (marsh), and looked inside. The inlet T is below the waterline. It's filled with water and flows between chamber and to outlet fine. But I was just curious about this. Is this how it should be possibly to airlock/gases(?) In my head I was concerned about anything coming down having to be pushed down into the liquid below or it could cause a backup. Ok most stuff should sink, but was just not sure. Thanks!

I'm doing a conversion with existing blockwork. There are two openings for doorways, one ive cut and the other was always open. Internally there is a course of 140mm block that I am laying fresh and then will be dpc and timberframe sit upon this. Outside to in will be render, 140mm block, 25mm ventilated cavity, 50mm PIR, 11mm osb then 145mm timber frame 11mm osb inside and plasterboard. Rockwool between studs. My question is, friend has said on the other opening (no existing external course of blocks) I should return blockwork from inside to out, and on this one I should have returned it. As I haven't I should infill (with concrete). Is this right? Is there another way. I kind of presumed I would just get those cavity closers, I am mainly concerned about cold bridging, but also want to do it right! I'll be running the celotex on outside of timberframe 'long' so that it overlaps the top half of the block, to give some insulation and inside I have insulation and then screed with ufh so again will have a strip of pir around perimeter. I was wondering if I should get some marmox thermoblock just for these openings. I could afford to do a course around the whole building hence using the blocks I have. Fingers crossed someone knows and thanks!

Yeah so mine is a single storey so only like 3mm differential. The tolerance is 12-15mm and sealed with that expanding tape you refer (keep cool before use). It's what velfac recommend. So I think it'd be grand. Just surprised no one suggested it above?

Sorry to bring up an old thread, but I am positioning my windows. And having similar dilemas. Why wouldn't you pull the windows say 30-40mm forward in the first post such that they can be sealed against the stone, but still are fixed on brackets to the timber. The window depth would still overlap the cavity and timber frame and insulation. A compromise but insulation would still overlap so not a horrendous cold bridge. It's what I was planning to do so surprised no one suggested or is there a reason I'm missing?

Was reading on here into the small hours, and thinking why don't I put the 50mm celotex on the outside of timber frame rather than the inside. Ie: existing Block, 25mm ventilation gap, 50mm celotex, breather membrane, 12mm ply, 140m timber frame with frametherm, ply, vcl, plasterboard. Could then insulate the soleplate externally and also the entire Frame? Is there a reason more don't do this?

Lovely thank you, I drilled and chemfixed previously which worked well so will repeat that then 👍🙂

I'm doing a conversion and building timber frame inside existing 140 dense blockwork building I've read about problems with condensation on soleplate occuring. What is the standard block below soleplate. I had been hoping to use thermalite or equivalent. I looked up marmox thermoblock, and they have detail below. Whilst I can see there is advantage to having it below soleplate it doesn't mitigate the cold hitting the front face of the soleplate. I had thought that air temperature on this face might be more prone to dropping below the dew point and does this not have same condensation risk as from below? If condensation is not an issue then I can sort out cold bridge with rigid insulation on internal face of the frame? The thermoblocks are expensive and I was rather thinking that whilst they may be a better option. Is it reasonable to just have thermal lightweight blocks below soleplate. And are there any specific ones recommended. I've read on here of many 'blowing out'. It's only single storey and doesn't support roof etc. Thanks!

Should point out it's just foot traffic outside area won't be vehicles parked/driving on its does that influence the grids, the neighbour has them seems to work for cars

Hi I have an area at back of property which I have put on type 1 and intend to whack. My hope was to slab some of it but funds won't go that far. I was going to put terran membrane down after whacking it and then have been suggested to use driveway (self binding) gravel, rather than clean loose stones (which are problematic to contain and less comfortable to walk on). But Im concerned a self-binded solution won't 'look as good' i've seen the stuff used for paths and seen it puddling in heavy rain and imagine even when damp it'll track into the house. Wondering about a skinnier base and then a top dressing of the 20mm size stones/gravel perhaps with a gentle whack? Or is there a better option. It's about 5x20m so a big area! The other thing is I'm not sure how to edge it, was minded by the modern 'sleepers' as easy/quicker to put down than edging stones and will last fairly well. I appreciate a lot down to personal preference but would really value any insight on it, it's rented out ATM so budget conscious and open to all ideas. Fingers crossed! Thanks

Thanks this is what I'm thinking. Will pick one up tomorrow, and some new pipe 🤦‍♂️

Thanks! Happy days that's what I have- thank you!! I mean it was a swept tee when I said it's fitted the right way around. Outfoxed by terminology will remember that thank you! The first bathroom with the rest bend is the main ensuite one so probably primary anyway. Would have needed a longer pipe length if it was a y-junction required!

I've read the building regs guidance about y junctions under buildings but I think this is where two horizontal runs connect and then not able to rod both. I am converting a building so wanted both bathrooms on the same run as only have to cut the slab once and go under cast founds. Is this ok? I've searched here fairly extensively and think it is. Should I have used a Y and then 45 bend rather than a T triple socket equal junction (it's the right way round) for the second bathroom? Thanks! There's an IC about a metre outside the building. I've Building Control coming on Friday would like everything to be right as I plan to fill with pea to crown as Friday afternoon is wet weather coming. Thanks!

I've read the building regs guidance about y junctions under buildings but I think this is where two horizontal runs connect and then not able to rod both. I am converting a building so wanted both bathrooms on the same run as only have to cut the slab once and go under cast founds. Is this ok? I've searched here fairly extensively and think it is. Should I have used a Y and then 45 bend rather than a T (it's the right way round) for the second bathroom? Thanks!

Thanks I would have liked to. But because its a vaulted ceiling and conversion of existing the height at the entrance/low side, I'm on my limit for allowance with 150mm insulation and screed, plus coming down 50mm+timber. My plan was where the exposed steels from the portal frame are to have thicker insulation, and box around them slightly oversized, somehow making a feature whilst taking out the cold bridge to allow me to run cables up, and then I would just channel out a groove left to right through insulation required for cables to light fittings which would be surface mounted, which I'm planning to be as few as required (ie larger) Is this allowed? My alternative is to perhaps run the lights on wire side to side.

Was just too expensive, and the trial pack of knauf Omnifit worked perfectly. Then got a great price on a few pallets of rockwool rwa45, 'the same' 🙈🤦‍♂️ and it's the one which sags

Have excess black fibreglass insect mesh, will try this! Thank you!

Converting an existing building, I have been putting 140mm frametherm 32 between purlins and then 75mm rockwool batts below. 600mm c/c I have trimmed the rockwool batts. However there is some sag, some worse then others. Due to budget constraints I'll not be able to put ceiling finish (timber not plaster due to building movement) for some time. But I do have the 50mm PIR sheets to go under the rafters. Is it strong enough to support it, or will it flex too much? Suggested number fixings per sheet? Was going to use penny washers/insulation discs. (Also while on topic anyone done a timber ceiling finish, and can suggest any good wood options)

Thanks team, couldn't get better, ended up hiring a van and driving 380 miles to do two pickups from FB marketplace on the other side of the country, bizarrely both within 30miles of each other! After fuel and hire it it worked out at £24/roll for frametherm 32 140mm fitted 58 rolls in a Peugeot boxer lwb. Started popping it in today, rolls don't go far but seems nice stuff. Did consider about an hour into the expedition that I'd have been more sensible to just get the frametherm 35 and be done with it.

Thanks @ProDave I had seen your previous post on it and that price was from them actually.