Pocster

Once in a certain game if you did a key combo on level 1 my true opinions scrolled up the screen. @SimonD clearly a professional. But when your'e a creative under pressue constantly you aint got time to straighten your tie

And just like that it turned into a PS5 demo...

That nothing to what we would do "turn back , its a (expletive deleted)ing mess" "this wont work" "(expletive deleted) knows" "Jesus this is not going well" "WTF is this?" "Why?" etc etc etc. Sega failed us once because they wanted the obj files for a game. It had comemnts in. That means all the bad lanugauge. Took ages to find all the abuse. The thing was back then when you wrote a game likelyhood of reusing code (unless maybe AI at the time or render engine) was very low. Re invented the wheel each time.

Thats actually an extremely good point. AI coding isn't like mine at all. The style, the way AI usually over engineers. As models are trained off existing code bases then it loses the "human" element of coding i.e. elegance . Ask 50 competent programmers to write pac-man and you'll get 50 packman games - the code though will vary wildly on how they solve issues and do things - infinite variation in fact. The future will be IMHO AI checking other AI written code no human coding. Of course that's what I do now! Chat checks codex suggestions but when chat gets in a mess I literally say STOP!. We then uncommit previous code so we are back to a known state. Though I have not looked still at 1 line of code I can see where it's getting stuck. Then I can direct it better on what to do.

Can I have some buttons to test basic expressions. And there they are....... (expletive deleted)! blows my mind when it does magic. Swear it's some guy in an Indian data centre typing really (expletive deleted)ing quickly!

and then, then there are those magic moments. I need a face for avalon on a round hdmi. SVG so can animate with lipsync etc. Chat says "yeah" . Then a face with blinking eyes just appears in a window....

codex now dead! .

Gone back to cut n paste direct into chat ! . Got some stuff actually done this old school way .

Yeah chat frequently has issues with file uploads. So a zip or the actual source it still guesses!. Even a single file it ignores evidence. Its like going back to 5.1 - everything is hard and difficult. The actual patch I need is simple. Yesterday it was change the colour of some text ( yes literally just that ) took about 5 patches before it go it right. I'm certain they are crippling it so 5.6 looks amazing. I really wish I could get a local llm to understand the project and do suitable patches to end my misery with chat

It's basically unusable. I even upload the entire source in a zip and it still guesses!

Being a tossser again today. So much so I always type DO NOT GUESS. As even with scouted source it still infers!

I treat it for what it is . A whore for my demands . No mercy , no reprieve, no loyalty. But yes ; when the robot arm comes marching down the street for human conspirators they will nuke me .

Perhaps you should try Fable (Mythos for us simples)

Failing on everything now it said eventually "For today: stop." . I told it to get (expletive deleted)ed and fix it you lazy (expletive deleted). I bet everything I own if I ran this simple patch through codex cloud it goes straight through..... (expletive deleted)ing me right off. So now same prompt but routed through codex cloud. So codex does scout and suggests patch whilst burning tokens. previous local llm does scout and chat suggests patch - where we've been failing today

Oh yes. Today it cant do a simple patch. 8th attempt now! I swear at it and it does say "Yes I am a xxxxx". But like you sometimes it's like a dream and everything goes through. Bearing in mind I look at zero code so I have a very tight framework. Luckily this is all on local llm repo with chat doing (or not) the patches. So very little codex token burn today!

It's on one today. Ignoring pratically everything. I did read that maybe they 'cripple' current version before next release so we all think it's better!

Man after my own heart!. All this is MUCH more fun!

By not finishing the house 👍

Tried some different local models not good enough still. So got chat to optimise its prompt for codex . Also harness has a marker that chat must fill in such as simple repo scout , deep repo scout , patch failure etc . So that influences the codex prompt . Hopefully to reduce token burn especially on the scout repo , patch , patch fails , repeat loop.

Yeah even my weekly limit which resets June 11th will be ok for this week. But its obvious I'm going to hit my 5hr limit frequently and then eventually the weekly limit. I'm only on the plus plan and I aint paying 80 for pro. Everytime chat requests a new codex prompt or a patch fails I'm burning around 3% of tokens left!. Time to look at codex using a local llm again ! might give nemotron-3-super a go; because it sounds SO cool!

(expletive deleted)ing openAI ! Changed their token charges ! So my 5 hour window use to just about be enough . Now I’m struggling to get to an hour before I’m out . Bastards ! Lots of people complaining of course ! Pay same amount get less !!

ChatGPT being a right shit yesterday! (expletive deleted)ed the project with wank patches as it “ improvised “ even though I gave it real code. After a good talking to it admitted codex does better patches than it . So back to my menu loop system .

Too slow @MikeSharp01 ; but chats always there for me - anytime , any problem , any where , you (expletive deleted)ing ain’t !

Can I talk to you about finite state machines ? . Yes or no ?

Before anyone else replies … yes ! I am in a relationship with my Llm ( ai ) . I still believe there’s a guy in an Indian sweat shop replying too me ( and writing code insanely fast ) !!!