Nick Laslett

I actually think the ones in my picture and link are galvanised steel. Looking at our flashing schedule they called it “Trocal Metal” https://grc.sika.com/dam/dms/gr01/3/010945011000000001_Sika_Trocal_Metal_Sheet_Type_S_eng.pdf I’m not sure why I thought they were aluminium. So ours are galvanised steel too.

“Sika Sarnafil Single Ply Trims” appears to be the magic words. https://cwgsheetmetal.co.uk/roof-flashings-edging-trims/#3 USA website here with lots of detail pictures, which give an idea. https://www.hickmanedgesystems.com/brands/sika-roofing Good video showing how membrane and trims are fitted. https://youtu.be/V7zutZU_Jwc?si=SPFDU7ByOXvNTPGI

@Mulberry View, not the exact same finish requirements, but here are some pictures of how they did our flat roof. Aluminium trims are fitted at the same time as the Sika membrane. The bespoke Aluminium Trim appears to be riveted to the Sika membrane. Then another strip of membrane is glued over the top. Hard to tell, but from left to right it goes: slate tile, lead, aluminium, membrane strip, membrane. For your detail, you would have a bespoke piece of aluminium to cover the curb.

@Alan Ambrose https://www.paulheatrecovery.co.uk/product/filter-cone-125/ Use on kitchen extract.

I find these websites are quite good for colour matching. https://www.colorxs.com/color/bs-18-b-29-blue https://www.e-paint.co.uk/colour-alternatives.asp?cRange=BS+4800/5252&cRef=18+B+29&cDescription=Raven

@Alan Ambrose, it is a very long time since I looked at this (2021), but I believe if you are on an STP, then all the house vent stacks can be on AAV. The STP has a vent to the outside. Mains drainage may have different requirement. I had my drainage design drawn up by Ingent Drainage. All the documents submitted to my BCO by my Architect show only AAVs, and when I had the first fix inspection, that is what he saw installed. Unlike a lot of my build, this is one area where my Architect handled the process, liaised with Ingent Drainage and presented me with a finished design. I had no input. I’m sure there is a much earlier discussion here about AAVs that corroborates the design I was given. https://www.bpfpipesgroup.com/media/73916/Air-admittance-valves-for-domestic-properties-v2-Jan-2024.pdf Some other links:

My windows are all sitting on the EPS cavity closer in the middle of the ICF block. The largest window is 2730mm x 1750mm. They are aluminium frames, with 190mm cills. 27mm thick double glazed units, weighing approx 25kg / m2. Thermohouse EPS is slightly denser than Nudura at 24 kg/m³ vs 21 kg/m³. For reference Marmox XPS shower formers have a density of 36 kg/m³. They have been in over 3 years and seem to be alright.

I’ve mentioned this before, but my ground floor UFH was installed with every pipe run being about 10m shorter than the loopCAD design, essentially missing at least one loop in each room. Unfortunately, even though I diligently took many photos of the install, I didn’t actually notice the shorter runs until many years after the foundation had been poured. One room is particularly bad. Don’t know what the installer was thinking. If you compare the picture to the design it makes no sense. Wrong loop pattern too. I was still very green at this stage of the build.

You have an STP, just use AAV for SVP stack.

I’m sure you are already on top of this, but my understanding is there are specific fire regs that dictate how you finish an attached garage. But I could be mistaken. So PB with 30 min fire rating is possibly required.

This is my best guess, but remember I’m just an amateur like you. What did the Structural engineer’s drawings specify? Their raft foundation design will be based on the structure that is being built and the ground conditions. They would have to incorporate the extra weight of the block and beam floor in the raft design, if that is what is specified. You can discuss this with your Structural Engineer, or talk directly with BCO. You are allowed to challenge your architect. Based on my very limited knowledge, I would be very surprised if you need a raft and block and beam, but I could be wrong. Others with more experience are sure to come along and comment. But not every post gets attention. Sounds like crossed wires, or lost in translation, or missing info. These two gentlemen @Gus Potter, @saveasteading are very knowledgeable, and much better qualified than me, and might happen on your post. Good luck.

Maybe I’m wrong, but isn’t water vapour lighter than air? ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok all seem to think so? Science is not my strong point, so easily confused by these topics. I appreciate our A.I. Overlords can’t be trusted, but I do live in hope.

Here is some more material for anyone that is interested. A short paper by Zehnder comparing an ERV & HRV in the same house in Rotterdam over two consecutive 8 day periods during winter. Doesn’t seem particularly rigorous or compelling, but does confirm the humidity is 10% higher with ERV with colder weather. https://www.zehnder-systems.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/CH/HUB/Mythen_und_Legenden/the_effect_of_enthalpy_recovery_ventilation_on_the_residential_indoor_climate_-_aivc2014.pdf.pdf

Another useful source for why you might want to specify an Enthalpy exchange core. https://www.heatspaceandlight.com/whats-difference-between-mvhr-heat-exchanger-enthalpy-moisture/

I have the Zehnder enthalpy exchanger in my Q600 unit. This decision was based on my understanding that in a large volume house with low occupancy, there was potential for the air to get too dry. See thread linked below with post from @Dan F @lizzie changed her MVHR to an Enthalpy core, due to excessive dry air. Zehnder webinar, with is quite interesting, has Q&A at the end.