Dunc

My garage door installer placed 25mm battens under the joists to allow the door to be fitted now. He is confident that we will be able to take them out (one side at a time) and slide a double layer of plaster boards in later. As its the garage I think I'll just tape and fill, rather than skim.

I'd expect the architect to sort the threshold and FFL. Ideally you'd decide what your floor covering is likely to be so that the architect can make appropriate allowance. eg. ours allowed 22mm for porcelain tiles (+ grout & mat). If you were planning LVT maybe you'd need a lot less. If you don't know yet, best to be conservative (larger allowance) and make it up in screed later if needed. Given your fairly unique situation I'd have thought MBC could generate something generic and allow the architect to sort out the detail before coming back to a second iteration. However, I don't understand how you can have construcion drawings without all the details from someone (usually the architect) that will affect the construction, e.g. where waste pipe runs are (need this for the foundation as a minimum), where you might need to run MVHR ducts (can affect structural members in floors/roofs), what your external cladding is, roof covering, etc etc.

OK thanks guys! Sounds like free choice but a clear recommendation for sturdy stuff for the MVHR, and obs. the 110mm plumbing needs to be very solid (no pun intended). Got about half the ducting in today - @Jolo's picutre is very apt. I will say thank goodness for Posi-Joists. I can't imagine the pain of trying to do this and having to cut holes in the right place as well...we were very close to having I-beams so I feel rather fortunate that didn't happen!

Paving looks great! How did you create the upstand underneath the windows (the ones without the step)?

I have a vague recollection of reading on here somewhere that regulations for strapping pipes and ductwork inside internal walls or between ceiling joists had changed (maybe recently, maybe Scotland only?). Unfortunately my Google-Fu isn't up to finding the post. Does this ring a bell for anyone? This is for first fix work including watste water, water feeds, and MVHR in case it matters. Just received the MVHR ducting which came with a generous supply of plastic zip ties. Want to make sure I don't need to use something else (e.g. metal strap band) before I get started.

When we saw our van it was just on it's wheels; both interior and exterior doors were all out of alignment and wouldn't close properly if at all. Once levelled up they are OK and functioning, although not perfect. Levelling can make a significant difference; so it's possible what you were told was in good faith. But if it's now levelled up and there's no adjusment to be had on the door frame or hinges then as others have said you may need to go back to the vendor.

Great advice from @ProDave there. I did ours this spring with a single 5 ton bottle jack - whatever was cheapest on Amazon. I was working on well compressed hardcore so the jack was stable enough. I tried using blocks and spacers to start with but it turned out to be so much faff I ended up splurging on adjustable tripods. For a couple of hundred£ this made the job soooo much quicker and easier for me (maybe that doesn't bode well for my DIY skills in building a house 🤣). You need the main axles lifted to get the wheels clear of the ground. The jacking points on mine are either side of the wheels. As you have realised you need to put supports under the ends of the van to stop it just tilting too far around the axle while you're doing this. Just whatever you can jam up under there to start with. Once the wheels are off the ground you can work your way along the additional support points (there will be 4-8 along each of the 2 frame members whcih must have supports under them) to get the long-dimension level. These points were marked on the frame, but it's pretty obvious where there will be a vertical member meeting the horizontal frame. Depending on the exposure of your site you may want to make provision for ground anchors. I used four 1m lenghts of angle iron hammered into the ground to chain down the ends of the van. Was very glad of this during recent storms.

Roof on and fully functional. Windows in. Basecourse of blocks under the sole plate have been rendered. Only have breather membremane and battens on the walls; timber cladding not done yet. There is some damp at sole plate but I suspect this is water getting behind the breather membremane at windiw level (no cills yet so water puddling where the cill should be) and running down behind the membremane. No evidence of condensation or trickles of water down the radon membremane updstand though.

Hadn't thought of condensation! Although the upstand of radon membremane is dry to the touch. Obviously no idea what it was like overnight. No puddles outside.

I hope everyone survived the storm! We have some areas of slightly damp concrete around the edges of one room. Can anyone advise if this is a concern? Buildup is Mot1, radon barrier, 150mm reinforced concrete slab. (Eventually there will also be 200mm PIR, slip membremane, UFH pipes and 50mm screed.) I can only imagine that the radon barrier is compromised somewhere around these 2 walls. Only fix I can see is dig up the slab. Which isn't ideal 😞 Other ideas could be lay another dpm over the slab and tape to the existing upstand? Advice greatly appreciated.

Sounds like a similar situation to me: Timber frame on blocks. We've just had the blockwork rendered below DPC (well, after they finished I went around with a cold chisel and made damn sure ALL the render finished below DPC, not just "most" of it 🙄). Vertical timber cladding stood off the timber frame ~62mm will hang down ~50mm over the render. We're just leaving it natural colour. I'm concerned that as the render permanantly exposed to damp (wicking up from the ground) any paint may blister off with time...hopefully the render itself won't blister!

@JohnMo ~150m2. MBC passive kit, but not slab, so insulation and airtightness are passive-ish. Themal bridging not perfect though. Heat load calc from ufh supplier gives 4.7kW at -9. Plumber recommended the 8.5kW pump. Have to confess my calcs using the J. Harris spreadsheet give 1.7kW so there is a decent discrepancy.... If the 4.7kW value is correct then a 5kW pump would struggle to provide DHW in the depths of winter?

Well thanks for the recommendation to check MI @jack. Intreaguingly my installer was half- right. >=100mm from adjacent side walls but >=200 (or 300mm for the 5kW unit - why more for the smaller pump?) from a back wall (https://library.mitsubishielectric.co.uk/pdf/book/EcodanPUZ-WM50-60-85-112VH-AA_Installation_Manual_BH79D849H02UK#page-6-7). So it can sit in snug, but I think we'll bring it forward a good 500mm anyway. What I handn't realised until I read that, is that the big grill and fan are the outlet side of the pump. AFAICT warm air is drawn in the "back" of the unit. In my ignorance I assumed that was intake. So the ASHP exhaust air will be expelled outside the alcove area. Given we're in northern scotland and it's windy 99% of the time, especially in winter, I'm reassured that it'll mix with amient quite rapidly and the MVHR should be fine. I'd love to have had it modelled but as others have said, seems too complex to achieve. Fairly unconcerened about MVHR outlet condensate - it'll be minor compared to atmosphere most of the time (coz it's always raining up here )

Hi all, thanks for the thoughts! Lots to ponder. Just to try to address some of the thoughtful comments: Nothing is fully fixed in position yet but I need to cast the slab for the ASHP soon and the MVHR needs to be installed soon too (so it is a bit too late to make larger chages). The original ASHP position was architect driven and I suspect just because it looks tidy on the plan. ASHP ideally should stay on that elevation as the plant room with DHW cylinder and UFH manifold are just the other side of the wall so giving shortest pipe runs (as @Iceverge just hinted at). The ASHP can certainly move outwards from the alcove; my plumber/installer was the one who said minimum 100mm off all adjacent walls...I upped that to 200mm coz I'm paranoid. But sounds like others may feel more gap is better. Will check Mitsubishi instructions. Another option may be to rotate the ASHP 90 degrees? Bit ugly perhaps. Similarly MVHR box is in the same plant room so shortest runs for intake/exhaust pipes is into that alcove. That wall is single storey so intake can't move any further up. One proposal from CVC is to put the intake on the wall left of the alcove, same elevation. But really this only moves things ~900mm and introduces a world of pain installing through the garage/house dividing wall which of course must be fire resistant and airtight. And the timber claddign on the external wall of the garage is already in place . Interestingly CVC have only suggested moving the intake and don't seem to be concerned about the exhaust. The combigrille is interesting but if we are arguing the ASHP will move a lot of air around having intake and exhaust closer may increase rather than decrease the problem? lots to ponder!

There are several threads which discuss the loation of MVHR intake and exhaust ducts relative to eachother and/or ASHPs but I haven't found an example of a case similar to mine so would appreciate advice: The ASHP and proposed MVHR intake/exhause are set in a small alcove, about 600mm deep. The ASHP will be stood off both walls at least 200mm. MVHR intake is proposed at ~2000mm above ground level, so about 1000mm above the ASHP. Any risk that the ASHP could create a cold microclimate due to the alcove whcih would adversely affect the MVHR?