scottishjohn Posted April 16, 2019 Author Share Posted April 16, 2019 40 minutes ago, JSHarris said: The biggest single difference between dyno readings I used to see on my old hillclimb/sprint cars was down to variations from one dyno to another (these could easily be around 5% to 10% alone). The next greatest variation was from temperature density, as even with the dyno fan running flat out the air temperature at the intake would vary in line with the weather and with how many runs had been done that day. absolutly agree , but that in most cases is down to the operator not setting it up correctly or no baro /air temp correction in the software for the dyno, or not running on light load for enough time to warm up dif+g/box.and many dynos have very poor cooling fans and of course if you were on carbs ,not injection difference would be very noticable ,as no corrections for air +baro possible .std fan that they supplied with dynos were always only meant for quick run up not constant load for mapping an ecu in 256 spots to get repeatable results you need to keep everything the same as is humanly possible . i built mine more as a poor mans test cell with 7.5Kw 3phase furnace fan sat in front of car as well as cooling extractor fans on dyno retarder unit as well as another air extract fan for the whole cell +exhaust extract . there is a lot of heat in a dyno cell to get rid of you would not want to stand outside the car for long with a 60mph wind from furnace fan It was done So I could acurately check the mods we made to our own race car were actually an improvement ,running 1300c class -every bhp was worth the work to find it result 3 years in a row we won the scottish saloon car championship and 2 years the scottish sprint championship with our citreon 1294cc AX sport and also won our class in the 6 hour birkett relay race with 2 other ax,s at snetterton I did this very early on as i found you could not do continuous mapping because of the air temp and engine water temps rocketing and making a nonsense of the map you were writing even with air temp and baro corrections if it was injection early days you had to write ,then burn a chip -then carry on -- which is also why on most maps only a small portion was actually mapped rest was entered manually . for club race cars etc most did not need or want to pay for a full map but for road use then you have a lot more work to do the advent of cheap wide band lambda sensors etc and ecus that you could write directly too changed it for the better ,then being able to enter target lambda maps made it even easier . as you could drive it on rollers -then download the corrections the lambda had logged for partial throttle settings ,then not much time spent for WOT mapping --lot easier on the engine as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Davies Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Getting back to the original topic, I too don't think a thick slab is all that necessary and may sometimes be harmful. In general, I don't think living too close to the thermal store is a good idea. This is a generalization of concerns that Earthship-style designs are not likely to work too well for houses with significant temperature swings with longer than diurnal periods. E.g., the Hockerton houses get cooler than I would be happy with in the winter. Presumably this could be fixed by harvesting more heat in the summer and autumn but the cost of that would be having the houses hotter than would probably be comfortable. A thick slab seems to do three things: 1) provide structure so that localized loads are spread over the insulation below, 2) act as a heat store so that timed heat sources (e.g., solar or E7) can be used 24 hours. 3) act as a buffer to moderate the room temperature. I don't know about (1). I've previously suggested CLT for this but nobody seemed much interested. Whatever, it seems to me there's better ways that don't involve so much embodied emissions. The problem with the slab as a heat store is that there's very little temperature variation which can be tolerated so the usable heat capacity is quite small. This is because there's no control of the way heat comes out of the store. So we're left with it acting as a buffer to moderate room temperature. That's an awful lot of concrete to use to avoid a relatively simple control problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now