PhilT Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 12 hours ago, Dillsue said: Would the 10% inefficiency represent an oversized heat pump not being able to modulate its output low enough to match a more usual winter heat demand and then start short cycling 24/7?? I appreciate that an oversized heat pump might perform better in cold weather if that's what manufacturers say, but cold weather only makes up a small proportion of the heating season. The rest of the time it's mild and an oversize heat pump could be short cycling for months. Do the manufacturers performance figures cover the situation where demand is less than the minimum modulated output? The output ranges in that data table aren't exactly like for like, but it indicates that the larger unit is more efficient across the whole range of ambient temps, so a more cautious approach in selecting the 'next size up' should not significantly compromise efficiency and running costs.
SimonD Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 19 hours ago, PhilT said: It would seem that for modern scroll compressors, for a given range of output, a larger compressor is more efficient than a smaller one across the entire ambient temperature range. This is the Ecodan data table. The Vallant Arotherm+ shows a similar pattern when comparing the 10kW and 12kW to the 7kW model. Up front cost is obviously a consideration. 11.2 "Mid range " vs 8.5 "Max" @ 35°C In kW In kW Out kW Out kW COP COP 11.2 kW 8.5 kW 11.2 kW 8.5 kW 11.2 kW 8.5 kW % dIff. outside temp °C -15 2.7 3.4 6.7 7.3 2.5 2.15 16% -10 2.9 3.7 8.1 8.5 2.8 2.3 22% -7 3.0 3.6 9 8.8 3.05 2.45 24% 2 2.4 3.0 9 9.7 3.75 3.2 17% 7 1.9 2.3 9 10.5 4.8 4.55 5% 12 1.4 2.3 9 10.7 6.25 4.6 36% 15 1.3 2.3 9 11.5 7.05 4.9 44% I do think you have to be a bit careful making this assumption based entirely on catalogue figures and also just a couple of manufacturer details. For example, the Grant Aerona 290 is rather different: @ air 7/water 35C 4kW effective power input = 0.82kW cop 4.99 6.5kW effective power input = 1.54kW cop 4.95 9kW effective power input= 1.90kW cop 4.93 12kW effective power input= 2.53kW cop 4.81 15.5kW effective power input= 3.42kW cop 4.62 This, I think is pretty much the inverse of the table you show?
Beelbeebub Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The rating of a Heatpumps is a bit subjective anyway. Indint think you can generalise. Manufacturers make a series of differently sized machines, but the actual "rating" varies from manufacturer to manufacturer and market to market (due to climate variations) So a 6.5kw machine in the UK might only be 5kw in Sweden and 8kw in southern France. Some manufacturers quote the max power at 7C outside and others at -5C. So the way manufacturer A's range falls might make the smaller units more efficent, whilst manufacturer B's range has the larger units more efficent. As a rule of thumb the bigger the evaporator is, in relation to the load, the more efficent a HP can be and the physics of the rotary, scroll and swing compressors makes efficencies drop off markedly in low load regions.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now