Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, I’m currently building a garden room and have a question regarding the flat roof I plan on installing. 
The room is 5.3x5.3 outside walls and internal walls are 4.7x4.7  
I’d like to know if 8x2 joists @400 centres will suffice over this distance, installing an rsj is not an option for me due to doors and window lintel sizes and positioning. 
Many thanks 

Posted

No, you would need to install 47 x 220mm C24’s at 400mm c/c.

 

What are the walls constructed of?

 

What is the overall height snd how close to a boundary are you?

Posted

Hi and thanks for the reply. The overall height will be 2.5m once the 220 joists and roof deck and coverings are installed. 1 metre away from the boundary. 
So just to confirm I’d be looking at 2x9 for the joists? 
I’ve had someone else tell me that I should be using 3x9, not sure if that overkill, that said I’d rather have it as strong as possible. 
many thanks 

Posted

Using C16 timber, 47 x 220mm (roughly 2x9) will suffice for the clear span you will have and will allow you to be more efficient with your insulation. "3x9" is indeed overkill.

 

If internal height is an issue, then moving to 63 x 195mm C16 will give you an extra "inch" but will reduce insulation performance.

 

You could also use C24 timber, allowing 47 x 195mm or 63 x 170mm.

 

See https://www.timberbeamcalculator.co.uk/en-gb/span-table/flat-roof-joists?load=0.75&class=C16 for C16 and https://www.timberbeamcalculator.co.uk/en-gb/span-table/flat-roof-joists?load=0.75&class=C24 for C24 timber. 

Posted
  On 10/08/2024 at 15:31, DevilDamo said:

Quite concerning how different the tables you’ve referred to differ to the standard Trada tables as the latter don’t confirm your size.

Expand  

Do you have a link to the Trada tables you're looking at? Perhaps the parameters are different? I've assumed access for maintenance and repair only. Are you also looking at the "clear span" of approximately 4.7m?

 

These two links are Eurocode 5 compliant spans (as per Trada);

 

https://www.taylormaxwell.co.uk/uploads/files/D.100.01-01_C16-Span-Tables_Design_Span-Tables.pdf

https://www.taylormaxwell.co.uk/uploads/files/D.100.02-01_C24-Span-Tables_Design_Span-Tables.pdf

 

Posted

Hi, the walls have been made with concrete blocks and there are 2 leafs with a cavity. External wall measures 5.3m on the outside edge and the internal leaf is 4.7m on the inside. Thanks

Posted
  On 10/08/2024 at 19:53, DevilDamo said:

Not a link but I have them saved. None of the C16 tables justify a 4.7m clear span with 47x220mm @ 400c/c

Expand  

I'm lost??? Is there perhaps something I'm misunderstanding in the tables?

 

The first table clearly shows a 5.00m clear span for a 47x220mm C16 @ 400 centres (Table 7.1) and the second table shows a 4.89m clear span for a 47x220mm C16 @ 400 centres (Table 7.3)

Posted
  On 10/08/2024 at 20:33, DevilDamo said:

Incorrect dead load. You need to take the middle section of each table.

Expand  

I suppose we should have asked what the roof make-up would be.

 

Pretty sure when I did the calculations for my roof, the dead load was less than 0.5 kn/m2 for 18mm plywood, EDPM, internal 12.5mm plasterboard, skim, and insulation.

 

Do you have something that would give me some advice on when to use 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 ratings? Is there any specific roof make-ups to dead load comparisons?

 

 

Posted (edited)

I'm clearly doing something wrong or fundamentally misunderstanding the calculations. I've just repeated my roof calculations as follows;

 

12.5mm plaster + skim = 0.2 kn/m2

XPS insulation = 0.04 kn/m2

18mm plywood = 0.1 kn/m2

1.52mm EPDM = 0.02 kn/m2

 

The total for that is 0.36 kn/m2 so well below 0.5 kg/m2.

 

@DevilDamo Am I doing something wrong or misunderstanding some part of the calculations? Or is it just we didn't clarify what the proposed roof make-up was?

Edited by garrymartin
noted as 0.36 kg/m2 and should have been 0.36 kn/m2
Posted
  On 10/08/2024 at 21:28, DevilDamo said:

I was initially comparing your figures to mine… both using a dead load of 0.75 and that is what/why I said they were different. 

Expand  

I think we've inadvertently confused the hell out of @Harry13

 

Harry, just make sure to use C24 timber! 🤣

Posted (edited)
  On 10/08/2024 at 21:54, garrymartin said:

Not sure that helps loads - it's an old document and for Northern Ireland...

Expand  

It’s a current document and physics is still physics irrespective of where you are in the UK.

Edited by ETC
Posted
  On 10/08/2024 at 21:56, ETC said:

It’s a current document and physics is still physics irrespective of where you are in the UK.

Expand  

🤣 Fair comment.

 

Though the tables don't have the same numbers in them... 😉 

Posted
  On 10/08/2024 at 22:00, garrymartin said:

🤣 Fair comment.

 

Though the tables don't have the same numbers in them... 😉 

Expand  

Of course they don’t - they’re for different imposed loads which vary for location.

Posted (edited)
  On 10/08/2024 at 21:56, ETC said:

physics is still physics irrespective of where you are in the UK

Expand  

The force of gravity, and therefore time, changes depending on altitude and ground density.

 

All the granite in Cornwall makes it 20 years behind the times.

Edited by SteamyTea
  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...