MortarThePoint Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 I need to get a toilet pipe and shower waste (plus others but similar principle) out of a room without passing much below FFL. My only thought is to do something like the attached image. It doesn't feel ideal, but is it a no-no? The exit of the bend would then pass through the wall and to a bend 90 heading down. I want to avoid joining the waste pipe the other side of the wall as that is outside and will increase the visual impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markc Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 Not ideal as “solids” could end up going back into the neck of the shower waste and cause a plug. Would definitely be better higher up before the bend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jimbo Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 Personally, i wouldn't use that. I can even believe that is an approved fitting. Problem, waiting to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conor Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 Nope, nope nope. You could change the 90⁰ for a Tee (or a "Y" + 45⁰ bend), with a length of 110mm going to the right, then a boss connecting the shower waste. And a decent fall away. This is all assuming that the toilet is directly above and not dropping from a height. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markc Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 1 minute ago, Big Jimbo said: Personally, i wouldn't use that. I can even believe that is an approved fitting. Problem, waiting to happen. I’m thinking it’s a photoshop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortarThePoint Posted September 15, 2023 Author Share Posted September 15, 2023 Pretty clear cut then 10 minutes ago, markc said: Not ideal as “solids” could end up going back 3 minutes ago, Big Jimbo said: Personally, i wouldn't use that 3 minutes ago, Conor said: Nope, nope nope. I had concerns too, is this better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crunchynut Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 (edited) I agree with points made. You may also repeatedly suck the trap out of the shower waste with the two so close. I don’t think your alternative is any better unfortunately. The Y branch is mentioned is the way to go. Edited September 15, 2023 by Crunchynut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortarThePoint Posted September 15, 2023 Author Share Posted September 15, 2023 2 minutes ago, markc said: I’m thinking it’s a photoshop No it is sold, eg on Amazon, and I can see how OK if waste pointed up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conor Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 This is what I did in our old house. Please bear in mind this was my first ever attempt at home plumbing and a lot of it was correcting what the previous plumber did. But see what I mean re the Tee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortarThePoint Posted September 15, 2023 Author Share Posted September 15, 2023 6 minutes ago, Conor said: Nope, nope nope. You could change the 90⁰ for a Tee (or a "Y" + 45⁰ bend), with a length of 110mm going to the right, then a boss connecting the shower waste. And a decent fall away. This is all assuming that the toilet is directly above and not dropping from a height. Are you thinking like one of these laid on it's back as shown here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortarThePoint Posted September 15, 2023 Author Share Posted September 15, 2023 2 minutes ago, Conor said: But see what I mean re the Tee. Cross post sorry, a good length of 110mm before the tee seems sensible. Not sure I can manage that though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortarThePoint Posted September 15, 2023 Author Share Posted September 15, 2023 In terms of the whole room, here's what I am up against: Room 2.7m x 2.5m ~60mm screed depth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortarThePoint Posted September 15, 2023 Author Share Posted September 15, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Conor said: This is what I did in our old house. Please bear in mind this was my first ever attempt at home plumbing and a lot of it was correcting what the previous plumber did. But see what I mean re the Tee. I might be able to do something a little similar passing the 50mm shower waste underneath the toilet 110mm and the having it change to 110mm for about 500mm before the using a Y on its back. A challenge is that the Toilet pipe ends up centred about 225mm above HCF at the junction so with the about 2.0m of run that makes it 225mm + 2.0m * 18mm/m = 261mm. A bit more to allow fall between Y and the 90 bend exiting the room makes for 270mm. If screed is 60mm and if tile adds 10mm that would put the pan connection at 270 - (60 + 10) = 200mm above tile which is about 20mm too high for most toilets. Closer than I feared it might be though. The bath pipe could offset vertically near to the boss so as to slop flow towards the bath. Can I be sure the boss wouldn't get blocked with poo? Edited September 15, 2023 by MortarThePoint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now