scottishjohn Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 trying to get a design and basic construction that we like and planning will accept take house down to one level -repair all walls replace oak lintels with concrete ones etc parge coat it with waterproof cement then build TF inside +use closed cell foam to finish off the water proofing and air tight seal and insulation and stick TF to granite walls the calculation i have been sent by the foam manufacturer is 100mm closed cell -in two separate layers allowing first to skin then hit with another 50mm + 22mm insulated PB + service void will give walls at 0.25value and with only a small reduction in room size 150mm per wall--maybe 50m of closed cell and then other insulation - but keeping secondary wall to 150mm ok the floor --torn between block and beam -to get easy services and solid concrete Is there much difference in costings ? yes it will be UFH same goes for new roof -which will be a flat one to sit a Tf/sips house on partially second storey and give large balcony areas all round thinking maybe of 6m x10mm and lower level will be 26m by 8m comments and suggestions please need to find a builder to quote for removal of top layer and putting a lid on it my health has gone backwards somewhat --so have to accept i canot do as much as I would like with stone work -- too heavy for me I have thought about flatten and build in ISOTEX -but then I,m sure planning would require it to be cladded in granite and same old type of small windows in bottom layer I do not think i will get away with a total modern build on this site and I can find no one that would want the old granite -so no money back from that --Ihad hoped to find someone who would flatten + remove for all the stone work ballpark from architect to rebuild from scratch in TF what is already there is not on -£850 is his first guess --so that will not it in real world I have to think and I do not need over 400sqm+ then there is still the stable block to do later --maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_r_sole Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 what is the warrant here for, is it classed as a conversion? You just need to be careful on the U-Values depending on how it's going to go through the warrant process. Do you intend to have a SAP calc done or are you relying on the backstop U-Values and heating system guidance in the technical handbooks? in terms of beam and block vs solid, normally it depends on what height you have for a solum and how you are going to support the floor - the other thing you've got to think about inside existing structures is how practical either route is? infilling a large footprint inside existing walls might take a huge amount of labour as it'd probably be barrowed in etc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Jones Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 conc slab will work out slightly cheaper BUT is a lot more work. Block and beam is rapid and you get a perfect flat floor. You have to be concious of sleeper walls if anything internal is to be load bearing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saveasteading Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 Hi, I am new so excuse if this is too late for you. btw I have already learnt a lot from your and other helpful messages about farm conversion. I know about new construction in England, not renovation in Scotland. In situ or beam and block floor? I would say in situ is more controllable, cheaper and more adaptable to change and penetrations. Beam and block is useful if on a big slope as the sleeper walls bring you cheaply and reliably to level. also handy for tricky locations where you can carry all the parts, but couldn't get a lorry. also depends on the dimensions as to how long the spans are and the number of sleeper walls. From looking at some other projects online, I have been shocked at some people breaking out concrete slabs then laying stone instead. If there is a slab or stone at the right level, then this will be another plus for in-situ. Insulation. I tend to go for default air pressure figure, simply to save the cost of the test. Correct me if I am wrong , but for a conversion are we not obliged only to do the best we can? 'Reasonably practicable' having regard to circumstances including cost. Obviously we want to save energy, and do what we can with insulation, but trading the elements is also allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottishjohn Posted April 17, 2021 Author Share Posted April 17, 2021 still no further forward at this time --so nothing been done from small excavations of the floors which have up to 2ft of old roof and floors and plaster on them It would appear that half of the house has solid and half had suspended floors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now