SBMS

Isn’t this codex?

Claude local agent maintains a persistent context history across the project. We use Claude extensively in the department I look after (dev team). we evaluated ChatGPT but its context window at the time was still inferior to other agents like Claude. From memory ChatGPT can handle small to medium repos - think it’s around 100k tokens in its context window. Claude can do about double that and has context awareness of most of our software project. As your project grows you’ll start to see ChatGPT wobble when it loses or refreshes its context and it’ll start hallucinating about generated code. We tried codex back in 2021 but it was a bit limited. Revisited it earlier this year and it’s really impressive - closer to Claude in its context window and can go from zero to app independently. I think there are lots of cited examples of creating software from scratch using ChatGPT, Claude etc. We have been experimenting with generating a document structure with chat spec files in each directory and getting an app generated from iteratively reading the directory structure to generate the app - this has worked surprisingly well.

Copilot I was referring to copilot chat which does have full repo awareness… However if you think ChatGPT is magic have a try at Claude. It has full project awareness.. can execute build commands..dependency installation…build lifecycle etc.

GitHub copilot does all this integrated using chatgpt5. Or use Claude.

Duration: 20 months ≈ 87 weeks. Mon–Wed evenings: 3 h (4–7) — nod only → 3×3 = 9 h/wk Thu evening: 5 h (4–9) — nod only → 5 h/wk → Weekday evenings total (nod): 14 h/wk Fri & Sat: 10 h each per person → 20 h/day combined → 40 h/wk Sun: 8 h per person → 16 h/wk → Weekend combined: 56 h/wk (28 h each) Regular week combined: 14 (nod) + 56 (both) = 70 h/wk 4 weeks annual leave spent on site: assume both worked 10 h/day Mon–Thu as well as the usual Fri–Sun → Per person in those weeks: 10×4 + 10 + 10 + 8 = 58 h/wk → 116 h/wk combined No holidays except Christmas Day & Boxing Day: subtract 2 days ≈ 40 combined hours (10 h per person per day). Calculation Regular weeks: 87 − 4 = 83 weeks Combined: 83 × 70 = 5,810 h Annual-leave weeks: 4 × 116 = 464 h Subtotal: 5,810 + 464 = 6,274 h Less Christmas & Boxing Day (~40 h): ≈ 6,234 h combined Split by person (after subtracting holidays) Nod: (42 h/wk × 83) + (58 × 4) − 20 ≈ 3,698 h Mrs Nod: (28 h/wk × 83) + (58 × 4) − 20 ≈ 2,536 h Answer Total hours on the build (both together): ~6,234 hours or around 890 days (assuming 7 hour day). Roughly 3,700 h (nod) and 2,540 h (mrs nod) Does this look right? If it is, on an average day rate of £225 it’s around £200,378 you’ve saved (£586k total - ~£1400 per sqm for an effective build cost). @nod - what did that cover out of interest? Was that all your materials, decoration, landscaping etc? Does the 420m2 include your garage?

Yes - a waterproof channel is a given. Think it’d be tricky to build up layers as the OP looks like they only want a kerb one set high. If it was two you could slightly cantilever the top one over by say 10mm and run the strip under that to protect it? If you just wanted one channel in side of the kerb with a 10mm rebate for a 10mm aluminium channel you could run a wall chaser through each kerb set before installing?

Build up kerb… angle grind channel in… slimline IP led cob in the channel? 24v feed from backside every 10m?

Useful to know @joth I’ve got two existing Sonos amps and architectural speakers so I’m thinking of keeping those. It’s a shame the loxone can’t interrupt the Sonos for announcements or alarms or doorbells. Other rooms I might put the stereo extensions in and line in to a floor sub. I might put a couple in hall and one in kitchen for the announcements / alarm?

Have been looking at loxone audio server options. I like the idea of using stereo extensions and pairing my own speakers to that - but how would one go about adding a subwoofer to the mix? Did you do this @Kelvin? alternatively @Thorfun did you consider the new master/slave speakers that also have support for a ceiling sub? has anyone used them/would recommend them over the stereo extensions?

Have done 👍

Hi Zelem Yes we have gone this route. I asked the very same question to both the fabricator and Senior themselves regarding the claimed Uw value. They use a standard calculation method using EN ISO 10077, for the reference CEN window. The window size they simulate with is 1.23 m wide × 1.48 m high. This reflects a standard window size as the Uw value is related to the proportion of glazing to frame. Remember - the larger the window, the closer the Uw value tends to the Ug value. We have larger windows than the CEN standard so will tend to a better U value - although we have some spacer bars on some windows that will wash this out. The problem with any claimed Uw value is it relates to a number of related components that won't reflect your window; and therefore all they can do is provide a reference size so you can compare between manufacturers. The calculation of the Uw value (I looked it up because I wondered) is actually remarkably straightforward. You need to know the u value of the frame, the glazing and the dimensions of the thermal transmittance strip. One of the reasons Pure's Uw is low is they use PUR -polyurethane resin (~0.022 W/m K) whereas many other manufacturers use Polyamide (~0.30 W/m·K) thermal break. Thats an order of magnitude improvement in thermal conductivity. PUR is already commercially proven in large systems. So with this assumption, is their Uw claim reasonable? On average the frame area is around 15-25% of the U value heat loss, so the thermal break is going to improve the Uf value by around 30-40%, so I'd be looking at a reduction of around 0.2–0.5 W/m²K for a Uw value. That pretty much checks out with the difference between their standard Polyamide broken windows, and the Pure windows. Without independent verification then (which few glazing providers bother with because of the challenge of different window makeups - and the fact that the reference CEN window calc is pretty simple), you're left with looking at the reliability of the fenestration provider itself. Senior are prevalent in higher specified commercial glazing - not massively prevalent in domestic glazing. I see this as a benefit - they're a 34 year old company, which imparts a good degree of confidence. Check out the NBS Source Case Studies (https://source.thenbs.com/manufacturer/senior-architectural-systems-ltd/dVSDoRHE7zaprhEbgnigyf/case-studies). They've installed Pure in Grantley Hall Spa & Hotel, the main welcome building in RHS and the Castle Park View scheme in Bristol - tallest residential building in the city and it achieved level four standard in the Code for Sustainable Homes certification. These are the typical installations Senior does - high specification, high end commercial glazing. I think they are one of, if not the, largest privately owned fenestration provider. We're not talking safestyle UK here. Do I trust that they are putting PUR not Polyamide thermal breaks in? Yes. So from this, do I trust the claimed U value of the window? Yes. Did I look into Senior (£50m annual revenue last year, profitable, well reviewed?) Yes. Are the windows fabricated to a high quality? Well that's down to the fabricator selected which I can't comment on, but I visited the factory where our fabricator is based, spoke to their MD, spoke to a seasoned installer who has had no issues. So all in all, I'm pretty comfortable with the claims and my decision.

I think they’d have a hard time justifying commencement just with presence of machinery. If you weren’t actually using it in the context of commencement of development (which is defined in the t&c act) it’d be a hollow challenge. CIL commencement is defined by the acts definition of material commencement. So demolition works, digging trenches for foundations, pipe laying, road layout etc. ‘digging holes’ would trigger commencement if those holes were clearly in relation to the development the CIL relates to.. I would always submit a start notice anyway there is literally no reason not to!!

Ah didn’t realise that was who was offering the 30%… Why sell though?

Our joiner did it. Stapled a bit to hold but then the battens are the actual thing that mechanically fixes the membrane to the sarking. The staples are almost temporary and I think could be skipped if it’s a still day and you’re battening as you go??

Why did you sell @nod? Why not take the 30% uplift guaranteed?