Repairing or replacing old floorboards to remove bounce

[paro]

Hi All - I am starting to fix up the inside of the old cottage now, nothing too heavy really just sanding painting and carpets really. That said the floors upstairs are in poor shape and was looking at ways to take out some of the flex in them. The first floor sits on top of a mix of flooring (all timber) with the weight bearing on some very old oak beams (probably original given the state of them). The top layer of this hodgepodge of timbers are some newer looking regular looking floor boards. The issue I have is these either have to be replaced or repaired and I'm not sure repair is an option.

 

My current thinking is to rip them out and replace with some 18 or 25mm ply in the hopes that load would be spread out and reduce the flex but having never done this I am not sure what the best way to go is.

 

Thanks, Paul

[ProDave]

Pictures?

 

Are you concerned with "flex" as in the floors have sagged over time?  OR "flex" as in you can see them bend and flex as someone walks on them?

[saveasteading]

2 hours ago, paro said:

replaced or repaired

More info please on the dimensions and materials of the joists, and of the floorboards.

Also the centres of the joists. Approximate will do.

 

Is it deflecting worryingly or simply uncomfortably?

As a guess do you think it is perhaps a few mm or more than that?

 

Presumably the bounce is greatest at mid span of the joists. Can you test that please, as it should be much less nearer to the ends.

 

I had this in an old house, and it would have been bouncing for centuries,  but is no longer what we expect and we had to get building regs on it for some reason I can't recall.

So the answer was to replace the floorboards with structural ply fixed with lots of nails  (but it could be screws, which would make it removable.)

This turns the composite result into  a series of T beams, where the plywood acts as a flange on top of the joists, and is massively stiffer. Floor boards do not do this.

It is a calculatable thing. and needs lots of fixings. From memory we had ring-shank nails at 100mm centres.

 

We should cherish old structures, but replacing the boards is usually acceptable.

 

This is not difficult to do, but I'd advise getting professional (Structural Engineer) input as it isn't reversible without damage, and there may be other issues.

This may also aid selling-on as a good Surveyor may notice it and want proof of the integrity.

 

[paro]

I should have given more info. So supporting joists (oak) are circa 18" apart. Looks like unlike the other room that I decorated a couple of years ago this floor has a differnt construction.  Room is approx 3m x 2.5m.

 

The floorboards are laying directly onto the beams shown.  The floor has always had a lot of flex/movement. Not in a concenred its not safe way, just more comfort and noise. I think it's a combination of the deflection in the boards and them moving around because they are not as secured to the joists as they once would have been. There are a few damaged ones as well which I am guessing is due to them being lifted  over the years for plumbing and eletrcial works which are running through the room.

 

There is no noticeable extra deflection in the middle.  I suspect its always been a bit bouncy since that part of the building is going to be a couple of hundred years old at least.

 

 

 

 

[ProDave]

Those joists are not very big and quite possibly full of woodworm.

 

My BIL lives in a 300 year old Welsh farmhouse like that.  All the rooms have a permanent dip towards the centre of the room and they all move as you walk on them.  But the surveyor summed it up verbally to my BIL (not what he put in writing)  It was built 300 years ago out of rocks and s**t, it hasn't fallen down yet and unlikely to fall down any time soon.

 

Another friend who had such a house lived the first 5 years with an Acro prop in the middle of the living room because he did not believe the floor above would take the weight of a double bed.  It did not collapse when he eventually removed it.