Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Getting structure quotes in for our 180m2 single-storey self-build.  We've got vaulted ceilings which is complicating things a bit.  The quotes are varying between £400 and £800 per m2 to get to u-values of 0.12 walls, 0.1 roof.  

 

One quote I quite like is Turner Timber's Super Advanced, which seems like a good price, and uses 254mm Easi-joists with 11mm OSB over for the roof, so no purlins intruding into the ceilings and potentially lots of room to run MVHR ducting and other services through the Easi-joists.

 

Question is: should we insulate

  1. Between and under the joist, which loses the service space benefit, or
  2. Go for a warm roof with all the insulation on top, or
  3. Between and over, say 100mm PUR between and 150mm over (is that still a warm roof)?

 

The roof will be a standing seam zinc so if we go option 1, we'll need membrane, 50mm battens, 18mm OSB or ply on top.  VMZinc say you don't need that for a warm roof so is that a saving?  

 

Of course, I'll be asking our architect, who I rate, but fear I could be paying him £££ per hour to research this out, so if I can steer him in the right direction... 😉 

 

Any views?

Edited by Benpointer
Posted (edited)

Over is the easiest to do, but if not careful can make roof look a bit clunky. But you still need to insulate at the outside wall to bridge between wall and roof insulation.

 

Between - Any solid insulation such PIR between is a bit of a non starter. How do you go between the metal webs.

 

Blown insulation, tried to cellulose but they wouldn't do it for some reason.

 

My roof is similar, I did counter battens spaced away from rafter 50mm to drop ceiling down 100mm, to give 356mm cavity and spray foamed. Then a reflective vapour barrier and 50mm service cavity then plasterboard. Drape the vapour membrane onto wall and use airtight mastic/glue to stick to wall or tape if a membrane.

 

IMG_20210415_114726.thumb.jpg.7df4b19c6e911d684e271cfcb65ee96b.jpg

 

IMG_20210217_113746.thumb.jpg.801d48c7984a36ee4515048d09223459.jpg

 

 

 

110244194_IMG_20210506_1407482.thumb.jpg.387b74daa1bd04a2157dd49563160ed0.jpg

Edited by JohnMo
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

That style of roof is just calling out for blown in cellulose / eps beads / wood fibre no? What is the wall structure out of interest?

Edited by Alan Ambrose
Posted
3 hours ago, Alan Ambrose said:

What is the wall structure out of interest?

Wall structure is as per this diagram but we're cladding in cedar / cement boards & render rather than having a masonry skin.  Either 50mm additional PIR for u = 0.12 or 100mm for u = 0.09.

 

TT-SuperAdvancedFrame-New.thumb.jpg.c92d067b6721085909bae2b84cf1f4df.jpg

 

 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, JohnMo said:

 

Between - Any solid insulation such PIR between is a bit of a non starter. How do you go between the metal webs.

So, I am thinking there will be a calculated u-value from, say, 100mm PIR between the joists with nothing within the joists (i.e. between the webs), then say 150mm PIR over the joists.  Sure it will be less than full-fill 100+150 PIR but better than just the 150mm over the top.  

 

Presumably could be calculated for the whole roof by calculating the % area with PIR versus % of unisulated joist.  For 97mm joists at 600mm centres that's 83% PIR at 0.22u and 17% 47mm joist at 2.55u = 0.6u...  Then add the 11mm OSB and 150mm PIR on the top to get an overall u of  0.11. 

 

Still, it might be easier/cheaper to simply put 200mm PIR on top and forget insulating between the joists.  

 

I don't want to full-fill the easi-joists because I'd like to thread services including MVHR through them.  I am mindful of making the roof look very clunky though.

Edited by Benpointer
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 22/02/2025 at 09:36, Alan Ambrose said:

That style of roof is just calling out for blown in cellulose / eps beads / wood fibre no? What is the wall structure out of interest?

We're now investigating blown cellulose (254mm), with a layer of PIR on the warm side to get us to u = 0.1. 

 

However, the Warmcell distributor (PYC) are recommending that we'll need Smartply Propassive on the inside and Medite Vent on the outside, which would add £20 per m2 to the roof cost and that's before we factor in the cost of the blown cellulose itself.  

 

Given we will also have to have a 50mm ventilation gap then 18mm ext ply above the roof to take the zinc we would end up with 3 timber board layers in the roof: Smartply Propassive, Medite Vent and 18mm ext. ply.  

 

That seems like overkill to me - not sure why we can't go with a suitable VCL below and 9mm OSB3 above the cellulose.  Ubakus certainly seems to think it's ok:

 

Screenshot2025-03-06at20_21_33.thumb.png.872c88678ae91136f3db4796d8e7230d.png

 

The alternative might have to me mineral wool between the rafters rather than cellulose, which is a shame as I like the idea of blown cellulose. (-:

Posted

T

50 minutes ago, Benpointer said:

We're now investigating blown cellulose (254mm), with a layer of PIR on the warm side to get us to u = 0.1. 

 

However, the Warmcell distributor (PYC) are recommending that we'll need Smartply Propassive on the inside and Medite Vent on the outside, which would add £20 per m2 to the roof cost and that's before we factor in the cost of the blown cellulose itself.  

 

Given we will also have to have a 50mm ventilation gap then 18mm ext ply above the roof to take the zinc we would end up with 3 timber board layers in the roof: Smartply Propassive, Medite Vent and 18mm ext. ply.  

 

That seems like overkill to me - not sure why we can't go with a suitable VCL below and 9mm OSB3 above the cellulose.  Ubakus certainly seems to think it's ok:

 

Screenshot2025-03-06at20_21_33.thumb.png.872c88678ae91136f3db4796d8e7230d.png

 

The alternative might have to me mineral wool between the rafters rather than cellulose, which is a shame as I like the idea of blown cellulose. (-:

This sounds like the conversation I had about cellulose, they wouldn't even quote until I had all the drawings changed to suit what they expected. So zero idea of costs without going back to architect to amend drawings - so moved on.

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, JohnMo said:

T

This sounds like the conversation I had about cellulose, they wouldn't even quote until I had all the drawings changed to suit what they expected. So zero idea of costs without going back to architect to amend drawings - so moved on.

Tbf they seem to want to insist that the inside layer SD value is >= 5x the outer layer SD value.  Our outer layer is likely to be 11mm OSB/3 with an SD of 2.5.  So we just need a VCL with an SD of > 12.5 or more.  DuPont AirGuard Reflective has an SD of 2000 so should more than be sufficient.  

 

I have put that build-up to PYC to see whether they are ok. The problem is on Ubakus that build up gives an insufficient drying reserve.🤷‍♂️

Edited by Benpointer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...