Cookie Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 Hello! Our timber frame is going up and is at roof stage. There are 2x steels in the ceiling of the first floor, these both rest on external 140mm walls for support. Those steels are bases for steel triangles which are in the attic/roof space. The 2 main horizontal steels, on the timber framer plans, their ends rest fully on the walls so 140mm end of a steel is on the wall. This is at either end, and the rimboard on the plans is removed in those areas. However, in reality, on site the ends of those steels only rest on the walls at approx 95-100mm and look short. The rimboard is still in place there. The site manager says 100mm is the minimum they must rest on the support wall, so it's fine. Can anyone direct me to the actual building regs which state this? I've searched online and cannot find anything to support the 100mm. (No pun intended!) Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 You should ask the engineer who specified the steel. The building regulations are not so prescriptive, however NHBC guidance does specify a minimum of 100mm for steelworks bearing lengths and it is a reasonable rule of thumb https://nhbc-standards.co.uk/6-superstructure-excluding-roofs/6-5-steelwork/6-5-4-installation-and-support/ I would have more concern that the wall is being loaded eccentrically but again this would need the engineer to confirm it is OK. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Posted May 3, 2023 Author Share Posted May 3, 2023 Thanks, George. The engineer is not coming to look at it, he's instructing from afar as he's the timber framer engineer. I'm suspecting it truly need him onsite to get a proper inspection done. We actually believe the house is 80mm bigger than it should be front to back, and this accounts for the 40mm discrepancy at either end of the steels. It's a bigger problem - but the steels' bearing is one aspect I need to add to my arsenal of info! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 Steel fabricators and/or the builder really should be taking site measurements prior to fabrication. Ditto with the timber frame fabrication. There are a couple of fixes - either needs to be properly approved by the design engineer, the steel extended (site welded if necessary), or the wall altered. Or a combination of these options. I would imagine that the engineer would say it's OK but you need that confirmation from them. This would be acceptable remotely if they have a full understanding of the issue (photos and written record). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrerahill Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 1 minute ago, Cookie said: The engineer is not coming to look at it, he's instructing from afar as he's the timber framer engineer. I'm suspecting it truly need him onsite to get a proper inspection done. Take photos with a measuring tape in place to show bearing length and email over. Depends who made the mistake the if TG engineer and the installer both work for the same company you might find, unsurprisingly, it will be "fine". The steels should really have been ordered from site measurements to solve issues like this, or an absolute guarantee the build would be done to correct dims and this imposed onto the builder, but even then, things slip. Options may exist to rectify, in fact I am sure they do, but you need to get this looked at properly now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Posted May 3, 2023 Author Share Posted May 3, 2023 Thanks very much for the advice, I'll get back onsite taking more photos and speak to the timber frame engineer. Much appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Jones Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 150mm is normal bearing for steels, but as George said your probably fine just get signoff from the eng. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Punter Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 With TF 90mm often seems to be acceptable for steel bearing. Maybe it is because TF used to be 89mm everywhere and still is for internals and party walls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Posted May 4, 2023 Author Share Posted May 4, 2023 22 hours ago, Mr Punter said: With TF 90mm often seems to be acceptable for steel bearing. Maybe it is because TF used to be 89mm everywhere and still is for internals and party walls. Thanks! Measured and they're 85/80mm supported so will have to see what the TF guy says about it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr rusty Posted Tuesday at 17:14 Share Posted Tuesday at 17:14 (edited) The NHBC guidance says minimum of 100mm beam support https://nhbc-standards.co.uk/6-superstructure-excluding-roofs/6-5-steelwork/6-5-4-installation-and-support/ Apologies to @George - I see this has already been posted...... Edited Tuesday at 17:16 by mr rusty duplicate info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now