flanagaj

I've heard that they can be sneaky too. They give you a good price on one item and then you find that you get stung on another. Having to haggle every time you need a quote wears thin after a while.

As someone who worked in the building industry many years ago and has had the displeasure of having to deal with the builders merchants random price generator, I am trying to deduce how I can avoid getting ripped off when we come to start our self build. As we are on a very tight budget, I am going to source the materials and only use trades that I have to (brickie, electrician and plasterer) most of the other trades I intend doing myself. Do people literally get their plans quantity surveyed and put the whole supply out to a single merchant, or are you better to buy stuff as you need and spend time trawling the internet and ringing around? Thanks

We are hopefully going to get a decision shortly on our PP. The LPA haven't given much away, but have mentioned no objection in principle. We know we've got to go to committee as a result of the max objection threshold having been met. Late last week we received an email regarding conditions attached to the grant 'If' planning is granted. Do these conditions get sent regardless of whether the LPA has already decided that PP is going to be refused?

I thought it might be quicker for building a 20m wall of vertically installed sleepers, but having looked into it further though, the mix / flow rate does seem to be pretty low.

They do all seem to use Quikcrete, which I think is pre mixed.

I came across the Mux Mixer on Facebook Marketplace and I did think that it looks like an interesting bit of kit. Portable & Electric Concrete Mixer | MMXR-3221 | MudMixer® Has anyone looked into these or found something similar for the UK market?

The garage is a flat roof and I want standard cavity walls for the garage as well. Plan was to also to use strip foundations.

"Has your architect dealt with the sloping floor of the garage, to cope with fuel spills, or another method such as a bund (reduced floor level) to meet compliance at the wall party to the residence?" Haha, I doubt that very much!! I wasn't aware that there did need to be a sloping floor away from the house. I was planning on doing the footings myself. It's not rocket science and I have a good laser level and would simplify matters by hiring a pump truck when they are poured. But do i actually need to have a step in them? Can they not be all one level, and it just means that there are more blocks used to come out of the ground for the garage section?

Our proposed dwelling is as below (the steps down will be where the man is). The garage floor level is 400-450mm higher than the floor level in the house and I am trying to understand how to do the required excavation / concrete pour. I was not planning on using beam and block due to the spans. As a result, is it simply the case that the outer wall of the house that adjoins the garage will have to have some sort of tanking to stop damp or should I go beam and block in the garage so that the oversite is below the dpc level of the house?

There is no CIL for single dwellings with Hampshire CC. The VAT point is a good one though and I had not considered that.

I'm getting tired of waiting for the LPA to decide our revised application. Just seems like unnecessary box ticking by the various consultees and I want to get cracking. Given we already have PP for the previous grant (conditions not discharged) I want to know whether I could make a start preparing the site. Eg, put in retaining wall, install STP / drainage field and get utilities/ hard standing in for mobile home. Crawling up the bloody wall waiting. No wonder so few houses get built in the UK

Yes. We gave them notice last October.

Anyone able to shed any light on this. So we met SSEN Wayleave department on site at the end of January to try and agree that they can keep the pole on our land, but we want it moved to the boundary. They were receptive to the idea at the time of the meeting and provided a diagram showing where we wanted the pole. Apart from that we have heard nothing more. We just received a letter from the Wayleave department. I have no idea how to reply to this, as nobody has actually told us whether they are going to move the pole for free of whether it will be at our expense. If I am correct, I don't think there is anything for us to do as we have not heard from their regarding their proposal? "ELECTRICITY ACT 1989: PARAGRAPHS 6 AND 8 OF SCHEDULE 4APPLICATION BY SOUTHERN ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION PLC (THENETWORK OPERATOR) FOR A NECESSARY WAYLEAVE TO RETAINELECTRIC LINES ON LAND AT THE BUNGALOW, ***** OWNED AND/OR OCCUPIED BY ****** .The Network Operator has made an application for a necessary wayleave to authorise them to keep installed electric line(s) at the above land. Having reviewed the application, we can confirm that it is valid. It has been allocated the above reference number which should be quoted on all future correspondence. We encourage all parties to correspond with us by email -necessarywayleaves@energysecurity.gov.uk.The Network Operator should send you a copy of their application and any accompanying documents to you. If you have not received a copy of the application documentation, please contact them as soon as possible. The application was submitted following receipt of your correspondence of23/10/2024, which was treated as a Notice to Remove (NTR) the line(s).We note your NTR stated: We would like to give formal notice for the electricity pole on our land at **** to be removed. The equipment applied for by the Network Operator is as follows:230v Overhead line with 1 x wooden pole. If any of the above details are incorrect please contact us immediately. The Network Operator has indicated in their application that they are still negotiating with you and have requested that this application be held "in abeyance" pending the outcome of negotiations. We strongly encourage the parties to reach a negotiated DESNZ Ref: 12.04.09.06-5320UYour Ref: HP520368Doc Ref: 1389426 Page 1 of 2 settlement wherever possible, an application will only be held in abeyance if agreed by all parties. In view of the Network Operator's request, we are seeking your thoughts on the status of the negotiations and whether you agree with the abeyance request. Please can we have your response, in writing, no later than 11/04/2025. If we do not hear from you we will assume you agree to the Network Operator's abeyance request. You may wish to seek legal or other professional advice before deciding whether or not to consent to the abeyance request. We are not able to give any advice as to whether you should consent. If you agree to the abeyance request, we will review the position periodically to ensure that negotiations are continuing. If, before that time, you decide negotiations have stopped or stalled you can request that the application be taken out of abeyance at any time. Once an application is out of abeyance we will progress the application, initially seeking views on the most appropriate procedure. For further information, please read our necessary wayleave guidance which sets out details regarding the choice of procedure and abeyance:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/granting-a-necessary-compulsory-electricity-wayleave-guidance-for-applicants-and-landowner-and-or-occupiersShould you have any queries please contact us at:necessarywayleaves@energysecurity.gov.uk"

How would you go about sanitising it though, before storing rainwater in it?

Moving it was more about having the meter to the side of the driveway as opposed to having a black water meter housing stuck in the sand coloured driveway. Purely aesthetic reasons.