FM2015

Paperwork 🤣 Honestly, not really sure. Obviously Nudura are pushing their dryvit brand. Different adhesive properties on different densities of background.

I would check that anyone providing warranty/BC is happy with k rend on Nudura. Seems to be a different edict every month on renders.

Dryvit is a render system rather than cladding??. There is a lot of cross selling with "do it our way or else" flying around. Hence why I suggested warranty provider and cladding manufacturer as points of contact. Neither are selling something the OP hasn't the intention of buying.

Three people to consult. 1. ICF manufacturer 2. Building control/warranty provider 3. Cladding manufacturer specifically with regard to ICF. Potentially not in that order.

For icf application?

Not getting into an argument but the Nudura alignment system and access platform is designed to go on one and four so that you can board(3 board configuration)into the corners with both directions fully supported. Obviously, if you didn't use the platform, it's a moot point but not sure why anyone would advise differently. I know what it says in the manual and got over 100 pours under the belt. Only trying to help for your next pour.

Web 1 in one direction and web 4 in the other on internal corners. First web on both sides for external corners although there's no hard and fast rule on external corners.

Did you not have on site support from the supplier? If this was your first pour surely they or an experienced installer was overseeing? If nothing else to get it signed off??

No one seems to have mentioned cavity layer. Nhbc and labc insist on cavity drainage behind brick and stone fascias. Not sure if it applies to slips. Stone, 100mm on the bed, with ties to webs at appropriate spacings. Nearly everything we have ever done has had some stone faced element. Icf brickledge isn't required but it can simplify things. It can also complicate them.

Timber instead of EPS, shotfired to flange plate, with the vertical EPS elements extended (or left long) to cover the timber. And create a check reveal along the head. Almavert do a product which could be used instead of timber. Illustration suggests Jackson being used. Their end panel could potentially be fixed to the flange plate. All could be done pre or post pour.

This just seems like a massive waste of time to save a few quid to get to an end position easily achieved using existing, certified methods, whilst potentially introducing risk into the pour element. Sorry. Might be missing something.

Whereabouts are you and what quantity do you need? We have just put some onto a site in Cornwall

Or whack some type 1/803 down as a base? It should be fairly dry as the ground level outside is lower than the potential dig out level. Damp is 90% condensation. At this stage, I don't have any concerns with excavating right next to the wall. Famous last words🤣

Thanks, Ufh isn't viable in my scenario I guess my over engineered solution was only to provide a more stable base but I guess the screed does that job.

I have an 1800s farmhouse and in a couple of rooms, there are the original slate flagstones laid most likely directly on the earth. They do let a bit of damp through along the joints and obviously attract any condensation due to the underlying temperature. I'd like to keep them and make some repairs/replace some. I've bitten the bullet and decided to get a micro digger in so that I can lift them all up, dig down and lay an insulated floor before reinstating the slabs. Question is, what would be an appropriate floor build up/structure? My first thought was concrete, insulation and screed with dpm underneath, lapped up the walls, with slabs over bedded in kiln dried sand to level. Not sure I'd get the slabs level if I mortared them down. The slabs are smooth but uneven, it's an old house, but the joints are pretty perfect. Any help or advice would be appreciated. Tia