Pocster

ChatGPT being a right shit yesterday! (expletive deleted)ed the project with wank patches as it “ improvised “ even though I gave it real code. After a good talking to it admitted codex does better patches than it . So back to my menu loop system .

Too slow @MikeSharp01 ; but chats always there for me - anytime , any problem , any where , you (expletive deleted)ing ain’t !

Can I talk to you about finite state machines ? . Yes or no ?

Before anyone else replies … yes ! I am in a relationship with my Llm ( ai ) . I still believe there’s a guy in an Indian sweat shop replying too me ( and writing code insanely fast ) !!!

I tell chat it’s a useless (expletive deleted) and it replies “ I am a useless (expletive deleted) and you are right to be pissed at me “ . I then tell it “ grow a vag and fix it “ . It’s a love hate relationship . What’s bizarre is it’s not about the code anymore it’s about doing it correctly. After all I’m angry at its method / logic not its code because in under 30 seconds that can be fixed . It’s all a bit strange still

right bast today. been dragged down many a rabbit hole of things it created and patches to fix patches to fix patches to fix patches - which are (expletive deleted)ed

chat back to bollocks today as it recreates half the IT infra structure in the world.

I’m sure . Chat yesterday was the fastest I’ve ever experienced it . Whether it’s the same today or not I’ll find out later .

Chat absolutely on fire today ! SO fast ! . Responses in seconds rather than minutes . File downloads happen within 10 seconds . Blazing ! . By-passed codex and my menu today as we were only dealing with same 4 files . Significant progress ! . 2nd uma8 really helps even with background radio on as we get 2 whisper transcriptions .

(expletive deleted) me ! How many turn ons in just a few sentences!

Maybe 5.7 ? 🤔or 5.8 ? . Definitely 6.0 “ ChatGPT now fixes previous chat code “ - yeah - that’ll do .

Usually do it for a tenner

Willma in a cardy............😋

The unit itself whilst noisy does seem to work !

I would