-
Posts
47 -
Joined
-
Last visited
cheekmonkey's Achievements

Member (3/5)
14
Reputation
-
all our panels were foamed together during build. the sole plates & top plates were siliconed as were all the internal roof joints & eaves. i didnt bother internally taping anything or running a VCL inside. OUtside was thermally wrapped & i did tape that although not sure it adds much. Key is making as few holes in the structure as possible & if you do foaming & siliconing them carefully (spec window openings & where any pipes enter/ leave). Our place is very very stable temp all year & pretty good air tightness without any of the internal taping. if you did tape inside as well then you could achieve passive standards pretty easily in my opinion
-
House & Contents Insurance
cheekmonkey replied to RickK54's topic in Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs)
we've been with these guys for 2 years, not claimed yet but far & away the cheapest -
@SarahHutch it was essentially a traditional slab style make up, blockwork perimeter with stick on 150mm perimeter insulation strip that also acts as expansion & limits thermal bridge. Slab make up was 100mm rejects / sand / membrane / 150mm insulation / slip membrane / mesh on 40mm feet with UFH tied to it / 150mm concrete i looked at some of the pre-formed systems but they were so expensive & didnt really work so well for fixing the SIP down do, whereas with this system our sole plate is bolted down to the blockwork.
-
Sorry missed your comment. I'll be honest I'm not sure what app was done when solar was installed but there was never a mention of costs until after the event. I simply don't agree with SSE and their rationale the legislation talks about new connections which ours is not, its just a pv install. The network doesn't need upgrading at all. The only way out is for me to limit my export and reapply which just seems completely stupid logic as everyone looses. Still these things never seem to have any common sense applied
-
I call polished when it's ground back and polished whereas ours is just floated. Agree on reason to fill cracks but our robot hoovers every day 🤣. It's purely a design detail we like regardless of practicality
-
No not yet. Osmo do an oil but its quite a faff to do now we've moved in. It's marked a bit in kitchen area from drops of grease but it doesn't really show due to the nature of the natural imperfections in the finish
-
We've recently done something similar. 150mm powerfloated finish (Not polished - i'm not sure why you would?) mesh in bottom 40-50mm with UFH pipes tied to the mesh. so circa 100mm on top but some places a touch less where levels werent perfect. we have saw cuts made throughout the slab the following day circa 30mm deep, crisscorssing the whole building. we have chosen not to mastic them as quite like them, but have mastic sealed other places as we have the old concrete barn protuding through the floor. most builds probably wouldnt have as many cuts but with the fixed structure with 8 posts we felt safer to cut to each to allow it to crack in all directions we have only got one major crack not down the cut line which is right down our hallway but i think probably due to the hot water supply to the other end of the house running under that bit. although that's even under the mesh at the bottom it must have had an impact
-
SIP wall thickness vs u value
cheekmonkey replied to Bournbrook 's topic in Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs)
My advice is don't over think it. You're on the right lines. We didn't use Kingspan, we used a system from SBS via our installer NewForest SIP, but have 170 walls & 200 roof. Essentially same as your make up here but only have internal void if req. I deliberately designed service runs to avoid battening all the internal walls so just picked a few. ultimately to just save time & money & also have walls i can fix things direct to OSB like kitchen units. We also have batten & counter externally with 20mm half lap larch over glidevale membrane We didnt bother with vapour barrier or any special taping, i did externally tape the glidevale membrane with their recommended tape but TBH i think it was probably a waste of time. all panel joints were foamed on install & mastic around roof joint. we've achieved an air test of 2.56 (that's even with 14m of leaky sliding doors), an epc of A & the place is toasty warm with no heating on at all. it's very stable temperature, we also have MVHR. -
I've had a recent letter from SSEN who state that I'm due to pay 2nd comer charges under ECCR after my recent POV install. (Circa £2.5k fee) When I called & dug into it they said it's because I am exporting & have an 8kw system & whomever put the supply to our & neighbouring plots (It's a barn conversion & the 3 plots had a new supply installed to sell them) are owed a slice of their costs of the install. I stated it's not a new connection as we've been here 18mths, the person who installed the supply never actually connected so we're not really 2nd comers, our neighbours who have about 20kw haven't been charged & so ECR shouldn't be due but they are adamant as I'm "changing the utilisation of the service " I have to pay the fee. I've argued until I'm blue but the only thing they suggest is that I complete a G98 & limit my export to 3.6kw which will avoid the fee. I find the whole thing a bit of a joke as surely the export benefits everyone & there's no network re-enforcement required. the pay back on the pittance you get would take years to clear. Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this at all - it really feels like a mistake but trying to make sense of the legislation isn't really my area of expertise.
-
We're 5% on supply & fit as we're change of use from Agri to Resi. I'll be using the same contractor to fit: - Solar - Heat pump - Underfloor heating (from heat pump) - General Plumbing (1st & 2nd Fix) Am i right that 'renewables' are 0% VAT regardless but which bits fall into that? Do we need to break up the heat pump & underfloor from the 1st fix hot water etc? Does MVHR also fall into 0% VAT? (different contractor) Thanks in advance
-
SIP strip foundation detail
cheekmonkey replied to Cormac Foley's topic in Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs)
i'd deffo double check the regs on DPC to outside ground level to be sure, our way around this is to bring block to finished floor inside & DPC outside, then bolt soleplate through above that. We will also run a 25mm insulation upstand at least 150 up inside the sole plate & SIP wall to avoid any condensation. basically i think bring your block up 50mm more & DPM/DPC works & then add upstand internally -
SIP strip foundation detail
cheekmonkey replied to Cormac Foley's topic in Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs)
You shouldn't really need 100mm blinding, but otherwise seems the same as we're doing. depending if the floor goes in before or after the SIP you can 'double bag' with dpm - so we're going to dpm & wrap up inside the sip as floor goes in later & therefore the internal dpm wraps up the wall inside too. don't worry about the bolts through dpm/dpc. it's all out the ground anyway. can't quite see the dpc layer on screen but i believe that needs to be 150 above outside ground level, it's not clear but looks like it is lower -
Vertical larch T&G cladding - what are the options for detailing external corners? I have only ever done horizonal before & just fixed nice corner posts & run to that but trying to think of options for when running vertical. Our boards will be something 75-95 with shadow gap (not 100% decided yet) Keen to hear any options & photos if possible TIA
-
Self-build steel frame barn conversion - almost complete
cheekmonkey replied to mattman's topic in Introduce Yourself
Ahhh ok - i see what you are saying... ours does not carry the walls. I maybe didn't make that super clear. The perimeter SIP wall will be sat on block/brick on a strip footing, the slab is just a slab From my original comments : "my thought at the moment is: - strip foundations with block/brick stub walls that the SIP fixes to." -
Self-build steel frame barn conversion - almost complete
cheekmonkey replied to mattman's topic in Introduce Yourself
@George so why is the raft a must? Why not make the slab structural, insulated & have the heating all in one like my idea? That way you have a nice mass to heat like Matt had experienced & ultimately a slightly easier construction as less process.