G and J Posted April 13 Posted April 13 Late in the design process we twigged that lenders like masonry skins covering at least part of timber frame houses. So we added one the ground floor, and we converted the garage to all 100mm blockwork with 200mm pillars. Ours is a narrow site so I've always striven for the thinnest walls possible, so I went for 75mm block rather than 100m. The architect then added 25mm of render. Fast forward to working with our SE on the foundation design and he commented that whilst 75mm would be OK he'd do 100mm himself. This would grow the walls a bit, but not by 25mm if we went over to one of these new fangled render systems like k-rend. Views?
Russell griffiths Posted April 13 Posted April 13 (edited) Yep 100mm and 8mm render and 1.6mm top coat. haven't seen anybody lay 75mm blocks for a long time. how bigs the cavity, if you use surecav can you tighten up the cavity a bit. Edited April 13 by Russell griffiths
G and J Posted April 13 Author Posted April 13 1 hour ago, Russell griffiths said: Yep 100mm and 8mm render and 1.6mm top coat. haven't seen anybody lay 75mm blocks for a long time. how bigs the cavity, if you use surecav can you tighten up the cavity a bit. Cavity is 50mm. I thought that we had to keep the cavity clear to allow the frame to breath. That render thickness sounds good. Is that k-rend?
Russell griffiths Posted April 13 Posted April 13 The cavity is clear if you use surecav, you can go lower width cavity if you use a proper barrier 50mm is fairly standard to allow for inaccurate building practices and materials. ensure you keep the bottom of the cavity clean, you will need to exercise old fashioned good practices to keep the cavity clean at the bottom.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now