mjc55 Posted Thursday at 18:12 Share Posted Thursday at 18:12 Anyone used this of late. It looks good in terms of replacing other types of less environmentally friendly insulation but haven't got far enough to look at costs. There was an old thread from around 2019 saying that it needs to be much, much thicker (their emphasis), does this mean that it is much more expensive in the long run? That was pre-pandemic and presumably petrochemical type insulations have increased in price a lot since then. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger440 Posted Thursday at 22:19 Share Posted Thursday at 22:19 4 hours ago, mjc55 said: Anyone used this of late. It looks good in terms of replacing other types of less environmentally friendly insulation but haven't got far enough to look at costs. There was an old thread from around 2019 saying that it needs to be much, much thicker (their emphasis), does this mean that it is much more expensive in the long run? That was pre-pandemic and presumably petrochemical type insulations have increased in price a lot since then. Thanks Ive used it, though the main drivers were damp issues in 1800's house, and minimising build up depth. Clearly with the amount i used, we were not achieving building reg level insulation. But, easy, definitely. Id consider it again, be it retrofit or new build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjc55 Posted yesterday at 00:56 Author Share Posted yesterday at 00:56 2 hours ago, Roger440 said: Ive used it, though the main drivers were damp issues in 1800's house, and minimising build up depth. Clearly with the amount i used, we were not achieving building reg level insulation. But, easy, definitely. Id consider it again, be it retrofit or new build. Presumably cost wasn't an issue then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger440 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 7 hours ago, mjc55 said: Presumably cost wasn't an issue then? I dont remember it being particuarly high. As i had no other options i didnt focus on it that much. And it was only onew (big) room Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Ambrose Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago >>> it needs to be much, much thicker This is my material crib-sheet. It suggests, that for the same U-Value, Foamglas needs to be twice as thick as, say, PIR. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now