MarkW1979 Posted November 1, 2023 Share Posted November 1, 2023 A quick question I hope someone could help me with re: movement joints in blockwork. Guidance suggests that in structures constructed of cement based materials (concrete blocks, artificial stone, concrete bricks, cement render and the like) then movement joints should be provided at 6m intervals and within 3m of corners, however re: the corners - does this mean within 3 metre in each axis from the corner, or just one per corner if that makes sense? (i.e. the difference between the 2 pictures - movement joint in blue): Many thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted November 1, 2023 Share Posted November 1, 2023 Have you got an engineer to help you? Movement joint positioning isn't an exact science so some experience and technical understanding is needed. Generally MJs are only required in continuous runs of blockwork panels, not placed at 6m regardless of the rest of the geometry. Also windows are better dealt with using bed joint reinforcement rather than movement joints due to the complications of lintels etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkW1979 Posted November 1, 2023 Author Share Posted November 1, 2023 Hi George, Many thanks. The engineer has done the drawings but the brickie has come on site and basically said that what has indicated is a bit excessive and plans to rationalise from 11 to 9. The 9 proposed (in orange on the drawing) seems to make more sense to me but I am just trying to understand the rationale for the SEs drawing. Cheers, Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted November 1, 2023 Share Posted November 1, 2023 Is it a timber frame with a blockwork outerleaf? It may be that more MJs are needed than with masonry construction because on the face of it that is an excessive number of MJs. However without seeing elevations etc I can't be definite. Is this from a timber frame company engineer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkW1979 Posted November 1, 2023 Author Share Posted November 1, 2023 Hi George, Yes it is timber frame. The engineer doesn't work for the timber frame company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now