Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was wondering why people go for Soundbloc, considering Duraline has a higher mass at the same thickness /m2. Does anyone know why someone would prefer Soundbloc for soundproofing? Am I missing something?

 

Duraline

14.1kg/m2

 

Soundbloc

13kg/m2

Posted

For anyone else interested in this, I ended up calling Gyproc and spoke to their technical team - with them saying that technically Duraline is the better product acoustically. Interesting. I wonder why they even make Soundbloc..

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm not checking, but I'd expect they have done formal tests for the acoustic stuff but not the other.

So it gets specified and they can sell it , prob at a premium.

 

I'm only guessing, so perhaps cynicism is prevailing.

 

Of course  an Engineer at the head office will only tell the facts, and isn't marketing.

 

I believe build quality to be crucial in acoustic walls..so buy what you like but do it very well.

Posted

I doubt the difference in density or mass/m2 makes much difference acoustically. I thought duraline was just more robust for heavily trafficked areas 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...