Garald Posted August 28, 2022 Share Posted August 28, 2022 Yet another episode of the insulation saga - perhaps the last one? As some of you remember, I am renovating a (hitherto uninsulated) house from around 1930 in the Paris area. On the south side, I have a bit of space, and I also very much have a need for as much sound insulation as I can get (busy street); thus, unsurprisingly, we are going to use 145cm of cellulose-based insulation (BioFib Trio) - counting an air layer and an anti-fire barrier, we are talking about 18cm or so. On the north (courtyard) side, however, I don't have that much place to play with. My architect considered polyiso (PIR) for a while, but there is some contradictory information regarding its safety in case of fire. Now my architect proposes the following solution for the north side: combine reflective insulation (as in, e.g., https://www.materiaux-naturels.fr/produit/1468-iso-lin-hpv-isolant-mince-reflecteur , which gives R=3.25) and about 45mm of BioFib Trio. In total, the insulation provided is well above the norms (R>=3.8). What is the catch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamyTea Posted August 28, 2022 Share Posted August 28, 2022 4 hours ago, Garald said: What is the catch? Unknown long term performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garald Posted August 28, 2022 Author Share Posted August 28, 2022 2 hours ago, SteamyTea said: Unknown long term performance. Anything I should be particularly concerned by? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamyTea Posted August 28, 2022 Share Posted August 28, 2022 4 minutes ago, Garald said: Anything I should be particularly concerned by? I had a quick websearch and just hit the academic paywall, but there does seem to be a fair amount of longitudinal studies about it. Seems dirt and loss of refelectivity is the issue. You can use your university login to read that stuff, and anything interesting you can post up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garald Posted August 28, 2022 Author Share Posted August 28, 2022 12 minutes ago, SteamyTea said: I had a quick websearch and just hit the academic paywall, but there does seem to be a fair amount of longitudinal studies about it. Seems dirt and loss of refelectivity is the issue. You can use your university login to read that stuff, and anything interesting you can post up. Send me a link or two to get started? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamyTea Posted August 28, 2022 Share Posted August 28, 2022 1 minute ago, Garald said: Send me a link or two to get started? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778818315986 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garald Posted August 28, 2022 Author Share Posted August 28, 2022 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garald Posted August 28, 2022 Author Share Posted August 28, 2022 I'll just include some links to the insulation materials the architect is proposing, for ease of reference. The price is surprisingly sane - around 20 eur/m^2. https://www.ati-isol.com/gammes/isolants-respirant-hpv https://www.materiaux-naturels.fr/produit/1468-iso-lin-hpv-isolant-mince-reflecteur https://www.isolation-itr.com/non-classe/thermo-laine-lin-2.html http://www.isolantmince-discount.com/fr/isolant-mince/56-isolant-multicouche-m17-pro-lin.html https://www.winco-tech.com/fr/produit/skytech-pro-xl-toiture-isolant/ The only one to have a (very) good fire rating is the last one, which, on the other hand, seems to involve fibreglass, whereas the others contain no synthetic fibres. Same dilemma as usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now