Jump to content

Cognis0

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Personal Information

  • Location
    Somerset

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Cognis0's Achievements

Member

Member (3/5)

7

Reputation

  1. Yes, that sounds about right. I'm sure there are better ways to do most things...!
  2. Yes, a simple flow path from supply to extract is what I have suggested (extracting air from the bathrooms as well as the bedrooms), and the flow path from ground to first floors seems more logical than the complex air movements produced with wet room only extract. The standard methodology doesn't make much sense to me ~ a bathroom produces water vapour for half an hour so in the mornings and I read somewhere the average shower puts about 250ml water into the air, so a lot of air/vapour needs to be extracted relatively quickly. Whilst sleeping a person puts about the same amount of water into the air overnight, but this needs to be done at a slower rate extending over the whole night. I am sure I will end up with a standard installation, but I do have doubts about the current methods used...
  3. Although I spent years planning for a Passivhaus new build, having failed to find a suitable site we have ended up in a 16th century origins thatched house!! With an old house I had abandoned the idea of MVHR, but with the amount of condensation and mold we are seeing this is now back on the table. Before I get started on working out what is needed, there is a fundamental issue it would be good to get feedback on. Most of the condensation and mold we see is on and around bedroom windows over-night/morning. Bedrooms also have lots of dust and who knows what else in the air which needs to be extracted. So to my small brain we need to see extract vents in the bedrooms rather than supply vents. In fact my limited brain power tells that the best whole house ventilation solution would be to have air extracted from all of the first floor rooms with heat-recovery fresh air then being supplied back to the ground floor reception rooms (open plan arrangements). Fresh/warm air would then rise up the central staircase and back to the bedrooms... Please let me know what is wrong with my logic here. Many thanks
  4. That's helpful, thanks Iceverge...
  5. I've removed the ceiling in our lean-to extension to form a nice airy/open kitchen/family space. I plan to insulate between the rafters with 140mm flexible wood-fibre and then over the top with 60mm wood-fibre t&g. On top of this, for VCL/airtightness, I was thinking of using Passive Purple liquid membrane in white which would also provide a decorative finish. This should avoid the need to scim plaster and paint. Does anyone have any comments/see flaws in this plan?
  6. Thanks, that's helpful. Can you please clarify what the issue would be with an anode? I am a bit mystified by EASHP which also reheats the ventilation (or some with wet heating). Most of the heat coming through the MVHR is recycled by the heat exchanger back to supply; by the time the DHW is heated it's difficult to understand what energy can be left to provide any meaningful contribution to space heating! Cheers....
  7. Hi @Gone West.. Can you recommend EASHP unit? Vaillant do the aroSTOR which looks interesting. Would you recommend a single supplier/installer for all MVHR and EASHP together? Thanks
  8. Would you mind sharing which company designed/supplied your MVHR kit? Many thanks.
  9. Although members here have tried to set me on the right path and divert my "unhealthy" interest in PVT, it remains alluring and is still on my radar. A Dutch company, Triple Solar, have been supplying PVT panels for heat pumps for some time (over 1000 installations I think), and have recently launched their own dedicated heat pump: https://triplesolar.eu/pvt-warmtepomp/ . They claim an SPF of 5.6 for space heating and 3.8 for DHW. As an alternative to digging up the garden for ground source, this seems to be very attractive. They don't yet have a distributor in the UK, but I will do more research and post anything I find which might be interesting. If anyone has observations at this early stage I would, of course be delighted to read them...
  10. I could not agree more with this ~ the quieter the house the more accute one's hearing becomes!
  11. Thanks for all your comments everyone, which I will be referring back to as I specify/select the system..
  12. Yes, that was over 40 years ago! As I recall the house had one of those nice 1960s gas fires in the living room and some kind of gas heater on a quarter landing on the stairs! It also had a gas "geyser" water heater. This was my first house bought in 1979, just before a big upward price move in the market, so we were lucky (sold it two year later for twice the price). No doubt I would now find that house horribly cold, although it seemed fine at the time.
  13. Heating has been on for 2 weeks and the cold seems to be a distant memory! I suppose I had better check the gas meter to see how much its costing to keep the house warm..
  14. Such systems are available from "exotic" European manufacturers coming with galvanized ductwork, to perhaps more basic UK offerings, often with narrow flexible plastic ducting. No doubt there is a significant difference in pricing and, presumably, performance. One area which is very important is noise. My wife is extremely sensitive to electronic and vibration noise and finding something which effectively silent is just about top of the list of requirements. Your comments welcome...
×
×
  • Create New...