• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ash_scotland88

  • Rank
    New Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. ash_scotland88

    Scottish Building Regs - WC

    Thanks guys. Picture attached is the cropped area I was looking at, originally designed to England and Wales part M and a few extra mm here and there. From top down -300mm wide sink space,(the top side of this wall works out to be 600mm for a kitchen unit depth) -850wide by800 deep door/accessible space -850wide by 700 toilet space. Basicallyneed to see if can go out 250mm more or push into the kitchen more and not use the wall thickness difference between exterior and new interior. Or flip it around. Sadly think it's all a bit too much of a pinch and compramise Edit: reading that a sink can infringe on a access space, can a sink (small cloakroom style) also encroch on the "activity space"? I can quite decifer. Also what may let us down is having to include a shower space for future use, or is this not required also due to existing bathroom but on a different level?
  2. ash_scotland88

    Scottish Building Regs - WC

    Cheers, that's the sort of explanation/ understanding I was looking for. That these accessible activity spaces are in fact the "legal minimum" Can activity spaces overlap? So can the wash hand basin activity space also be part of the toilet activity space? Looking at the document saved on my phone it's 1100 Infront of the toilet by 800 wide. Is there a general rule for over all WC room size? I might need to post a picture of the space and door positions to demonstrate it. Is there a general guideline for external wall thickness too?
  3. ash_scotland88

    Scottish Building Regs - WC

    I was translating the meaning of accessible as disabled, especially in the regards of front/side access. I have found a 600mm deep comfort height toilet. If a door swung outwards it would be into a vestibule area blocking other an door, which would not open into the WC door if left open. If that makes sense? The current extension is pushed to every MM almost possible, could go longer but need to check build lines, and the WC would carve out space from an other room if it is possible so don't really want to make it much bigger. I know Part M in England is a lot smaller than up here, from memory, started reading the wrong regs to begin with.
  4. ash_scotland88

    Scottish Building Regs - WC

    Excuse the long post and the bit of waffling but I'm looking for some advice regarding Scottish Building Regs and adding a toilet to an extension where there's not one on that floor. So my understanding is that if you want to build a WC then it needs to be a certain size, show you can add a shower at a later date if required. Essentially make it future proof for disability access. But I was bored over the christmas break and was reading up on the building regs. 2017 Building standards technical handbook says in 3.12.5: If it is intended to install a new sanitary facility on the principal living level or entrance storey of a dwelling and there is not already an accessible sanitary facility of that type within the dwelling, the first new facility should be in accordance with the guidance given in clauses 3.12.3 and 3.12.4. So if our current bathroom (on first floor) fits the guidance for front and side accesible loading would we be ok as it does not stipulate that it has to be on the same level, as my understanding has been 3.12.0 also says Although not recommending that sanitary facilities on the principal living level of a dwelling be designed to an optimum standard for wheelchair users, it should be possible for most people to use these facilities unassisted and in privacy. The room I am looking at is about 800-850wide by 1600 length, the door would be to one end of the length. Taking this into account do you think the below could be succesfully argued?.... "Referring to 3.12.0 and taking this aboard the WC has been designed to maximise space by the proposed use of a pocket door over a swing. The occupants further propose the installation of a comfort height WC that will benefit those of restricted mobility. The WC room size may not be designed optimally to full wheel chair users but all care and design has been made to make the WC as accessible “as reasonably practical” to those of limited mobility and improving amenity of the dwelling. Not including a WC on this level may be of a hindrance in the future and benefits the comfort and usability of the dwelling for the current occupants and guests while increasing the practicality and desirability of a family 3bedroom home." Does the 1100 spacing infront of the toilet is that still a standard that needs to be fulfilled? Or am i simply missing an other chapter or cross reference? Thanks,