Planning Officer asked if we want to withdraw

[Jo J]

30 minutes ago, DevilDamo said:

To the rear of no. 46 is a window and French doors. As those openings serve one room, then the LPA can decide which opening to take. The new dwelling (no. 46a) breached the 45 degree line line from the French doors but was acceptable from the window, which is why it was approved. Your proposal breaches the 45 degree lines from the French doors and window, which is why the LPA are stating is the issue.

 

So your options are to withdraw or allow the application to be determined. Bear in mind that the former will not provide you with a formal decision to Appeal, nor will you have the Officers’ Report to cross reference to. 

I will let it be determined, as the supplements planning says nearest window, and the officer has only quoted nearest window in all correspondence.

 

[DevilDamo]

Something to note… Planning is not normally required to change or insert or new windows. So the developer swapping those positions may have well aided their application. Although you think it has hindered your application, the window even in its previous position would have put a limit on your proposals anyway.

[Jo J]

13 minutes ago, DevilDamo said:

Something to note… Planning is not normally required to change or insert or new windows. So the developer swapping those positions may have well aided their application. Although you think it has hindered your application, the window even in its previous position would have put a limit on your proposals anyway.

He changed them because of the 45, it's in the paperwork and it was asked by the planning