MortarThePoint Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 (edited) I've found this interesting paper [1] that compares different window positions relative to the cavity and their affects on condensation and thermal bridging. Six different positions were compared (modelled) and conclusions drawn: Aligned with the outer face of the façade. Fixed into the external leaf and overlapping the cavity 30mm. Fixed into the external leaf and overlapping the cavity 70mm. Aligned with centre of the cavity. Fixed into the inner leaf overlapping this leaf by 50mm. Aligned with the inner face of the room. Whilst position 2 is the most common form constructed as it is "a much more robust detail" but doesn't perform as well from a thermal bridging (best: 5, 4, 3) or condensation perspective (best: 3 and 4). My Take: Given that (3) is a position near to (2) it probably doesn't reduce robustness of installation too much and so represents a good balance. The paper acknowledges that it only considers the thermal impact, not other factors (e.g. maintenance and drainage). I'm using Thermally broken lintels so suspect that would change things a bit. My gut feeling is it would reduce the benefit of 4 over 3 over 2. What choice have most made here? [1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778816316383 Edited June 9, 2021 by MortarThePoint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortarThePoint Posted June 9, 2021 Author Share Posted June 9, 2021 (edited) Keystone Lintels has a PSI value calculator which says "Frame to overlap cavity min. 30mm". Probably still better to have more overlap. Edited June 9, 2021 by MortarThePoint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now