Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'electricity pricing'.
-
Checking the latest offers I notice that the electric standing charge has almost doubled. This is apparently because a levy is now charged to pay extra money for commercial wind and PV farm produced electricity. This will put my bill up about £91.25 per year. Now the government is thinking of this: Households face paying extra on energy bills to cover customers' bad debts under plans by the industry regulator. (BBC report) Ofgem is proposing lifting the energy price cap by £16 between April next year and March 2025 so bill payers can contribute to the costs to electricity companies for the customers who can't pay their bill which has caused a debt of about £2.9bn. So Ofgem is considering, passing the cost of those not paying, from those not paying, to those paying. Causing more of those who are paying, to be not able to afford paying, causing some of them to ending up not paying. Therefore increasing the contribution needing to be paid by the people paying. Causing more of those who are paying, to be not able to afford paying, causing some of them to ending up not paying. Therefore increasing the contribution needing to be paid by the people paying, and on and on and on and on. WTF! It's like some absurd version of musical chairs. It's insanity!
-
I've just been reading the latest (rather badly put together) update on the review that Ofgem are undertaking looking at electricity pricing, specifically the means by which the "fixed" element of the network cost is recovered. The latest update (from yesterday) is here: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/system/files/docs/2017/11/tcr_working_paper_nov17_final.pdf and I think they are way off the mark in the way they are looking at the costs of recovering the fixed operating cost element. We have a market that has been wholly artificially created by government, who have arbitrarily decided to divide electricity supply into three main sectors; those responsible for generation, those responsible for network provision, updating and maintenance and those responsible for selling electricity to consumers. In the first and last instance, a semi-competitive market exists. Anyone can invest in becoming a generator, in essence, it's pretty much a free market, with some constraints in terms of regulatory interference aimed at retaining a reliable mix of generation sources. Similarly, anyone can invest in becoming and electricity retailer, a somewhat simpler task that becoming a generator. Stuck in the middle we have a major lump of the fixed cost element, and this is not competed at all, it is divvied up into Distribution Network Operators that have a monopoly in their particular regions. It seems that it is recovering the costs incurred by these monopolies is thing that is vexing Ofgem, with them suggesting alternatives to the fixed daily standing charge as ways of covering these "fixed" costs. I'm not at all convinced that they are going about this the right way. There seems little incentive to make the DNOs more efficient, and consumers have no control at all over DNO imposed charges that form a part of their bill. My personal view is that a good starting point would be to remove the standing charge system completely, and therefore force those who use more of the network capacity (the high users of energy) to pay more towards the maintenance and upkeep of the network. It'll be interesting to see how Ofgem are steered and directed by the energy industry to deliver a more profitable scheme, as I'm certain that is what the outcome will be, as Ofgem seems a pointless and toothless body that is little more than a talking shop to allow the industry to do as it wishes.......................
- 19 replies
-
- ofgem
- electricity pricing
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with: