Hi all
Highways have objected on these grounds;
Access
The application proposes to extend the dwelling and provide ne fencing and gates to the front of the dwelling. The fencing will follow the line of the existing boundary which will be acceptable, however, the application also proposes to provide a sliding vehicle gate which will not be acceptable. Drawing T1162 - PL04 Proposed Site Plan shows the gates located approximately 1m back from the rear of the footway requiring vehicles entering or leaving the site to wait on Barnsley Road while the gates are opened of closed affecting the free flow of traffic and causing an obstruction to the detriment of highway safety. Gates should be located 5m back from the adopted highway to allow vehicles to wait off the highway.
Please note the following points below:
My response to this was
* photos of the hinges still on the stone pillars.
* Most of the neighbours have existing gates level with the front boundary wall (none being electric)
*The plans are for an electric gate, I would be adding a GSM module unit which will allow us to open the gate from anywhere.
* There is no parking restriction on the road immediately outside the property and ample parking positions are available. - sent photos to support showing the width of the road and cars parked
* The main road is a good width and is used frequently for parking.
*I have attached photos illustrating the vehicles parked all the way up the road leaving ample room for vehicles travelling up and down the road and not causing an obstruction. If the gates were not open for a visitor, they would park on the opposite side of the adjacent to the gates and access the property via the pedestrian gate.
Highways have then come back with;
The applicant has provided photos of gate pillars bearing hinges, however, these are historic and will therefore not be acceptable as mitigation for the current proposal. I would therefore retain the requirement for gates to be located 5m back from the adopted highway to allow vehicles to wait off the highway. The applicant states that parking is available outside the site and that the gates will be opened and closed remotely, however, the future maintenance and operation of the gates and the availability of parking on Barnsley Road cannot be guaranteed and I would therefore retain a highway objection and recommendation for refusal.
At the risk of holding the whole development up I have then removed the gates from the plans submitted and hopefully highways will lift there objection so I can start on the actual building work. Due to having small children and my driveway being open straight onto a road I require a gate. To have a gate 5m up my driveway would require me to more or less rebuild more whole front wall.
Thoughts ?
* Her main point is the gates are historic but I'm unable to find any official planning guidance on this point