
BTC Builder
Members-
Posts
43 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
BTC Builder's Achievements

Member (3/5)
4
Reputation
-
Just to clear up any confusion, the boards where made in Turkey but I had no role in their shipment. I just rang the number I saw on Facebook and now 84 boards are in my (would be) kitchen. I have been given a VAT recipt. I've checked the number and it matches the name of company and address. Providing they cut and screw like normal, and I'll test skim a room, I'll get more. It's a massive saving.
-
Never heard of a CE label before, but on inspection there is a ce label on every board, but a search for this label online only returns the manufacturer website
-
No nothing like that, just standard 2400x1200x12.5 for dry lining. Building Control won't be saying anything because they look exactly the same as British Gypsum, knauf, and Siniat. I was more wondering how they skim up and if the thistle will still adhere properly. I guess I'm of the mindset that it's too good to be true so what's wrong with them
-
A friend sent me a link to a Facebook post advertising plasterboards significantly cheaper than what you'd get at local merchants. We're talking £2.50 a board cheaper than the absolute best bulk price I've been offered Obviously, you know that at this price there's something a bit different at play but because I need around 400 I thought I'd give them a go and got a pallet to try them out. They're Atiskan Alci, was wondering if anyone had used them before? They look and feel exactly the same as a normal board, if they said "British Gypsum" on them I wouldn't know any different.
-
Thought I'd update to say that in the end, I went with a screening company arranged via my plumber at an excellent rate. Thanks to everyone who offered their advice.
-
From another thread, I know you're local to me. Can you recommend any suppliers of screed mix? It's a large area, 140sqm and we wouldn't want it all in a day as we wouldn't be able to level it in one go. we'd split it into two and have an expansion joint in the middle (doorway) regardless of whether we do it all ourselves or have someone else supply the mix.
-
I've got the man power and a large mixer so not worried in that regard, I just don't want to do the wrong mix that will crack or won't work with the underfloor heating
-
This is what i was wondering, I've seen it done on other jobs I've sub contracted to and would not attempt it semi dry. So wet mix is no good?
-
I was wondering if anyone had done their own sand and cement (75mm) floor screed and what the correct mix would be? I was thinking 3:1 with concreting sand and sbr but don't really know if this would be suitable with the underfloor heating?
-
150mm. I find pir as easy to use as dritherm, which is difficult and itchy to cut, but I don't like it getting wet and soaking through so prefer pir
-
I've got 0.17 u value, thomas armstrong 7.3n lightweight concrete blocks inner and outer skin, 100mm unilin PIR partial cavity fill. Blocks 97p each, 6.48 each for the unilin.
-
We're way past foundation stage. Could such a thing be left entirely external and only drill into the house if necessary above the dpc cavity tray? I've got a radon barrier so having a duct in the ground and up into the house seems at odds with that. I've also no intention of using any ducting as the cable is there in my front garden. I'll only be going down the ducting route if someone forces me to. I should add that someone else at LABC, a younger chap who is keen as mustard, has already mentioned my "lack of a connectivity plan" so it's not as if I'm opening any new doors in asking the question. I'm just wondering if my "plan" to use the existing overhead cable is viable
-
Why ask? Because I don't know what gigabit ready connection is. I don't know if it will or won't involve getting into the sub floor, which with underfloor heating, screed, tiles will cause massive issues, if I leave them until sign off inspection.
-
I know there's been a few threads on this over the past 18 months but I thought I'd see if anyone can help with my situation. I'm building a replacement house within a built up residential area. There's a telegraph pole at the end of the driveway where an overhead cable used to go into the old house and give us 100mb download speed Internet. When we demolished the old bungalow, we simply wrapped this cable up, covered it, and the intention is to simply put it back on the new house with the same Internet provider (sky). I just had a meeting with the local authority building inspector and when I asked if using the telegraph pole to provide a cable with a 100mb connection would satisfy part r and ultimately allow him to sign off the house, he wouldn't commit to anything and almost became a robot "every building regulation submission should have a part R connectivity plan". Well my plan is just to use the cable I've already got but he wouldn't tell me if he would pass it or not. He's an old bloke and probably thinks the whole thing is a load of bollocks. Would a letter from sky showing the speed available be good enough?
-
DPC - BS6515 vs Zedex "high performance"
BTC Builder replied to BTC Builder's topic in Building Regulations
So would the summary be, avoid and stick to polythene trays above the radon tray? I noticed NHBC are now saying polythene trays should be avoided which probably contributed to the architect specifying zedex.