Shush0r

It appears that they have, there doesn't appear to be much I can do about it either. Annoying.

This is the exact scenario !

I have a bit of a funny one. I am converting a bungalow into a detached house and as a result the LA + Highways etc wanted me to increase the onsite parking provision from 1 space to 3 spaces (I currently have one parking space served by a single drop kerb). I received planning permission to implement a second, double, drop kerb along with a further 2 on site spaces served from this dropped kerb, highways were consulted during the process and were happy with this solution. They also stuck on a pre-occupation condition requiring me to implement this dropped kerb. I then applied for this new dropped kerb, chased a few times - finally 17 weeks later I received a call out of the blue from the planning officer saying that the LA are now not happy with the second dropped kerb and they want me to submit a minor amendment to 'shut off' my original dropped kerb and just have the new double (and now just two onsite spaces). Where do I stand on this? They have clearly messed up here. Surely any costs in achieving what they now want should be down to them? Any advice gratefully received.